Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Integration of patient and public involvement in a doctoral research study using the research cycle.
Pearson, Helen; Bell, Carol; Cox, Karl; Kayum, Catherine; Knox, Leona; Gibson, Faith; Myall, Michelle; Darlington, Anne-Sophie; Potter, Emma; Bird, Nicholas.
Afiliação
  • Pearson H; School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK. Helenpearson1@nhs.net.
  • Bell C; The Oak Centre for Children and Young People, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey, UK. Helenpearson1@nhs.net.
  • Cox K; Member of the REDMAPP Patient Public Involvement Group, London, UK.
  • Kayum C; Member of the REDMAPP Patient Public Involvement Group, London, UK.
  • Knox L; Member of the REDMAPP Patient Public Involvement Group, London, UK.
  • Gibson F; Member of the REDMAPP Patient Public Involvement Group, London, UK.
  • Myall M; Solving Kids' Cancer UK, London, UK.
  • Darlington AS; Centre for Outcomes and Experience Research in Children's Health, Illness and Disability (ORCHID), Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Potter E; School of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, UK.
  • Bird N; School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Res Involv Engagem ; 10(1): 87, 2024 Aug 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39123249
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Patient and public involvement (PPI) in research is widely acknowledged as essential to achieving successful and impactful research. Despite this acknowledgement, there are limited reports on how to approach and apply meaningful PPI throughout the research cycle and how to address challenges for researchers such as doctoral students, particularly when undertaking research on sensitive topics. This paper provides insights and examples for researchers new to PPI, on the impact of active PPI and recommendations for building and developing a PPI group in a paediatric focused doctoral research study with bereaved parents and carers.

METHODS:

PPI was informed by the research cycle. The GRIPP2 short-form checklist was used to report PPI. The research was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research.

RESULTS:

PPI enhanced the research through input into the study design, recruitment, co-design of the study website and branding; and ethics amendments to increase participation in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The literature review was extended to incorporate a PPI consultation phase and members contributed to data analysis. A flexible approach enabled involvement to develop iteratively throughout the research study, resulting in changes being made to enhance the study design and outcomes.

CONCLUSION:

This paper contributes to the limited knowledge base on embedding PPI into a doctoral research study and within the paediatric setting specifically working in partnership with bereaved parents and carers. Employing an adaptive approach to meet individual PPI needs, building a trusting and respectful partnership, creating shared ownership and investment in the research, are essential components to successful PPI.
Involving patients and the public in research provides the opportunity to develop meaningful outcomes that are relevant to the population being studied. Despite the benefits of patient and public involvement in research, guidelines that support researchers in doing so, lack detail on how to do this effectively. This is particularly important for those new to research such as doctoral students, who have so much to learn in developing a research study. Different approaches and applications to involvement are also likely to be needed depending on the population being studied. There are limited published papers on examples of how doctoral students have engaged and involved patients and the public in the context of their studies, and specifically within the children's setting, working in partnership with bereaved parents and carers, or those with seriously ill children. This paper offers examples and insights for those new to research in how to involve patients and the public throughout the research cycle. Specifically undertaking research in a sensitive subject of a particular childhood cancer which has poor outcomes and how to incorporate and evaluate successful patient and public involvement in their research activities such as study design and analysis of the results. Parent and carer reflections on their experiences of being involved are also reported and researcher recommendations for approaching and working with a patient and public group are described.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Res Involv Engagem Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Res Involv Engagem Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article