Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Next-generation risk assessment read-across case study: application of a 10-step framework to derive a safe concentration of daidzein in a body lotion.
Najjar, Abdulkarim; Kühnl, Jochen; Lange, Daniela; Géniès, Camille; Jacques, Carine; Fabian, Eric; Zifle, Anne; Hewitt, Nicola J; Schepky, Andreas.
Afiliação
  • Najjar A; Beiersdorf AG, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Kühnl J; Beiersdorf AG, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Lange D; Beiersdorf AG, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Géniès C; Pierre Fabre Dermo-Cosmétique and Personal CareToulouse, Toulouse, France.
  • Jacques C; Pierre Fabre Dermo-Cosmétique and Personal CareToulouse, Toulouse, France.
  • Fabian E; BASF SE, Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Germany.
  • Zifle A; Kao Germany GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany.
  • Hewitt NJ; Cosmetics Europe, Auderghem, Belgium.
  • Schepky A; Beiersdorf AG, Hamburg, Germany.
Front Pharmacol ; 15: 1421601, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38962304
ABSTRACT

Introduction:

We performed an exposure-based Next Generation Risk Assessment case read-across study using New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) to determine the highest safe concentration of daidzein in a body lotion, based on its similarities with its structural analogue, genistein. Two assumptions were (1) daidzein is a new chemical and its dietary intake omitted; (2) only in vitro data were used for daidzein, while in vitro and legacy in vivo data for genistein were considered.

Methods:

The 10-step tiered approach evaluating systemic toxicity included toxicokinetics NAMs PBPK models and in vitro biokinetics measurements in cells used for toxicogenomics and toxicodynamic NAMs pharmacology profiling (i.e., interaction with molecular targets), toxicogenomics and EATS assays (endocrine disruption endpoints). Whole body rat and human PBPK models were used to convert external doses of genistein to plasma concentrations and in vitro Points of Departure (PoD) to external doses. The PBPK human dermal module was refined using in vitro human skin metabolism and penetration data.

Results:

The most relevant endpoint for daidzein was from the ERα assay (Lowest Observed Effective Concentration was 100 ± 0.0 nM), which was converted to an in vitro PoD of 33 nM. After application of a safety factor of 3.3 for intra-individual variability, the safe concentration of daidzein was estimated to be 10 nM. This was extrapolated to an external dose of 0.5 µg/cm2 for a body lotion and face cream, equating to a concentration of 0.1%.

Discussion:

When in vitro PoD of 33 nM for daidzein was converted to an external oral dose in rats, the value correlated with the in vivo NOAEL. This increased confidence that the rat oral PBPK model provided accurate estimates of internal and external exposure and that the in vitro PoD was relevant in the safety assessment of both chemicals. When plasma concentrations estimated from applications of 0.1% and 0.02% daidzein were used to calculate bioactivity exposure ratios, values were >1, indicating a good margin between exposure and concentrations causing adverse effects. In conclusion, this case study highlights the use of NAMs in a 10-step tiered workflow to conclude that the highest safe concentration of daidzein in a body lotion is 0.1%.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Front Pharmacol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Front Pharmacol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article