Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Exploring Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Management Practice Patterns Among Oncology Clinicians.
Kanzawa-Lee, Grace; Krauss, John C; Knoerl, Robert.
Afiliação
  • Kanzawa-Lee G; School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. Electronic address: jkrauss@med.umich.edu.
  • Krauss JC; Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
  • Knoerl R; School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Semin Oncol Nurs ; 40(5): 151685, 2024 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38937199
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Approximately 60% of cancer survivors receiving neurotoxic chemotherapy experience chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) (eg, hand and foot numbness, tingling, or pain). There is only one recommended pharmacological treatment (duloxetine) and one modestly beneficial nonpharmacological treatment (exercise) for CIPN. However, data suggest national guideline recommendations are not routinely practiced. Further, less is known about nurses' CIPN management practices. The purpose of this convergent mixed methods study was to explore oncology clinicians' self-reported practices and perceptions regarding CIPN prevention and management.

METHODS:

Oncology clinicians at three cancer centers completed a survey about their recommendations for CIPN prevention and management in practice. A subset of clinicians also participated in a semi-structured interview to explore their perspectives of and motivations for implementing CIPN assessment, prevention, and management in practice. Quantitative data were described (eg, frequency or median) and qualitative data were analyzed using inductive content analysis.

RESULTS:

This study (N = 44 survey responses; n = 9 interviews) resulted in four themes (1) clinicians primarily recommend gabapentin for CIPN management and often observe cryotherapy used for CIPN prevention, but these interventions are complicated by discomfort, intolerable side effects, and efficacy concerns; (2) clinicians perceive CIPN as troublesome and desire additional information and resources regarding CIPN prevention and management; (3) CIPN-related education provided by clinicians may be limited by patient retention of the amount of education received about cancer treatment and other factors; (4) clinicians use subjective CIPN assessment to screen at each visit for common CIPN symptoms (eg, numbness or tingling) and the impact of symptoms on day-to-day activities.

CONCLUSIONS:

Discrepancies persist between evidence-based guidelines on CIPN management and current oncology clinician practices. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE Clinician involvement is needed when developing education and resources to help oncology clinicians provide the most evidence-based care to potentially prevent and manage their patients' CIPN.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Padrões de Prática Médica / Doenças do Sistema Nervoso Periférico / Antineoplásicos Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Semin Oncol Nurs Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Padrões de Prática Médica / Doenças do Sistema Nervoso Periférico / Antineoplásicos Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Semin Oncol Nurs Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article