Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effects of technological running shoes versus barefoot running on the intrinsic foot muscles, ankle mobility, and dynamic control: a novel cross-sectional research.
García-Arrabé, María; Batuecas-Sánchez, Iván; de Vidania, Silvia; Bravo-Aguilar, María; Ruiz-Ruiz, Beatriz; Romero-Morales, Carlos.
Afiliação
  • García-Arrabé M; Faculty of Sport Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Villaviciosa de Odón, Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: maria.gararrabe@universidadeuropea.es.
  • Batuecas-Sánchez I; Faculty of Sport Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Villaviciosa de Odón, Madrid, Spain.
  • de Vidania S; Faculty of Sport Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Villaviciosa de Odón, Madrid, Spain.
  • Bravo-Aguilar M; Faculty of Sport Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Villaviciosa de Odón, Madrid, Spain.
  • Ruiz-Ruiz B; Faculty of Sport Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Villaviciosa de Odón, Madrid, Spain.
  • Romero-Morales C; Faculty of Sport Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Villaviciosa de Odón, Madrid, Spain.
Braz J Phys Ther ; 28(4): 101092, 2024 Jun 16.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38964202
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Technological running shoes have become increasingly popular, leading to improvements in performance. However, their long-term effects on foot musculature and joint mobility have not been thoroughly studied.

OBJECTIVE:

To compare the activation of the intrinsic foot muscles between runners wearing technological footwear and barefoot runners. Secondary objectives included assessing ankle dorsiflexion (DF) range of motion (ROM) and dynamic postural control in both groups.

METHODS:

A cross-sectional study was conducted involving 22 technological footwear runners and 22 barefoot runners. Ultrasonography was used to measure the thickness of the plantar fascia (PF) and the quadratus plantae (QP), abductor digiti minimus (ADM), abductor hallucis (AH), and flexor hallucis longus (FHL) muscles. Ankle mobility and dynamic postural control were also recorded.

RESULTS:

Ultrasonography measurements showed statistically significant differences for PF thickness (mean difference [MD] -0.10 cm; 95% CI -0.13, -0.05 cm), QP cross-sectional area (CSA) (MD -0.45 cm2; 95% CI -0.77, -0.12 cm2), ADM CSA (MD -0.49 cm2; 95% CI -0.70, -0.17 cm2), and FHL thickness (MD 0.82 cm; 95% CI 0.53, 1.09 cm), with all measurements being lower in the group wearing technological footwear compared to the barefoot runners. Ankle DF ROM was also significantly greater for the barefoot runners (MD -5.1°; 95% CI -8.6, -1.7°).

CONCLUSIONS:

These findings suggest potential implications for the foot musculature and ankle mobility in runners using technological footwear.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Braz J Phys Ther Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Braz J Phys Ther Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article