Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Does portal vein anatomy influence intrahepatic distribution of metastases from colorectal cancer?
Tribolet, Anaïs; Barat, Maxime; Fuks, David; Aissaoui, Mathilde; Soyer, Philippe; Marchese, Ugo; Gaillard, Martin; Nassar, Alexandra; Hardwigsen, Jean; Tzedakis, Stylianos.
Afiliação
  • Tribolet A; Department of Digestive Surgery and Liver Transplantation, La Timone Hospital, AP-HM, University Aix-Marseille, Marseille, France.
  • Barat M; Department of Hepatobiliary, Digestive and Endocrine Surgery, Cochin Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France.
  • Fuks D; Université Paris Cité, Faculté de Médecine, Paris, France.
  • Aissaoui M; Department of Radiology, Cochin Hospital, Paris, France.
  • Soyer P; Department of Hepatobiliary, Digestive and Endocrine Surgery, Cochin Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France.
  • Marchese U; Université Paris Cité, Faculté de Médecine, Paris, France.
  • Gaillard M; Université Paris Cité, Faculté de Médecine, Paris, France.
  • Nassar A; Department of Radiology, Cochin Hospital, Paris, France.
  • Hardwigsen J; Université Paris Cité, Faculté de Médecine, Paris, France.
  • Tzedakis S; Department of Radiology, Cochin Hospital, Paris, France.
Radiol Oncol ; 58(3): 376-385, 2024 Sep 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39287169
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Other than location of the primary colorectal cancer (CRC), a few factors are known to influence the intrahepatic distribution of colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM). We aimed to assess whether the anatomy of the portal vein (PV) could influence the intrahepatic distribution of CRLM. PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

Patients with CRLM diagnosed between January 2018 and December 2022 at two tertiary centers were included and imaging was reviewed by two radiologists independently. Intra-operator concordance was assessed according to the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The influence of the diameter, angulation of the PV branches and their variations on the number and distribution of CRLM were compared using Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis, Pearson's Chi-square and Spearman's correlation tests.

RESULTS:

Two hundred patients were included. ICC was high (> 0.90, P < 0.001). Intrahepatic CRLM distribution was right-liver, left-liver unilateral and bilateral in 66 (33%), 24 (12%) and 110 patients (55%), respectively. Median number of CRLM was 3 (1-7). Type 1, 2 and 3 portal vein variations were observed in 156 (78%), 19 (9.5%) and 25 (12%) patients, respectively. CRLM unilateral or bilateral distribution was not influenced by PV anatomical variations (P = 0.13), diameter of the right (P = 0.90) or left (P = 0.50) PV branches, angulation of the right (P = 0.20) or left (P = 0.80) PV branches and was independent from primary tumor localisation (P = 0.60). No correlations were found between CRLM number and diameter (R 0.093, P = 0.10) or angulation of the PV branches (R 0.012, P = 0.83).

CONCLUSIONS:

PV anatomy does not seem to influence the distribution and number of CRLM.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Veia Porta / Neoplasias Colorretais / Neoplasias Hepáticas Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Radiol Oncol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Veia Porta / Neoplasias Colorretais / Neoplasias Hepáticas Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Radiol Oncol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article