Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Retention of the posterior cruciate ligament stabilizes the medial femoral condyle during kneeling using a tibial insert with ball-in-socket medial conformity.
Harbison, Greg; O'Donnell, Ed; Elorza, Saul; Howell, S M; Hull, M L.
Afiliação
  • Harbison G; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA.
  • O'Donnell E; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA.
  • Elorza S; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
  • Howell SM; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
  • Hull ML; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA. mlhull@ucdavis.edu.
Int Orthop ; 48(9): 2395-2401, 2024 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38997513
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Resecting the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) increases posterior laxity and increases the flexion gap more than the extension gap in the native (i.e. healthy) knee. These two effects could lead to significant anterior displacement of the medial femoral condyle in kneeling following total knee arthroplasty even when using a tibial insert with a high degree of medial conformity. Using an insert with ball-in-socket medial conformity and a flat lateral articular surface, the primary purpose was to determine whether the medial femoral condyle remained stable with and without PCL retention during kneeling.

METHODS:

Two groups of patients were studied, one with PCL retention (22 patients) and the other with PCL resection (25 patients), while kneeling at 90º flexion. Following 3D model-to-2D image registration, A-P displacements of both femoral condyles were determined relative to the dwell point of the medial socket.

RESULTS:

With PCL resection versus PCL retention, the medial femoral condyle was 5.1 ± 3.7 mm versus 0.8 ± 2.1 mm anterior of the dwell point (p < 0.0001). Patient-reported function scores were comparable (p ≥ 0.1610) despite a significantly shorter follow-up of 7.8 ± 0.9 months with PCL retention than 19.6 ± 4.9 months with PCL resection (p < 0.0001). Range of motion was 126 ± 8° versus 122 ± 6° with and without PCL retention, respectively (p = 0.057).

CONCLUSION:

Surgeons that use a highly conforming tibial insert design can stabilize the medial femoral condyle during kneeling by retaining the PCL. In patients with PCL resection, the 9 mm high anterior lip of the insert with ball-in-socket medial conformity was insufficient to prevent significant anterior displacement of the medial femoral condyle when weight-bearing on the anterior tibia.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tíbia / Ligamento Cruzado Posterior / Amplitude de Movimento Articular / Artroplastia do Joelho / Fêmur / Articulação do Joelho / Prótese do Joelho Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Int Orthop Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tíbia / Ligamento Cruzado Posterior / Amplitude de Movimento Articular / Artroplastia do Joelho / Fêmur / Articulação do Joelho / Prótese do Joelho Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Int Orthop Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article