Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of healthcare interventions on distress following acute musculoskeletal/orthopaedic injury: a scoping review of systematic reviews.
Sim, Alison; McNeilage, Amy Gray; Gholamrezaei, Ali; Rebbeck, Trudy; Ashton-James, Claire.
Afiliação
  • Sim A; The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia alison.sim@sydney.edu.au.
  • McNeilage AG; The University of Sydney, St Leonard, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Gholamrezaei A; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney - Camperdown and Darlington Campus, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Rebbeck T; Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Ashton-James C; Pain Management, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
BMJ Open ; 14(7): e085778, 2024 Jul 18.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39025825
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Musculoskeletal injuries can cause distress, and distress is associated with delayed recovery. Numerous interventions have been developed to facilitate recovery from injury, and several systematic reviews evaluate the efficacy of these interventions for reducing psychological distress.

OBJECTIVES:

This scoping review aims to map the synthesised evidence for the relationship between treatment interventions and distress-related outcomes following acute injury. The objectives were (1) to describe the types of interventions that have been evaluated in relation to distress-related outcomes following accidental injury, (2) to examine the scope of distress-related outcomes that have been measured in relation to these interventions and (3) to explore the range of clinical professions that deliver these interventions.

DESIGN:

We searched nine electronic databases and grey literature (to 21 April 2022). We included any systematic review reporting on the relationship between interventions delivered in the time following injury and distress-related outcomes. Data relevant to the specific objectives of this scoping review were extracted and described using narrative synthesis.

RESULTS:

From 8412 systematic reviews imported for screening, 8266 unique records were screened. 179 were selected for full-text review. 84 systematic reviews were included in the study. Interventional types were pharmacological, psychological, exercise based, physical/manual therapies, virtual reality based, multimodal and workplace based. Interventions were delivered digitally, face to face and using virtual reality by a variety of healthcare professionals, including doctors, nurses, psychologists and physiotherapists. The most frequently reported distress-related variables included anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder diagnosis.

CONCLUSION:

A wide range of interventions may help to mitigate distress following acute accidental musculoskeletal or orthopaedic injury. Even interventions that were not designed to reduce distress were found to improve distress-related outcomes. In view of the important role of distress in recovery from injury, it is recommended that distress-related variables are measured as core outcomes in the evaluation of treatments for acute injuries.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Revisões Sistemáticas como Assunto Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Revisões Sistemáticas como Assunto Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article