Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy of first-line combination therapies versus gemcitabine monotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Huang, Wen-Kuan; Hung, Yu-Liang; Tsai, Chun-Yi; Wu, Chiao-En; Chou, Wen-Chi; Hsu, Jun-Te; Yeh, Ta-Sen; Chen, Jen-Shi; Wang, Shang-Yu; Yeh, Chun-Nan.
Afiliação
  • Huang WK; Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou Taoyuan, Taiwan.
  • Hung YL; College of Medicine, Chang Gung University Taoyuan, Taiwan.
  • Tsai CY; College of Medicine, Chang Gung University Taoyuan, Taiwan.
  • Wu CE; Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Taoyuan, Taiwan.
  • Chou WC; College of Medicine, Chang Gung University Taoyuan, Taiwan.
  • Hsu JT; Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Taoyuan, Taiwan.
  • Yeh TS; Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou Taoyuan, Taiwan.
  • Chen JS; College of Medicine, Chang Gung University Taoyuan, Taiwan.
  • Wang SY; Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou Taoyuan, Taiwan.
  • Yeh CN; College of Medicine, Chang Gung University Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Am J Cancer Res ; 14(7): 3523-3532, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39113858
ABSTRACT
Various first-line gemcitabine-based or fluorouracil-based combination regimens were approved in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Recent randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have investigated chemotherapy backbones in combination with novel investigational drugs, including chemotherapy agents or targeted drugs. However, the comparative efficacy of these different combination therapies remains limited. This systematic review and network meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy of first-line combination therapies for advanced pancreatic cancer. The study included 46 RCTs with 10,499 patients and 47 distinct regimens, using data sources from MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Clinical Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov from January 1, 2010 to April 23, 2024. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), while secondary outcomes included overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). The analysis revealed that gemcitabine+nab-paclitaxel (GA), GA with platinum and fluorouracil (GA+Plat+FU), gemcitabine with fluorouracil (G+FU), G+Plt+FU, and FOLFIRINOX were associated with superior OS and PFS compared to gemcitabine monotherapy. Triplet or quadruplet polychemotherapy combinations, such as GA+Plat+FU, G+Plt+FU, and FOLFIRINOX, demonstrated better OS benefit with hazard ratios of 0.42 (95% CI, 0.26-0.68), 0.41 (95% CI, 0.24-0.71), and 0.58 (95% CI, 0.48-0.71), respectively, compared to doublet regimens like GA and G+FU, which had hazard ratios of 0.70 (95% CI, 0.59-0.82) and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.72-0.95), respectively. Notably, no targeted drugs, monoclonal antibodies, or other medications showed improved survival when added to chemotherapy backbones. These findings support the use of gemcitabine-based or fluorouracil-based triplet or quadruplet regimens for better survival outcomes in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Further research is warranted to explore the potential benefits of adding chemotherapy agents, such as fluorouracil, to the GA doublet regimen.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Am J Cancer Res Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Am J Cancer Res Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article