Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluating Renal Benefits of Rivaroxaban Versus Vitamin K Antagonists in Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Real-world Evidence.
Dinh, Phong Phan; Quang Ho, Tri Huynh; Pham, Hung Manh; Nguyen, Hai Hoang; Ton, Minh That; Tran, Giang Song; Vu, Nga Quynh; Pham, Hung Nhu; Cao, Son Luong; Hoang, Sy Van.
Afiliação
  • Dinh PP; Vietnam National Heart Institute, Bach Mai Hospital Hanoi, Vietnam.
  • Quang Ho TH; Hanoi Medical University Hanoi, Vietnam.
  • Pham HM; Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Heart Institute Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
  • Nguyen HH; Vietnam National Heart Institute, Bach Mai Hospital Hanoi, Vietnam.
  • Ton MT; Hanoi Medical University Hanoi, Vietnam.
  • Tran GS; Nhan Dan Gia Dinh Hospital Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
  • Vu NQ; Tam Duc Heart Hospital Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
  • Pham HN; Vietnam National Heart Institute, Bach Mai Hospital Hanoi, Vietnam.
  • Cao SL; Hanoi Heart Hospital Hanoi, Vietnam.
  • Hoang SV; Hanoi Heart Hospital Hanoi, Vietnam.
Eur Cardiol ; 19: e05, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38983579
ABSTRACT

Background:

AF is a global health concern, with systemic complications including renal dysfunction. This systematic review and meta-analysis compares the effects of rivaroxaban, a Factor Xa inhibitor, and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) on renal outcomes in AF patients.

Methods:

The study protocol is registered in PROSPERO (ID CRD42023462756). We systematically searched the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases from 1 January 2017 to 30 June 2023 for real-world studies comparing the effects of rivaroxaban and VKAs on renal outcomes in AF patients, including acute kidney injury, a .30% decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate, doubling of serum creatinine and worsening renal function. Subgroup analyses targeted diabetes, pre-existing kidney disease, the elderly (age .65 years) and Asian populations. The risk of bias was assessed used the Robins-I tool. HRs and 95% CIs were synthesised through a random-effects model. Two sensitivity analyses were performed, using a fixed-effects model and excluding conference abstracts.

Results:

We identified 1,666 records. After screening, 14 studies comparing rivaroxaban and VKAs were included. Rivaroxaban exhibited superiority over VKAs in preventing acute kidney injury (HR 0.68; 95% CI [0.61.0.77]; p<0.00001); a .30% decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate (HR 0.71; 95% CI [0.60.0.84]; p<0.0001); doubling of serum creatinine (HR 0.50; 95% CI [0.36.0.70]; p<0.0001); and worsening renal function (HR 0.56; 95% CI [0.45.0.69]; p<0.00001). Subgroup and sensitivity analyses consistently confirmed rivaroxaban's favourable effects on renal outcomes in diabetes, pre-existing kidney disease, the elderly and Asian populations.

Conclusion:

Our findings support the preference of rivaroxaban over VKAs for renal outcomes in AF. The findings endorse rivaroxaban as the preferred anticoagulant to mitigate renal complications, offering clinicians valuable insights for tailored strategies.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Eur Cardiol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Eur Cardiol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article