Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Transurethral microwave treatment for benign prostatic hypertrophy: a randomised controlled clinical trial.
Bdesha, A S; Bunce, C J; Kelleher, J P; Snell, M E; Vukusic, J; Witherow, R O.
Afiliação
  • Bdesha AS; Department of Urology, St Mary's Hospital, London.
BMJ ; 306(6888): 1293-6, 1993 May 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7686065
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To determine whether transurethral microwave treatment for patients with benign prostatic hypertrophy provides significant symptomatic relief, a reduction in residual urine volumes, and improvements in flow rates compared with sham treatment.

DESIGN:

Prospective double blind randomised study with follow up at three months.

SETTING:

Department of Urology in a London teaching hospital. PATIENTS 40 men completed the study 22 received microwave treatment and 18 received sham treatment. Entry criteria were symptoms of prostatism of at least six months' duration, a total symptom score > 14, and a peak urine flow rate < 15 ml/s or a residual urine volume > 50 ml. Exclusion criteria were prostatic cancer, a residual urine volume > 200 ml, a very large prostate, an obstructing middle lobe, acute urinary retention, impaired renal function, coexisting urinary tract disease, and previous prostatic surgery.

INTERVENTIONS:

A single 90 minute transurethral microwave treatment or sham treatment. OUTCOME

MEASURES:

Patients' symptoms (including daytime frequency and nocturia) recorded in a self assessment symptom score questionnaire, peak urinary flow rates, and residual urine volumes.

RESULTS:

The mean total symptom scores of the patients who received microwave treatment fell from 30 to 11 compared with a fall from 31 to 26 for patients who received sham treatment (p < 0.001). Among patients who received microwave treatment daytime frequency fell from 9.4 to 5.5 voids a day and night time frequency from 3.5 to 1.6 voids a night; residual urine volumes fell from 104 ml to 52 ml; and peak urine flow rates increased by 2.3 ml/s. In the control group there was no improvement in any of these features. Treatment preserved sexual function and antegrade ejaculation.

CONCLUSIONS:

For selected patients with prostatism microwave treatment is effective and has few side effects.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Hiperplasia Prostática / Micro-Ondas Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Ano de publicação: 1993 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Hiperplasia Prostática / Micro-Ondas Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Ano de publicação: 1993 Tipo de documento: Article