Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Immediate Versus Staged Complete Revascularization in Patients Presenting with Acute Coronary Syndrome and Multivessel Coronary Disease Without Cardiac Shock: A Study-Level Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Zhou, Ye Ming; Sun, Bing.
Afiliação
  • Zhou YM; Department of Emergency, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
  • Sun B; Department of Cardiology, Tang Du Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'An, Shaanxi, China. 337186632@qq.com.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38884921
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Achieving full revascularization via percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may enhance the prognosis of individuals diagnosed with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and multivessel coronary disease (MVD). The present work focused on investigating whether PCI should be performed during staged or index procedures for non-culprit lesions.

METHODS:

Electronic databases, such as PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, were systematically explored to locate studies contrasting immediate revascularization with staged complete revascularization for patients who experienced ACS and MVD without cardiac shock. The outcome measures comprised major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and unplanned ischemia-driven revascularization (UIDR).

RESULTS:

Nine randomized controlled trials involving 3550 patients, including 1780 who received immediate complete revascularization (ICR) and 1770 who received staged complete revascularization (SCR), were included in the analysis. The ICR group had lower MACEs (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.61~0.87, P = 0.0004), MI (RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.37~0.77, P = 0.0008), and UIDR (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.50~0.81, P = 0.0003) than did the SCR group. All-cause mortality, CVD incidence, and stroke incidence did not significantly differ between the two groups. According to our subgroup analyses based on the time window of the SCR, the ICR group had significantly fewer MACEs (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.56~0.88, P = 0.003), MI (RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.37~0.77, P = 0.0002), and UIDR (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.40~0.77, P = 0.0004) than did the subgroup of patients who were between discharge and 45 days.

CONCLUSION:

Compared with patients in the SCR group, patients in the ICR group had decreased MACEs, MI, and UIDR, especially between discharge and 45 days. All-cause mortality and CVD incidence were not significantly different between the two groups.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Cardiovasc Drugs Ther Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Cardiovasc Drugs Ther Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article