Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
International Benchmark for Total Metabolic Tumor Volume Measurement in Baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT of Lymphoma Patients: A Milestone Toward Clinical Implementation.
Boellaard, Ronald; Buvat, Irène; Nioche, Christophe; Ceriani, Luca; Cottereau, Anne-Ségolène; Guerra, Luca; Hicks, Rodney J; Kanoun, Salim; Kobe, Carsten; Loft, Annika; Schöder, Heiko; Versari, Annibale; Voltin, Conrad-Amadeus; Zwezerijnen, Gerben J C; Zijlstra, Josée M; Mikhaeel, N George; Gallamini, Andrea; El-Galaly, Tarec C; Hanoun, Christine; Chauvie, Stephane; Ricci, Romain; Zucca, Emanuele; Meignan, Michel; Barrington, Sally F.
Afiliação
  • Boellaard R; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; r.boellaard@amsterdamumc.nl.
  • Buvat I; LITO, Inserm, Institut Curie, Orsay, France.
  • Nioche C; LITO, Inserm, Institut Curie, Orsay, France.
  • Ceriani L; Clinic of Nuclear Medicine and PET-CT Centre, Imaging Institute of Southern Switzerland; and EOC, Institute of Oncology Research, Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Bellinzona, Switzerland.
  • Cottereau AS; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cochin Hospital, APHP; and Faculté de Médecine, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
  • Guerra L; Nuclear Medicine Unit, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Monza, Italy.
  • Hicks RJ; School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
  • Kanoun S; Department of Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital Medical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Kobe C; Centre de Recherche Clinique de Toulouse, Team 9, Toulouse, France.
  • Loft A; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
  • Schöder H; PET & Cyclotron Unit 3982, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Versari A; Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
  • Voltin CA; Nuclear Medicine Department, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
  • Zwezerijnen GJC; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
  • Zijlstra JM; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Mikhaeel NG; Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Gallamini A; Department of Clinical Oncology, Guy's Cancer Centre and School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London University, London, United Kingdom.
  • El-Galaly TC; Research and Innovation Department, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center, Nice, France.
  • Hanoun C; Department of Hematology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
  • Chauvie S; Department of Hematology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
  • Ricci R; Department of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
  • Zucca E; Medical Physics Division, Santa Croce e Carle Hospital, Cuneo, Italy.
  • Meignan M; LYSARC, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Pierre-Bénite, France.
  • Barrington SF; Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland; and EOC, Institute of Oncology Research, Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Bellinzona, Switzerland; and.
J Nucl Med ; 2024 Aug 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39089812
ABSTRACT
Total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV) is prognostic in lymphoma. However, cutoff values for risk stratification vary markedly, according to the tumor delineation method used. We aimed to create a standardized TMTV benchmark dataset allowing TMTV to be tested and applied as a reproducible biomarker.

Methods:

Sixty baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT scans were identified with a range of disease distributions (20 follicular, 20 Hodgkin, and 20 diffuse large B-cell lymphoma). TMTV was measured by 12 nuclear medicine experts, each analyzing 20 cases split across subtypes, with each case processed by 3-4 readers. LIFEx or ACCURATE software was chosen according to reader preference. Analysis was performed stepwise TMTV1 with automated preselection of lesions using an SUV of at least 4 and a volume of at least 3 cm3 with single-click removal of physiologic uptake; TMTV2 with additional removal of reactive bone marrow and spleen with single clicks; TMTV3 with manual editing to remove other physiologic uptake, if required; and TMTV4 with optional addition of lesions using mouse clicks with an SUV of at least 4 (no volume threshold).

Results:

The final TMTV (TMTV4) ranged from 8 to 2,288 cm3, showing excellent agreement among all readers in 87% of cases (52/60) with a difference of less than 10% or less than 10 cm3 In 70% of the cases, TMTV4 equaled TMTV1, requiring no additional reader interaction. Differences in the TMTV4 were exclusively related to reader interpretation of lesion inclusion or physiologic high-uptake region removal, not to the choice of software. For 5 cases, large TMTV differences (>25%) were due to disagreement about inclusion of diffuse splenic uptake.

Conclusion:

The proposed segmentation method enabled highly reproducible TMTV measurements, with minimal reader interaction in 70% of the patients. The inclusion or exclusion of diffuse splenic uptake requires definition of specific criteria according to lymphoma subtype. The publicly available proposed benchmark allows comparison of study results and could serve as a reference to test improvements using other segmentation approaches.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Nucl Med Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Nucl Med Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article