Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Online vs in-person musculoskeletal ultrasound course: a cohort comparison study.
Lake, Shirley; Brydges, Ryan; Penney, Chris; Wilson, Diane; Sweezie, Raquel; Bagovich, Maria; Bong, David; Barr, Susan; Stroud, Lynfa.
Afiliação
  • Lake S; Division of Rheumatology, University of Toronto, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, M4N3M5, Toronto, ON, Canada. Shirley.lake@Sunnybrook.ca.
  • Brydges R; Department of Medicine, Unity Health Toronto, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
  • Penney C; Division of Rheumatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
  • Wilson D; Lunenberg, Nova Scotia, Canada.
  • Sweezie R; Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada.
  • Bagovich M; Division of Rheumatology, University of Toronto, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, M4N3M5, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Bong D; University of Barcelona School of Medicine, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Barr S; Division of Rheumatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
  • Stroud L; Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Ultrasound J ; 16(1): 30, 2024 May 31.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38819664
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Point-of-care musculoskeletal (MSK) ultrasound (US) courses are typically held in-person. The COVID-19 pandemic guidelines forced courses to switch to online delivery. To determine this impact, we conducted an observational cohort study, comparing homework completion and image quality between an Online and a historical In-person cohort.

METHODS:

The In-person (n = 27) and Online (n = 24) cohorts attended two learning sessions spaced six months apart. The course content was the same, while the process of delivery differed. As homework, participants submitted US images biweekly for up to five months after each session. Expert faculty provided written feedback to all participants, and two independent reviewers rated the image quality for a subset of participants in each group who had completed at least 70% of their homework (In-person, n = 9; Online, n = 9). Participants self-reported their satisfaction through post-course evaluation.

RESULTS:

63% of In-Person and 71% of Online cohort participants submitted their homework images. We observed no differences in the mean amount of homework images submitted for In-person (M = 37.3%, SD = 42.6%) and Online cohorts (M = 48.1%, SD = 38.8%; p > 0.05, Mann-Whitney U Test). At course end, the cohorts did not differ in overall image quality (p > 0.05, Wilcoxon Signed-rank Test). All participants reported high levels of satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS:

A convenience sample of participants attending a basic MSK US course in-person and online did not differ statistically in homework completion, quality of submitted US images, or course satisfaction. We add to literature suggesting online learning remains a viable option post-pandemic.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Ultrasound J Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Ultrasound J Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article