Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
CutFEM-based MEG forward modeling improves source separability and sensitivity to quasi-radial sources: A somatosensory group study.
Erdbrügger, Tim; Höltershinken, Malte; Radecke, Jan-Ole; Buschermöhle, Yvonne; Wallois, Fabrice; Pursiainen, Sampsa; Gross, Joachim; Lencer, Rebekka; Engwer, Christian; Wolters, Carsten.
Afiliação
  • Erdbrügger T; Institute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
  • Höltershinken M; Institute for Analysis and Numerics, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
  • Radecke JO; Institute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
  • Buschermöhle Y; Institute for Analysis and Numerics, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
  • Wallois F; Deptartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
  • Pursiainen S; Center for Brain, Behaviour and Metabolism (CBBM), University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
  • Gross J; Institute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
  • Lencer R; Otto Creutzfeldt Center for Cognitive and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
  • Engwer C; Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, University of Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens, France.
  • Wolters C; Computing Sciences Unit, Faculty of Information Technology and Communication Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Hum Brain Mapp ; 45(11): e26810, 2024 Aug 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39140847
ABSTRACT
Source analysis of magnetoencephalography (MEG) data requires the computation of the magnetic fields induced by current sources in the brain. This so-called MEG forward problem includes an accurate estimation of the volume conduction effects in the human head. Here, we introduce the Cut finite element method (CutFEM) for the MEG forward problem. CutFEM's meshing process imposes fewer restrictions on tissue anatomy than tetrahedral meshes while being able to mesh curved geometries contrary to hexahedral meshing. To evaluate the new approach, we compare CutFEM with a boundary element method (BEM) that distinguishes three tissue compartments and a 6-compartment hexahedral FEM in an n = 19 group study of somatosensory evoked fields (SEF). The neural generators of the 20 ms post-stimulus SEF components (M20) are reconstructed using both an unregularized and a regularized inversion approach. Changing the forward model resulted in reconstruction differences of about 1 centimeter in location and considerable differences in orientation. The tested 6-compartment FEM approaches significantly increase the goodness of fit to the measured data compared with the 3-compartment BEM. They also demonstrate higher quasi-radial contributions for sources below the gyral crowns. Furthermore, CutFEM improves source separability compared with both other approaches. We conclude that head models with 6 compartments rather than 3 and the new CutFEM approach are valuable additions to MEG source reconstruction, in particular for sources that are predominantly radial.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Magnetoencefalografia / Análise de Elementos Finitos / Potenciais Somatossensoriais Evocados Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Hum Brain Mapp Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Magnetoencefalografia / Análise de Elementos Finitos / Potenciais Somatossensoriais Evocados Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Hum Brain Mapp Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article