Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Turnout Gap in Surveys: Explanations and Solutions.
DeBell, Matthew; Krosnick, Jon A; Gera, Katie; Yeager, David S; McDonald, Michael P.
Afiliação
  • DeBell M; Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
  • Krosnick JA; Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
  • Gera K; Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
  • Yeager DS; University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
  • McDonald MP; University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Sociol Methods Res ; 49(4): 1133-1162, 2020 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39006982
ABSTRACT
Postelection surveys regularly overestimate voter turnout by 10 points or more. This article provides the first comprehensive documentation of the turnout gap in three major ongoing surveys (the General Social Survey, Current Population Survey, and American National Election Studies), evaluates explanations for it, interprets its significance, and suggests means to continue evaluating and improving survey measurements of turnout. Accuracy was greater in face-to-face than telephone interviews, consistent with the notion that the former mode engages more respondent effort with less social desirability bias. Accuracy was greater when respondents were asked about the most recent election, consistent with the hypothesis that forgetting creates errors. Question wordings designed to minimize source confusion and social desirability bias improved accuracy. Rates of reported turnout were lower with proxy reports than with self-reports, which may suggest greater accuracy of proxy reports. People who do not vote are less likely to participate in surveys than voters are.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Sociol Methods Res Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Sociol Methods Res Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article