Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
"Catheter replacement in catheter-associated urinary tract infection: current state of evidence ".
Westgeest, Annette C; van Uhm, Janneke I M; Pattacini, Laura; Rozemeijer, Wouter; Schout, Barbara M A; Groenwold, Rolf H H; Geerlings, Suzanne E; Lambregts, Merel M C.
Afiliação
  • Westgeest AC; Department of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, Leiden, 2333ZA, Netherlands.
  • van Uhm JIM; Department of Urology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
  • Pattacini L; Department of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, Leiden, 2333ZA, Netherlands.
  • Rozemeijer W; Department of Medical Microbiology, Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, Netherlands.
  • Schout BMA; Department of Urology, Alrijne Ziekenhuis, Leiderdorp, Netherlands.
  • Groenwold RHH; Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
  • Geerlings SE; Department of Internal Medicine, Division Infectious Diseases, Amsterdam Institute Infection and Immunity, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  • Lambregts MMC; Department of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, Leiden, 2333ZA, Netherlands. m.m.c.lambregts@lumc.nl.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 43(8): 1631-1637, 2024 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38916643
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Catheter associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) is the most common healthcare associated infection. A significant knowledge gap exists regarding the necessity of catheter replacement as part of CAUTI treatment. Current guidelines recommend replacement for faster recovery and to prevent recurrences, but adherence is low. In this systematic review, we aimed to assess the available evidence regarding catheter replacement for CAUTI. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Eligible studies investigated the effect of catheter replacement in CAUTI on clinical outcomes and/or recurrence rates, irrespective of catheter type or setting. We searched electronic literature databases from inception to October 15th, 2023. Information was extracted regarding setting, eligibility criteria, definition of CAUTI, timing of replacement, and outcomes.

RESULTS:

Of the 257 identified studies, four were considered relevant and included. Two were randomized controlled trials (RCT) and two were observational studies. One RCT showed higher rates of clinical recovery and lower recurrence rates in the replacement group, while results of the other RCT favoured retainment, with a lower recurrence rate in the retainment group, although longer antimicrobial treatment in this group. Two observational studies were inconclusive.

CONCLUSIONS:

Current guidelines rely heavily on recommendations from a single study, emphasizing the need for further research. The burden of catheter replacement, including patient discomfort and resource impact, warrants careful consideration. A randomized trial is essential to provide more evidence on the effect of catheter replacement on clinical outcomes including CAUTI recurrence.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções Urinárias / Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções Urinárias / Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article