Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Multivariable linear model for predicting graft weight based on 3-dimensional volumetry in regards to body weight change of living liver donor: an observational cohort study.
Han, Seungwook; Rhu, Jinsoo; Lim, Soyoung; Choi, Gyu-Seong; Kim, Jong Man; Joh, Jae-Won.
Afiliação
  • Han S; Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Rhu J; Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Lim S; Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Choi GS; Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Kim JM; Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Joh JW; Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Ann Surg Treat Res ; 107(2): 91-99, 2024 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39139829
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

The purpose of this study is to build a prediction model for estimating graft weight about different graft volumetry methods combined with other variables.

Methods:

Donors who underwent living-donor right hepatectomy from March 2021 to March 2023 were included. Estimated graft volume measured by conventional method and 3-dimensional (3D) software were collected as well as the actual graft weight. Linear regression was used to build a prediction model. Donor groups were divided according to the 3D volumetry of <700 cm3, 700-899 cm3, and ≥900 cm3 to compare the performance of different models.

Results:

A total of 119 donors were included. Conventional volumetry showed R2 of 0.656 (P < 0.001) while 3D software showed R2 of 0.776 (P < 0.001). The R2 of the multivariable model was 0.842 (P < 0.001) including for 3D volume (ß = 0.623, P < 0.001), body mass index (ß = 7.648, P < 0.001), and amount of weight loss (ß = -7.252, P < 0.001). The median errors between different models and actual graft weight did not differ in donor groups (<700 and 700-899 cm3), while the median error of univariable linear model using 3D software (122.5; interquartile range [IQR], 61.5-179.8) was significantly higher than multivariable-adjusted linear model (41.5; IQR, 24.8-69.8; P = 0.003) in donors with estimated graft weight ≥900 cm3.

Conclusion:

The univariable 3D volumetry model showed an acceptable outcome for donors with an estimated graft volume <900 cm3. For donors with an estimated graft volume ≥900 cm3, the multivariable-adjusted linear model showed higher accuracy.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Ann Surg Treat Res Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Ann Surg Treat Res Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article