Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Genital and Subjective Sexual Arousal in Androphilic Women and Gynephilic Men in Response to the Copulatory Movements of Different Animal Species.
Krejcová, Lucie; Vanícek, Ondrej; Hula, Martin; Potyszová, Katerina; Bártová, Klára.
Afiliação
  • Krejcová L; Department of Psychology and Life Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Charles University, Pátková 2137/5, 182 00, Prague, Czech Republic. lucie.krejcova@fhs.cuni.cz.
  • Vanícek O; Department of Psychology and Life Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Charles University, Pátková 2137/5, 182 00, Prague, Czech Republic.
  • Hula M; Department of Psychology and Life Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Charles University, Pátková 2137/5, 182 00, Prague, Czech Republic.
  • Potyszová K; Department of Psychology and Life Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Charles University, Pátková 2137/5, 182 00, Prague, Czech Republic.
  • Bártová K; Department of Psychology and Life Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Charles University, Pátková 2137/5, 182 00, Prague, Czech Republic.
Arch Sex Behav ; 2024 Aug 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39134732
ABSTRACT
Research has repeatedly shown marked differences in men's and women's sexual response patterns; genital response in men tends to be elicited by cues that correspond to their sexual preference (preferred gender), while women's genital response is less sensitive to gender cues and more sensitive to the presence and intensity of other sexual cues (e.g., sexual activities). We tested whether the cue of copulatory movement in a general sexual context elicited a genital response in androphilic women but not in gynephilic men. If so, women should react to stimuli depicting not only the non-preferred gender but also other animal species differing in phylogenetic distance to humans. We studied the genital and self-reported arousal of 30 gynephilic men and 28 androphilic women to two sexual videos depicting penetrative human sexual intercourse (female-male and female-female) and nine videos depicting animal copulation. Neither women nor men showed genital or subjective sexual arousal to non-human sexual stimuli. Moreover, both sexes demonstrated a highly cue-specific pattern of arousal. Our results suggest that copulatory movement displayed in non-human species is not a sexual cue that can elicit genital or subjective sexual arousal in humans.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Arch Sex Behav Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Arch Sex Behav Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article