Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Feasibility of Using Simulation to Evaluate Implementation Fidelity in an Advance Care Planning Pragmatic Trial.
Cotter, Valerie T; Sloan, Danetta H; Scerpella, Daniel L; Smith, Kelly M; Abshire Saylor, Martha; Wolff, Jennifer L.
Afiliação
  • Cotter VT; Johns Hopkins School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Sloan DH; Department of Health Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Scerpella DL; Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Smith KM; Institute of Health Policy, Management, & Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Abshire Saylor M; Johns Hopkins School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Wolff JL; Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Am J Hosp Palliat Care ; : 10499091241282087, 2024 Sep 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39226471
ABSTRACT
Background and

Objectives:

Traditional methods of fidelity monitoring are not possible in pragmatic trials in real-world clinical settings. We describe our approach to monitoring and reinforcing the fidelity to ACP conversations for a hard-to-reach subpopulation by using standardized patients in a pragmatic trial. Research Design and

Methods:

We developed standardized patient scenarios grounded in the Respecting Choices First Steps™ Advance Care Planning curriculum to provide an opportunity to reinforce and assess ACP facilitator competency. Scenarios represented one-on-one encounters. The first case was a standardized patient with cognitive impairment and the second case involved a standardized patient with dementia and their care partner. A previously validated fidelity checklist was used to score skills and behaviors observed during simulations including encounter set-up, ACP topics, and general communication. Simulations involved voice teleconferencing to align primary modality of ACP in the pragmatic trial.

Results:

Six facilitators completed two standardized patient cases each. Overall fidelity scores were moderately high (78.8% ± 11.7; 63.4 - 95.6) for the case with cognitive impairment and for the case with the patient with dementia and care partner (76.2% ± 13.0; 54.4 - 91.5). Discussion and Implications Simulation using standardized patients supported fidelity monitoring and provided coachable feedback to support facilitator competency. Our study can help inform future research and training related to advance care planning in older adults living with Alzheimer's disease and related disorders.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Am J Hosp Palliat Care Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Am J Hosp Palliat Care Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article