Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Systematic review of disparities in continuous glucose monitoring and insulin pump utilization in the United States: Key themes and evidentiary gaps.
Patel, Pranav M; Thomas, Divya; Liu, Zhixi; Aldrich-Renner, Sarah; Clemons, Marilee; Patel, Bimal V.
Afiliação
  • Patel PM; University of Toledo College of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Toledo, Ohio, USA.
  • Thomas D; University of Toledo College of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Toledo, Ohio, USA.
  • Liu Z; University of Toledo College of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Toledo, Ohio, USA.
  • Aldrich-Renner S; University of Toledo General Internal Medicine Clinic and College of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Toledo, Ohio, USA.
  • Clemons M; University of Toledo General Internal Medicine Clinic and College of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Toledo, Ohio, USA.
  • Patel BV; Tandem Diabetes Care, San Diego, California, USA.
Diabetes Obes Metab ; 26(10): 4293-4301, 2024 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39010293
ABSTRACT

AIM:

This study aims to provide a comprehensive overview of real-world evidence pertaining to disparities in the utilization of continuous glucose monitors (CGMs)/insulin pumps to highlight potential evidentiary gaps and discern emerging themes from the literature. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

A systematic review of published manuscripts and abstracts was conducted from MEDLINE, EMBASE, Nursing and Allied Health, Web of Science and CINHAL. Attributes related to patients, outcomes, interventions (CGMs/pumps/both) and study type were captured. In addition, factors associated with disparities in device utilization were examined.

RESULTS:

Thirty-six studies were included in the final analysis; the studies predominantly focused on people living with type 1 diabetes. Only two studies included individuals with type 2 diabetes. Almost two-thirds of the studies reported outcomes associated with disparities (e.g. glycated haemoglobin, diabetic ketoacidosis, resource utilization). Most studies highlighted disparities across race, ethnicity and insurance type. Evidentiary gaps were identified, particularly in the evidence for people with type 2 diabetes, the continuation of CGM/pump use and limited studies addressing disparities among Native Americans/American Indians.

CONCLUSION:

This study reveals critical disparities in diabetes technology use across race, ethnicity and insurance type, particularly among people with type 1 diabetes. Evidentiary gaps assessing disparities in diabetes technology use persist, particularly concerning people with type 2 diabetes, Native American/American Indian and LGBTQ+ populations, and in outcomes related to continuation of use. Social and digital determinants of health, such as income, transportation, residential location and technological literacy, are crucial to achieving equitable access. Future research should focus on the patient journey to identify opportunities for equitable access to diabetes technology as its use grows.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Sistemas de Infusão de Insulina / Automonitorização da Glicemia / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Diabetes Obes Metab Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Sistemas de Infusão de Insulina / Automonitorização da Glicemia / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Diabetes Obes Metab Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article