Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Kidney re-transplantation in the ipsilateral iliac fossa: a surgeon's perspective on perioperative outcome.
Tessmer, Philipp; Weigle, Clara A; Meyer, Anna; Wiemann, Bengt A; Gwinner, Wilfried; Einecke, Gunilla; Klempnauer, Jürgen; Vondran, Florian W R; Richter, Nicolas; Oldhafer, Felix; Beetz, Oliver.
Afiliação
  • Tessmer P; Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
  • Weigle CA; Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
  • Meyer A; Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
  • Wiemann BA; Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
  • Gwinner W; Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
  • Einecke G; Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
  • Klempnauer J; Department of Nephrology and Endocrinology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
  • Vondran FWR; Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
  • Richter N; Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
  • Oldhafer F; Department of General, Visceral, Pediatric and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
  • Beetz O; Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Clin Kidney J ; 17(9): sfae271, 2024 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39323730
ABSTRACT

Background:

Compared with primary transplantation, ipsilateral renal re-transplantation is associated with an increased risk of surgical complications and inferior graft outcomes. This study investigates whether an ipsilateral re-transplantation approach per se is an independent risk factor for surgical complications and early graft loss.

Methods:

In this retrospective, single-centre analysis, surgical complications and early graft outcomes of ipsilateral kidney re-transplantations from January 2007 to December 2017 were compared with primary transplantations and contralateral re-transplantations. Univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors for surgical complications requiring surgical revision and graft loss within the first year after transplantation.

Results:

Of the 1489 kidney transplantations, 51 were ipsilateral, 159 were contralateral re-transplantations and 1279 were primary transplantations. Baseline characteristics did not differ between the ipsilateral and contralateral re-transplant recipients except for current and highest panel reactive antibody levels. Major complications requiring surgical revision were significantly more frequent in ipsilateral re-transplantations (P = .010) than in primary transplantations but did not differ between ipsilateral and contralateral re-transplantations (P = .217). Graft loss within the first year after transplant was 15.7% in the ipsilateral versus 8.8% in the contralateral re-transplant group (P = .163) versus 6.4% in the primary transplantation group (P = .009). In a multivariate regression model, ipsilateral re-transplantation was not identified as an independent risk factor for complications requiring surgical revision or first-year graft loss.

Conclusions:

Ipsilateral renal re-transplantation is not a risk factor for inferior outcomes. Graft implantation into a pre-transplanted iliac fossa is a feasible and valid therapeutic option.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Clin Kidney J Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Clin Kidney J Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article