Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Recommendations for Updating Fever and Inflammation of Unknown Origin From a Modified Delphi Consensus Panel.
Wright, William F; Stelmash, Lauren; Betrains, Albrecht; Mulders-Manders, Catharina M; Rovers, Chantal P; Vanderschueren, Steven; Auwaerter, Paul G.
Afiliação
  • Wright WF; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • Stelmash L; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • Betrains A; General Internal Medicine department, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Mulders-Manders CM; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • Rovers CP; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • Vanderschueren S; General Internal Medicine Department, Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Transplantation, Laboratory of Clinical Infectious and Inflammatory Disorders, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Auwaerter PG; The Sherrilyn and Ken Fisher Center for Environmental Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 11(7): ofae298, 2024 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38966848
ABSTRACT

Background:

Fever of unknown origin (FUO) and inflammation of unknown origin (IUO) are syndromes commonly used as medical diagnoses. Since the existing literature has a mixture of diagnostic approaches, developing consensus-based recommendations would be helpful for clinicians, researchers, and patients.

Methods:

A modified Delphi process was performed from October 2022 to July 2023, involving 4 rounds of online surveys and 2 live video conferences. The panel comprised international experts recruited based on peer-reviewed published publications and studies.

Results:

Among 50 invited experts, 26 (52.0%) agreed to participate. Twenty-three panelists completed round 1 of the survey, 21 completed rounds 2 and 3, 20 completed round 4, and 7 participated in round 5 live video discussions. Of the participants, 18 (78.3%) were academic-based clinicians and researchers, 5 (21.7%) practiced in a community-based hospital, and 6 (26.1%) were female. Consensus was reached on 5 themes (1) incorporating epidemiologic factors, such as geographic location and travel history; (2) updated criteria for classifying FUO or IUO; (3) initial evaluation approaches; (4) a classification system for diagnoses; and (5) recommendations for judicious limitation of empiric therapies. Experts strongly disagreed with using 2-deoxy-2-[18F] fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography as part of the diagnostic criteria for FUO. There were mixed opinions about the importance of the temperature measurement site, the 3-week minimum illness criterion, the need for a standard definition of relapsing fevers, and the use of similar evaluation strategies for FUO and IUO.

Conclusions:

These Delphi-generated consensus-based recommendations offer potential improvements compared with earlier definitions and a guide for clinical practice and future research.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Open Forum Infect Dis Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Open Forum Infect Dis Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article