Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of extramedullary multiple myeloma on outcomes with idecabtagene vicleucel.
Zanwar, Saurabh; Sidana, Surbhi; Shune, Leyla; Puglianini, Omar Castaneda; Pasvolsky, Oren; Gonzalez, Rebecca; Dima, Danai; Afrough, Aimaz; Kaur, Gurbakhash; Davis, James A; Herr, Megan; Hashmi, Hamza; Forsberg, Peter; Sborov, Douglas; Anderson, Larry D; McGuirk, Joseph P; Wagner, Charlotte; Lieberman-Cribbin, Alex; Rossi, Adriana; Freeman, Ciara L; Locke, Frederick L; Richard, Shambavi; Khouri, Jack; Lin, Yi; Patel, Krina K; Kumar, Shaji K; Hansen, Doris K.
Afiliação
  • Zanwar S; Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
  • Sidana S; Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
  • Shune L; The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
  • Puglianini OC; Blood and Marrow Transplant and Cellular Immunotherapy, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
  • Pasvolsky O; Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Gonzalez R; Blood and Marrow Transplant and Cellular Immunotherapy, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
  • Dima D; Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Afrough A; UT Southwestern Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
  • Kaur G; UT Southwestern Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
  • Davis JA; Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
  • Herr M; Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA.
  • Hashmi H; Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
  • Forsberg P; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Sborov D; University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
  • Anderson LD; The University of Utah Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
  • McGuirk JP; UT Southwestern Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
  • Wagner C; The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
  • Lieberman-Cribbin A; The University of Utah Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
  • Rossi A; Department of Medicine, Hematology and Medical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
  • Freeman CL; Department of Medicine, Hematology and Medical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
  • Locke FL; Blood and Marrow Transplant and Cellular Immunotherapy, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
  • Richard S; Blood and Marrow Transplant and Cellular Immunotherapy, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
  • Khouri J; Department of Medicine, Hematology and Medical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
  • Lin Y; Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Patel KK; Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
  • Kumar SK; Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. KPatel1@mdanderson.org.
  • Hansen DK; Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. Kumar.Shaji@mayo.edu.
J Hematol Oncol ; 17(1): 42, 2024 Jun 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38845015
ABSTRACT
Idecabtagene vicleucel (Ide-cel) has demonstrated excellent efficacy and durable responses in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). However, the outcomes with ide-cel in patients with extramedullary disease (EMD) remain incompletely characterized. We included patients with RRMM treated with ide-cel between May 2021 and April 2023 across 11 US academic institutions. Visceral or soft tissue lesions non-contiguous from bone was classified as EMD. Time-to-event analyses were performed from date of ide-cel infusion. Among 351 patients, 84 (24%) had EMD prior to infusion. The median follow-up from ide-cel infusion was 18.2 months (95% CI 17-19.3). The day 90 overall response rates (ORR) were 52% vs. 82% for the EMD and non-EMD cohorts, respectively (p < 0.001). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.3 months (95% CI 4.1-6.9) for the EMD cohort vs. 11.1 months (95% CI 9.2-12.6; p < 0.0001) for the non-EMD cohort. In a multivariable analysis, EMD was an independent predictor of inferior PFS [hazard ratio 1.5 (1.1-2.2), p = 0.02]. The median overall survival was 14.8 months [95% CI 9-Not reached (NR)] vs. 26.9 months (26.3 vs. NR, p = 0.006) for the EMD and non-EMD cohorts, respectively. Extramedullary disease represents an independent predictor of inferior day 90 ORR and PFS among patients treated with ide-cel.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Mieloma Múltiplo Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Hematol Oncol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Mieloma Múltiplo Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Hematol Oncol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article