Different treatment modalities on the prognosis of patients with stage I-IIIa small cell lung cancer: a population based study.

ABSTRACT

Background: Several studies have shown that surgery may improve prognosis in patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC). This study aimed to compare the effects of different treatment modalities on lung cancer specific survival (LCSS) and overall survival (OS) in LS-SCLC patients. Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database was used to identify patients diagnosed with LS-SCLC. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to determine the effect of each factor on LCSS and OS. Multivariate analysis was used to analyze the relationship between patient characteristics and survival of different treatment modalities. Results: After a series of screening steps, this study ultimately analyzed the prognosis of patients with stage I-IIIa SCLC under different treatment modalities. The results showed that lobectomy plus postoperative chemoradiotherapy was significantly better than chemoradiotherapy or lobectomy in treatment (all P<0.05). For stage II and IIIA patients, lobectomy plus postoperative chemotherapy ± radiotherapy had similar efficacy to chemoradiotherapy in improving patients' LCSS and OS (all P>0.05), and lobectomy plus postoperative chemotherapy ± radiotherapy did not significantly improve LCSS or OS compared with lobectomy (all P>0.05). Conclusions: For stage II-IIIa SCLC patients, lobectomy might have similar efficacy to chemoradiotherapy in improving LCSS and OS, and there is no need for adjuvant chemotherapy ± radiotherapy after surgery. For stage I SCLC patients, lobectomy plus postoperative chemoradiotherapy might be superior to chemoradiotherapy or lobectomy in improving LCSS and OS; however, the conclusion might be biased. These results suggest that the effect of surgery on SCLC patients may be worthy of further study.