Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Acta sci. vet. (Impr.) ; 48(suppl.1): Pub.519-4 jan. 2020. ilus
Artigo em Inglês | VETINDEX | ID: biblio-1458346

Resumo

Background: Intestinal obstruction by a foreign body is a common occurrence in domestic animals, needing the attention of veterinarians and owners, given that a serious complication of this condition is intestinal rupture, with consequentperitonitis. Perforating objects are the ones most often associated with rupture, but any object that obstructs the intestinaltract, if not removed properly, can lead to intestinal rupture, generating a poor prognosis. This article reports a case ofintestinal rupture caused by a non-perforating foreign body in a dog.Case: A 1-year-old Chow-Chow dog was taken by its owner to the Portal Pet private clinic, with a history of foreignbody ingestion and emesis. The owner reported that he took the animal to veterinary care in another establishment on theday he noticed vomiting, with no other abnormality being detected. An injectable medication was administered, but theowner did not know what it was, and the dog was discharged. After 15 days, the owner sought care at the clinic initiallymentioned, due to the persistence of emesis, in addition to the onset of diarrhea and apparent apathy. On physical examination, the dog was apathetic, with pale mucosa and pain on abdominal palpation. A firm structure was felt, located in theepigastric region, compatible with a foreign body. The dog was referred for hospitalization and an abdominal ultrasoundwas requested, in addition to blood samples for hematological and serum biochemical tests (urea, creatinine, alanineaminotransferase, and alkaline phosphatase). Serology for parvovirus was also performed. The blood count revealedleukopenia (4,800 thousand/mm3) and biochemical analysis showed an increase in alkaline phosphatase (895.5 U/l). Theresults for parvovirus were negative. Ultrasonography confirmed the presence of a foreign body. The animal was referred...


Assuntos
Animais , Cães , Corpos Estranhos/diagnóstico por imagem , Corpos Estranhos/veterinária , Perfuração Intestinal/diagnóstico por imagem , Perfuração Intestinal/veterinária , Peritônio/patologia , Laparotomia/veterinária , Sepse/veterinária
2.
Acta sci. vet. (Online) ; 48(suppl.1): Pub. 519, July 10, 2020. ilus
Artigo em Inglês | VETINDEX | ID: vti-33239

Resumo

Background: Intestinal obstruction by a foreign body is a common occurrence in domestic animals, needing the attention of veterinarians and owners, given that a serious complication of this condition is intestinal rupture, with consequentperitonitis. Perforating objects are the ones most often associated with rupture, but any object that obstructs the intestinaltract, if not removed properly, can lead to intestinal rupture, generating a poor prognosis. This article reports a case ofintestinal rupture caused by a non-perforating foreign body in a dog.Case: A 1-year-old Chow-Chow dog was taken by its owner to the Portal Pet private clinic, with a history of foreignbody ingestion and emesis. The owner reported that he took the animal to veterinary care in another establishment on theday he noticed vomiting, with no other abnormality being detected. An injectable medication was administered, but theowner did not know what it was, and the dog was discharged. After 15 days, the owner sought care at the clinic initiallymentioned, due to the persistence of emesis, in addition to the onset of diarrhea and apparent apathy. On physical examination, the dog was apathetic, with pale mucosa and pain on abdominal palpation. A firm structure was felt, located in theepigastric region, compatible with a foreign body. The dog was referred for hospitalization and an abdominal ultrasoundwas requested, in addition to blood samples for hematological and serum biochemical tests (urea, creatinine, alanineaminotransferase, and alkaline phosphatase). Serology for parvovirus was also performed. The blood count revealedleukopenia (4,800 thousand/mm3) and biochemical analysis showed an increase in alkaline phosphatase (895.5 U/l). Theresults for parvovirus were negative. Ultrasonography confirmed the presence of a foreign body. The animal was referred...(AU)


Assuntos
Animais , Cães , Perfuração Intestinal/diagnóstico por imagem , Perfuração Intestinal/veterinária , Corpos Estranhos/diagnóstico por imagem , Corpos Estranhos/veterinária , Peritônio/patologia , Laparotomia/veterinária , Sepse/veterinária
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA