Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Health impact of rotavirus vaccination in China.
Oluwaseun, Sharomi; Yang, Chelsey; Si Tu, Su Jian; Yin, Jia; Song, Yan; Sun, Qiang; Kanibir, Nabi; Hartwig, Susanne; Carias, Cristina.
Afiliação
  • Oluwaseun S; BARDS-HEDS, Merck & Co. Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA.
  • Yang C; HEOR, Analysis Group, Beijing, China.
  • Si Tu SJ; HEOR, MSD China Holding Co. Ltd., China.
  • Yin J; Centre for Health Management and Policy Research, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
  • Song Y; NHC Key Lab of Health Economics and Policy Research, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
  • Sun Q; HEOR, Epidemiology & Market Access, Analysis Group, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Kanibir N; Centre for Health Management and Policy Research, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
  • Hartwig S; NHC Key Lab of Health Economics and Policy Research, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
  • Carias C; Global Medical and Scientific Affairs, MSD International GmBH, Luzern, Switzerland.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 20(1): 2386750, 2024 Dec 31.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39269780
ABSTRACT
Rotavirus (RV) vaccines have demonstrated substantial effectiveness in reducing the healthcare burden caused by gastroenteritis (RVGE) worldwide. This study aims to understand the differential impact of RV vaccination in reducing RVGE burden in children under 7 years old in China. A Markov Model was used to investigate the health impact of introducing two different RV vaccines into the Chinese population. The analysis was conducted for RV5, a live pentavalent human-bovine reassortant vaccine, and Lanzhou Lamb RV (LLR), a live-attenuated monovalent RV vaccine, separately, by comparing the strategy of each vaccine to no vaccination within a Chinese birth cohort, including 100,000 children modeled until 7 years of age. The vaccination scenario assumed a vaccination coverage of 2.5%, 2.5%, 90% and 5% for doses one, two, three and no vaccine, respectively, for both vaccines. Strategies with RV5, LLR, and no vaccination were associated with 9,895, 49,069, and 64,746 symptomatic RV infections, respectively. RV5 and LLR were associated with an 85% and 24% reduction in the total symptomatic RV infections, respectively, suggesting that the health benefits of RV5 are at least three-fold greater than those associated with the LLR. Further, strategies with RV5 and LLR resulted in an estimated 206 and 59-year increase in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), respectively. Sensitivity and scenario analyses supported the robustness of the base-case findings. Use of RV vaccine is expected to improve RV-associated health outcomes and its adoption will help alleviate the burden of RVGE in China. RV5 use will result in significantly better health outcomes.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções por Rotavirus / Vacinação / Vacinas contra Rotavirus / Gastroenterite Limite: Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male / Newborn País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Hum Vaccin Immunother Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções por Rotavirus / Vacinação / Vacinas contra Rotavirus / Gastroenterite Limite: Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male / Newborn País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Hum Vaccin Immunother Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article