Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Collaboration matters: A randomized controlled trial of patient-clinician collaboration in suicide risk assessment and intervention.
Lohani, Monika; Bryan, Craig J; Elsey, Jamie S; Dutton, Sam; Findley, Samuel P; Langenecker, Scott A; West, Kristen; Baker, Justin C.
Afiliação
  • Lohani M; Department of Psychology, University of Utah, United States of America. Electronic address: monika.lohani@utah.edu.
  • Bryan CJ; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, The Ohio State University, United States of America.
  • Elsey JS; Department of Educational Psychology, University of Utah, United States of America.
  • Dutton S; Department of Educational Psychology, University of Utah, United States of America.
  • Findley SP; Department of Educational Psychology, University of Utah, United States of America.
  • Langenecker SA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, The Ohio State University, United States of America.
  • West K; Department of Educational Psychology, University of Utah, United States of America.
  • Baker JC; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, The Ohio State University, United States of America.
J Affect Disord ; 360: 387-393, 2024 Sep 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38838788
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Clinician collaboration can help high-risk individuals to manage their suicidal crises. However, limited research has directly examined how higher patient-clinician collaboration during assessment and intervention can effectively reduce suicidal ideation. This novel randomized clinical trial compared a high vs. low level of patient-clinician collaboration by pairing commonly used assessment (Structured Interview vs. Narrative Assessment) and intervention approaches (Safety Planning Intervention vs. Crisis Response Planning). We hypothesized that the interventions involving higher (than lower) patient-clinician collaboration during assessment (Narrative Assessment) or intervention (Crisis Response Planning) would lead to larger reductions in suicidal ideation.

METHODS:

Eighty-two participants with a history of suicide ideation and/or attempts were randomly assigned to one of the four interventions varying in patient-clinician collaboration. After attrition, sixty-six participants completed the study. Suicidal ideation via ecological momentary assessment was measured 14 days before and 14 days after treatment.

RESULTS:

Although the severity of suicidal ideation decreased in all groups, the two groups that included highly collaborative assessment had larger pre-post reductions in suicidal ideation (Narrative Assessment+Safety Plan; dwithin = 0.26, and Narrative Assessment+Crisis Response Plan; dwithin = 0.19) than the groups that included a checklist-based assessment (Structured Interview).

LIMITATIONS:

Longer follow-up periods with a larger sample would have provided an understanding of the durability of intervention effects.

CONCLUSION:

Results suggest that the inclusion of higher patient-clinician collaboration techniques during suicide risk assessment can effectively reduce suicidal thoughts. Thus, clinician-led collaborative risk assessment approaches can enhance the effects of safety planning-type interventions among patients with elevated risk for suicide versus checklist-based assessment approaches.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Intervenção em Crise / Ideação Suicida / Prevenção do Suicídio Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Affect Disord Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Intervenção em Crise / Ideação Suicida / Prevenção do Suicídio Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Affect Disord Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article