Is an all-phase ITV (internal target volume) a gold standard in the target definition of hepatocellular carcinoma?

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic ablative body radiation (SABR) is a well-recognized treatment option for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Due to the inherent motion of liver tumors, effective motion management is crucial for successful SABR. In the motion-encompassing motion management technique, all 10 respiratory phase image datasets are delineated and designated as the internal target volume (ITV). Some treatment centers use single or combination image sets to delineate the target volume. This study determines which specialty image set most closely matches an all-phase ITV contour on a synchronized contrast-enhanced 4DCT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Synchronized 4DCT contrast and delayed scans were acquired for 10 patients in the study. The maximum intensity projection (MiP), average intensity projection (AvgIP), and minimum intensity projection (MinIP) images were generated. The ITV delineation was done in all 10 phases (ITV_all_phase). The ITV_2phase combines the peak inhale and exhale phase, ITV_2 M combines MiP and MinIP, and ITV_3 M combines MiP, MinIP, and AvgIP. All ITVs were compared to ITV_all_phase with Dice similarity index (DSI) and volumes. RESULTS: Using ITV_all_phase as the reference, the DSI and the mean ITV volumes for the different ITVs were as follows ITV_all_phase (1 and 116.69 cc), ITV_2phase (0.87 and 105.27 cc), MiP (0.76 and 98.24 cc), AvgIP (0.72 and 94.54 cc), ITV_MinIP (0.67 and 81.08 cc), ITV_2 M (0.84 and 106.26 cc), and ITV_3 M (0.86 and 112.51 cc). CONCLUSION: The study demonstrates that in the motion-encompassing technique of motion management, the target volume generated by delineating all phases of 4DCT provides the most accurate representation for patients with HCC. Specialty image sets and their combinations, while sometimes close, tend to result in less accurate targeting. Hence, the all-phase 4DCT method should be preferred to avoid geographical misses and ensure optimal treatment outcomes. However, our conclusion may be limited by the technique we employed.