Head-to-Head Comparison of Caco-2 Transwell and Gut-on-a-Chip Models for Assessing Oral Peptide Formulations.

ABSTRACT

Oral delivery of potent peptide drugs provides key formulation challenges in the pharmaceutical industry stability, solubility, and permeability. Intestinal permeation enhancers (PEs) can overcome the low oral bioavailability by improving the drug permeability. Conventional in vitro and ex vivo models for assessing PEs fail to predict efficacy in vivo. Here, we compared Caco-2 cells cultured in the conventional static Transwell model to a commercially available continuous flow microfluidic Gut-on-a-Chip model. We determined baseline permeability of FITC-Dextan 3 kDa (FD3) in Transwell (5.3 ± 0.8 × 10-8 cm/s) vs Chip (3.2 ± 1.8 × 10-7 cm/s). We screened the concentration impact of two established PEs sodium caprate and sucrose monolaurate and indicated a requirement for higher enhancer concentration in the Chip model to elicit equivalent efficacy e.g., 10 mM sodium caprate in Transwells vs 25 mM in Chips. Fasted and fed state simulated intestinal fluids (FaSSIF/FeSSIF) were introduced into the Chip and increased basal FD3 permeability by 3-fold and 20-fold, respectively, compared to 4-fold and 4000-fold in Transwells. We assessed the utility of this model to peptides (Insulin and Octreotide) with PEs and observed much more modest permeability enhancement in the Chip model in line with observations in ex vivo and in vivo preclinical models. These data indicate that microfluidic Chip models are well suited to bridge the gap between conventional in vitro and in vivo models.