Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Survey Research Among Neurosurgeons: A Bibliometric Review of the Characteristics, Quality, and Citation Predictors of the Top 50 Most-Influential Publications in the Neurosurgical Literature.
Jamjoom, Abdulhakim B; Gahtani, Abdulhadi Y; Jamjoom, Jude M; Sharab, Belal M; Jamjoom, Omar M; AlZahrani, Moajeb T.
Afiliação
  • Jamjoom AB; Section of Neurosurgery, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, SAU.
  • Gahtani AY; Section of Neurosurgery, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, SAU.
  • Jamjoom JM; Department of Medical Education, Alfaisal University College of Medicine, Riyadh, SAU.
  • Sharab BM; Department of Medical Education, Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara, TUR.
  • Jamjoom OM; Department of Pharmaceutical Care Services, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Western Region, Jeddah, SAU.
  • AlZahrani MT; Section of Neurosurgery, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences College of Medicine, Jeddah, SAU.
Cureus ; 16(7): e64785, 2024 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39156328
ABSTRACT
Survey research enables the gathering of information on individual perspectives in a large cohort. It can be epidemiological, attitude or knowledge focussed. Assessment of survey studies sampling neurosurgeons is currently lacking in the literature. This study aimed to highlight the characteristics, quality, and citation predictors of the most influential survey research studies published in the neurosurgical literature. Using PubMed and Google Scholar, the 50 most cited survey research publications were identified and reviewed. Data relating to the characteristics of the articles, participants and questionnaires were retrieved. The studies' quality and citation patterns were assessed. The median articles' age and publishing journal impact factor (IF) were 15.5 years and 2.82, respectively. Thirty-two (64%) articles were first authored by researchers from the USA while 28(56%) studies were focussed on specific disease management. The median number of participants and response rates were 222 and 51%, respectively. A full version of the questionnaire was provided in 18 (36%) articles. Only four (8%) articles reported validation of the questionnaire. The overall quality of reporting of the surveys was considered fair (based on good grading in five parameters, fair grading in one parameter, and poor grading in four parameters). The median citation number was 111. The citation analysis showed that the participant number, article age (≥15.5 years), and questionnaire category (surgical complications) were significant predictors of citation numbers. The citation rates were not influenced by the response rates or the journal's IF. In conclusion, high-impact survey publications in the neurosurgical literature were moderately cited and of fair quality. Their citation numbers were not affected by response rates but were positively influenced by the publication age, number of participants, and by novel data or the questions raised in the survey category. Surveys are valuable forms of research that require extensive planning, time, and effort in order to produce meaningful results. Increasing awareness of the factors that could affect citations may be useful to those who wish to undertake survey research.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Cureus Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Cureus Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article