Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Competence of allogenic demineralized tooth matrix in socket seal surgery for alveolar ridge preservation: a randomized control clinical trial.
Bureekanchan, Kannika; Leepong, Narit; Suttapreyasri, Srisurang.
Afiliação
  • Bureekanchan K; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, 90112, Thailand.
  • Leepong N; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, 90112, Thailand. Narit.l@psu.ac.th.
  • Suttapreyasri S; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, 90112, Thailand. srisurang.s@psu.ac.th.
Clin Oral Investig ; 28(9): 484, 2024 Aug 14.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39138740
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To assess and compare the clinical, radiological, and histological outcomes of socket seal surgery between two protocols deproteinized demineralized tooth matrix (dpDTM) and freeze-dried bone allograft (FDBA) each covered with a free gingival graft. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Twenty extraction sockets in the anterior or premolar region were randomly allocated to either the dpDTM or FDBA protocol (n = 10 per group). Measurements of the alveolar ridge changes were obtained using an intraoral scanner and cone-beam computed tomography at 3 months post-operation. Three-month post surgery, the dental implant was installed (n = 5 per group), bone biopsies were obtained for histomorphometrical and micro-computed tomography analyses. Implant stability quotients (ISQs) were determined and compared at 3 months post-implant.

RESULTS:

Lower significant reductions in buccal alveolar ridge height and hard tissue volume were observed in dpDTM group compared to FDBA group at 3 months (0.25 ± 0.35 mm vs. 1.60 ± 0.66 mm [p = .000] and 9.64 ± 15.39% mm3 vs. 31.45 ± 18.11% mm3 [p = .010], respectively). At the same time, lower soft tissue volume reduction was detected in the dpDTM group compared to FDBA group (4.21 ± 5.25% mm3 vs. 5.25 ± 5.79% mm3). No statistically significant difference in the percentage of mineralized tissue formation was found between dpDTM group (53.39 ± 11.16%) and FDBA group (49.90 ± 3.27%). Even though the ISQ in the dpDTM group showed a higher value than the FDBA group at 3 months post-implant, the results were without statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS:

Alveolar ridge preservation using dpDTM is an efficacious procedure for providing the conditions for the development of functional and esthetic implants.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Alvéolo Dental / Tomografia Computadorizada de Feixe Cônico Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Clin Oral Investig Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Alvéolo Dental / Tomografia Computadorizada de Feixe Cônico Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Clin Oral Investig Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article