Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Rev. bras. ciênc. avic ; 18(1): 23-28, jan.-mar. 2016. tab
Artigo em Inglês | VETINDEX | ID: biblio-1490225

Resumo

In 2006, the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) published two standard protocols for the detection and enumeration of Campylobacter spp. in foods: the ISO 10272-2(direct method) and the ISO 10272-1 (enrichment method). The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency of these two methods in the detection of Campylobacter spp. and propose a modification in the enrichment method. Compared with the enrichment method, the direct method yielded a higher number of positive results for Campylobacter spp. and, consequently, presented higher sensitivity percentage. The isolation of Campylobacter spp. was more difficult when 10 mL of rinse was used in the enrichment method, which is currently recommended by the ISO protocol. Therefore, different rinse volumes were tested (2.5 and 5 mL). The most efficient recovery of Campylobacter spp. occurred when 2.5 mL of rinse were used in the enrichment method, most likely due to a lower number of microbial contaminants than that present in the 5 or 10 mL rinses. The proposed modification of the enrichment method will contribute to the food analysis by improving the detection of Campylobacter spp. in chicken carcass.


Assuntos
Animais , Alimentos Fortificados , Alimentos Fortificados/análise , Galinhas , Campylobacter/classificação , Campylobacter/química
2.
R. bras. Ci. avíc. ; 18(1): 23-28, jan.-mar. 2016. tab
Artigo em Inglês | VETINDEX | ID: vti-341400

Resumo

In 2006, the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) published two standard protocols for the detection and enumeration of Campylobacter spp. in foods: the ISO 10272-2(direct method) and the ISO 10272-1 (enrichment method). The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency of these two methods in the detection of Campylobacter spp. and propose a modification in the enrichment method. Compared with the enrichment method, the direct method yielded a higher number of positive results for Campylobacter spp. and, consequently, presented higher sensitivity percentage. The isolation of Campylobacter spp. was more difficult when 10 mL of rinse was used in the enrichment method, which is currently recommended by the ISO protocol. Therefore, different rinse volumes were tested (2.5 and 5 mL). The most efficient recovery of Campylobacter spp. occurred when 2.5 mL of rinse were used in the enrichment method, most likely due to a lower number of microbial contaminants than that present in the 5 or 10 mL rinses. The proposed modification of the enrichment method will contribute to the food analysis by improving the detection of Campylobacter spp. in chicken carcass.(AU)


Assuntos
Animais , Galinhas , Alimentos Fortificados/análise , Alimentos Fortificados , Campylobacter/química , Campylobacter/classificação
3.
Braz. J. Microbiol. ; 45(4): 1551-1554, Oct.-Dec. 2014. tab
Artigo em Inglês | VETINDEX | ID: vti-27131

Resumo

The aim of this study was the detection of Campylobacter sp. in raw chicken sausages using the methods ISO 10272-1 and ISO 10272-2. The overall prevalence of Campylobacter sp. in the samples tested was 16.67%, representing a serious risk to the health of consumers, particularly if measures guaranteeing proper cooking of foods and prevention of cross-contamination are not adopted. Furthermore, the majority of campylobacteriosis cases in humans are caused by consumption or improper handling of contaminated raw or undercooked poultry meat, which constitute the main vehicle of this infection.


Assuntos
Humanos , Animais , Campylobacter/isolamento & purificação , Produtos da Carne/microbiologia , Brasil/epidemiologia , Galinhas , Doenças Transmitidas por Alimentos/epidemiologia , Técnicas Microbiológicas/métodos , Prevalência , Medição de Risco
4.
Braz. J. Microbiol. ; 44(3): 791-794, July-Sept. 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | VETINDEX | ID: vti-304335

Resumo

This study was carried out comparing the conventional methods (ISO 11290-1 and BAM method, 2008) and system mini-Vidas® (Biomerieux), for detection of Listeria sp. and Salmonella sp. in cooled sausage. The immunoenzymatic method has shown to be effective for the detection of target pathogens, it has presented itself as an excellent screening method.(AU)


Assuntos
Listeria , Técnica de Imunoensaio Enzimático de Multiplicação , Salmonella , Benchmarking
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA