Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Comparative Study on Aesthetic and Pain Outcomes in Flap Versus Implant Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy.
Aleman Paredes, Kenneth; Castillo, Jennifer V; Montelongo Quevedo, Mauricio; Ocejo, Arantza; Vázquez Lechuga, Héctor A; Navarro Camara, Karime M; Ponce Figueroa, Daniela; Falcón García, Diana K; Nolasco Mendoza, Carina L; Castillo, Jaqueline L; Victoria Enriquez, Jose A; Flores Valdés, Jose R.
Afiliação
  • Aleman Paredes K; Surgery, Hospital General Regional No. 220 "José Vicente Villada", Toluca, MEX.
  • Castillo JV; General Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, MEX.
  • Montelongo Quevedo M; General Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, MEX.
  • Ocejo A; Gynecology, Universidad Autónoma de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, MEX.
  • Vázquez Lechuga HA; Medicine and Nutrition, Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango, Durango, MEX.
  • Navarro Camara KM; Surgery, Universidad Autónoma de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, MEX.
  • Ponce Figueroa D; General Medicine, Instituto de Estudios Superiores de Tamaulipas, Tampico, MEX.
  • Falcón García DK; Health Sciences, Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabasco, Villahermosa, MEX.
  • Nolasco Mendoza CL; Surgery, Hospital General Regional No. 220 "José Vicente Villada", Toluca, MEX.
  • Castillo JL; General Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, MEX.
  • Victoria Enriquez JA; General Surgery, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Toluca, MEX.
  • Flores Valdés JR; Research, Oncology Consultants PA, Houston, USA.
Cureus ; 16(7): e63772, 2024 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39100034
ABSTRACT
Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer and the leading cause of cancer death among women worldwide. Surgical treatments, including mastectomy and subsequent breast reconstruction, are critical components of breast cancer management. This systematic review compares the outcomes of flap versus implant reconstruction post-mastectomy, focusing on aesthetic differences, pain, recovery, and psychological adaptation. Adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, we conducted a comprehensive literature search across PubMed, Cochrane, and ScienceDirect databases. Inclusion criteria targeted studies comparing aesthetic outcomes, pain, recovery costs, duration, and psychological adaptation between flap and implant breast reconstructions. We excluded non-English and non-Spanish studies, case reports, and those without full-text availability. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). From an initial pool of 25,881 articles, 16 high-quality studies involving 14,196 participants were selected for synthesis. Flap reconstruction was associated with higher patient satisfaction regarding aesthetic outcomes and psychological well-being but also had higher complication rates, including infections and wound dehiscence. Implant reconstruction showed fewer complications but did not achieve the same level of patient satisfaction. Flap reconstruction, despite its higher complication rates, tends to provide superior aesthetic and psychological outcomes compared to implant reconstruction. These findings highlight the importance of personalized treatment plans considering individual patient needs and preferences. Future research should focus on long-term randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and standardized outcome measures to further delineate the comparative effectiveness of these reconstruction techniques. Personalized care and ongoing research are essential to improving the quality of life for breast cancer survivors undergoing reconstruction.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Cureus Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Cureus Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article