Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Psychological Characteristics and Quality of Life of Patients With Functional Dyspepsia.
Lee, Su-Woo; Yang, Chan-Mo; Ryu, Han-Seung; Choi, Suck-Chei; Lee, Sang-Yeol; Jang, Seung-Ho.
Afiliação
  • Lee SW; Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Wonkwang University, Iksan, Republic of Korea.
  • Yang CM; Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Wonkwang University, Iksan, Republic of Korea.
  • Ryu HS; Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Wonkwang University, Iksan, Republic of Korea.
  • Choi SC; Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Wonkwang University, Iksan, Republic of Korea.
  • Lee SY; Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Wonkwang University, Iksan, Republic of Korea.
  • Jang SH; Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Wonkwang University, Iksan, Republic of Korea.
Psychiatry Investig ; 21(6): 637-645, 2024 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38960441
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The objective of this study is to compare the psychosocial characteristics of functional dyspepsia (FD) with its subgroups, epigastric pain syndrome (EPS) and postprandial distress syndrome (PDS), against a healthy control group, and to investigate the quality of life (QoL).

METHODS:

All of the subjects were 210 adults, 131 patients with FD were diagnosed by gastroenterologist and 79 adults with no observable symptoms of FD were selected as the normal control group. Demographic factors were investigated. The Korean-Beck Depression Inventory-II, Korean-Beck Anxiety Inventory, Korean-Childhood Trauma Questionnaire, Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support, Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, and WHO Quality of Life Assessment Instrument Brief Form were used to assess psychological factors. A one-way analysis of variance was used to compare differences among the groups. Further, a stepwise regression analysis was conducted to determine factors affecting the QoL of the FD group.

RESULTS:

Between-group differences in demographic characteristics were not significant. Depression (F=37.166, p<0.001), anxiety (F=30.261, p<0.001), and childhood trauma (F=6.591, p<0.01) were all significantly higher in FD group compared to the normal control. Among FD subgroups, EPS exhibited higher levels of both depression and anxiety than PDS. Social support (F=17.673, p<0.001) and resilience (F=8.425, p<0.001) were significantly lower in FD group than in other groups, and the values were higher in PDS than in EPS. Resilience (ß=0.328, p<0.001) was the most important explanatory variable. The explained variance was 46.6%.

CONCLUSION:

Significantly more symptoms of depression, anxiety, childhood trauma was observed for both FD sub-group. These groups also had less social support, resilience, and QoL than the control groups.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Psychiatry Investig Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Psychiatry Investig Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article