Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of Matrix Size and Acquisition Mode on Image Quality and Radiation Dose of Ultra-High-Resolution CT of the Temporal Bone: An Anatomical Study.
Puel, Ulysse; Eliezer, Michael; Boubaker, Fatma; Villani, Nicolas; Assabah, Bouchra; Hossu, Gabriela; Gondim Teixeira, Pedro Augusto; Blum, Alain; Parietti-Winkler, Cécile; Gillet, Romain.
Afiliação
  • Puel U; Guilloz Imaging Department, Central Hospital, University Hospital Center of Nancy, Nancy, France.
  • Eliezer M; Université de Lorraine, INSERM, IADI, Nancy, France.
  • Boubaker F; Université de Lorraine, CIC, Innovation Technologique, University Hospital Center of Nancy, Nancy, France.
  • Villani N; Department of Radiology, Lariboisière Hospital, Paris, France.
  • Assabah B; Guilloz Imaging Department, Central Hospital, University Hospital Center of Nancy, Nancy, France.
  • Hossu G; Guilloz Imaging Department, Central Hospital, University Hospital Center of Nancy, Nancy, France.
  • Gondim Teixeira PA; Department of Anatomy, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France.
  • Blum A; Université de Lorraine, INSERM, IADI, Nancy, France.
  • Parietti-Winkler C; Université de Lorraine, CIC, Innovation Technologique, University Hospital Center of Nancy, Nancy, France.
  • Gillet R; Guilloz Imaging Department, Central Hospital, University Hospital Center of Nancy, Nancy, France.
Can Assoc Radiol J ; 75(3): 609-619, 2024 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39086146
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

To compare image quality and radiation exposure between super- and ultra-high-resolution helical and super-high-resolution volumetric CT of the temporal bone.

Methods:

Six cadaveric temporal bone specimens were used to evaluate key temporal bone structures using the following CT reconstruction and acquisition modes helical and single-volume acquisition modes in super-high resolution (0.25-mm slice thickness, 10242 matrix), and helical mode in ultra-high resolution (0.25-mm slice thickness, 20482 matrix). Two observers performed 5 previously described preoperative measurements, measured noise and signal-to-noise ratios for air, and noise for bone, and rated the visualization of 5 anatomical structures on a 4-point scale, for each reconstruction mode. Radiation dose exposure was recorded for each examination.

Results:

There was no significant difference between any of the quantitative or qualitative measurements in any of the reconstruction and acquisition modes. There was a slight increase in noise and a decrease in signal-to-noise ratio in the air using the single-volume mode (115 ± 13.1 HU and 8.37 ± 0.91, respectively) compared to the helicoidal super-high-resolution (92.4 ± 11.8 HU and 10.8 ± 1.26, respectively) and helicoidal ultra-high-resolution (91.1 ± 10.7 HU and 10.9 ± 1.39, respectively) modes (P < .002). The volumic CT dose index was 50.9 mGy with helical acquisition and 29.8 mGy with single-volume acquisition mode (P < .0001).

Conclusion:

The single-volume super-high-resolution acquisition mode allows a reduction in radiation dose exposure without compromising image quality compared to helical scanning, but with a slightly lower signal-to-noise ratio in air with the single-volume mode, while there was no difference in image quality between the helical super- and ultra-high-resolution modes.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doses de Radiação / Osso Temporal / Cadáver / Razão Sinal-Ruído Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Can Assoc Radiol J Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doses de Radiação / Osso Temporal / Cadáver / Razão Sinal-Ruído Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Can Assoc Radiol J Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article