General anesthesia in geriatric dogs with propofol-isoflurane, propofolsevoflurane, alphaxalone-isoflurane, alphaxalone-sevoflurane and their comparison of biochemical, hemodynamic and cardiopulmonary effects

Background: Geriatric is defined as the life-cycle in which the physical state, organ functions, sensory functions, mental function and immunity progressively regress. Aging causes progressive and irreversible changes in the functional capacities of organ systems, which in turn alter the response to stress and anesthetic drugs. Propofol is an anesthetic agent with sedative and hypnotic effects. Anesthesia induction with propofol is fast and smooth. Alphaxalone (3α-hydroxy-5α-pregnane11,20-dione) is a central nervous system depressant in the form of synthetic neuroactive steroids. This allows anesthesia and muscle relaxation by increasing the inhibition of gamma amino butyric acid type A (GABA) receptors. The aim of this study is to compare effects of propofol-isoflurane and propofol-sevoflurane with relatively a new anesthetic combination alphaxalone-isoflurane and alphaxalone-sevoflurane on hematological, biochemical and physiological parameters.Materials, Methods & Results: Dogs were randomly divided into 4 groups and anesthesia protocols were applied. After induction of anesthesia with 6 mg/kg propofol in groups 1 and 2, isoflurane anesthesia was continued in group 1 and sevoflurane in group 2. After induction of 3 mg/kg alphaxalone anesthesia in groups 3 and 4, isoflurane anesthesia was continued in group 3 whereas sevoflurane in group 4. Vena cephalica was catheterized for blood collection. At the preanesthetic period, 15, 30, 45, 60 min and 60 min after the anesthesia, complete blood counts were performed. Serum ALT, AST, urea, creatinine values were measured during preanesthesia, perianesthesia 15-30 min and 60 min after anesthesia. Cardiopulmonary parameters and reflexes were evaluated before anesthesia and recorded at perianesthetic 5, 10, 15, 30, 45, 60 min and 60 min after full recovery. Patients were monitored during anesthesia. The average age of the dogs in the study was 10.83.[...]

General anesthesia in geriatric dogs with propofol-isoflurane, propofolsevoflurane, alphaxalone-isoflurane, alphaxalone-sevoflurane and their comparison of biochemical, hemodynamic and cardiopulmonary effects

Background: Geriatric is defined as the life-cycle in which the physical state, organ functions, sensory functions, mental function and immunity progressively regress. Aging causes progressive and irreversible changes in the functional capacities of organ systems, which in turn alter the response to stress and anesthetic drugs. Propofol is an anesthetic agent with sedative and hypnotic effects. Anesthesia induction with propofol is fast and smooth. Alphaxalone (3α-hydroxy-5α-pregnane11,20-dione) is a central nervous system depressant in the form of synthetic neuroactive steroids. This allows anesthesia and muscle relaxation by increasing the inhibition of gamma amino butyric acid type A (GABA) receptors. The aim of this study is to compare effects of propofol-isoflurane and propofol-sevoflurane with relatively a new anesthetic combination alphaxalone-isoflurane and alphaxalone-sevoflurane on hematological, biochemical and physiological parameters.Materials, Methods & Results: Dogs were randomly divided into 4 groups and anesthesia protocols were applied. After induction of anesthesia with 6 mg/kg propofol in groups 1 and 2, isoflurane anesthesia was continued in group 1 and sevoflurane in group 2. After induction of 3 mg/kg alphaxalone anesthesia in groups 3 and 4, isoflurane anesthesia was continued in group 3 whereas sevoflurane in group 4. Vena cephalica was catheterized for blood collection. At the preanesthetic period, 15, 30, 45, 60 min and 60 min after the anesthesia, complete blood counts were performed. Serum ALT, AST, urea, creatinine values were measured during preanesthesia, perianesthesia 15-30 min and 60 min after anesthesia. Cardiopulmonary parameters and reflexes were evaluated before anesthesia and recorded at perianesthetic 5, 10, 15, 30, 45, 60 min and 60 min after full recovery. Patients were monitored during anesthesia. The average age of the dogs in the study was 10.83.[...](AU)

Utilização de alfaxalona associado com meperidina e midazolam em gato obstruído / Use of alphaxalone associated with meperidine and midazolam in an obstructed cat

Objetivou-se com esse trabalho avaliar o uso do anestésico alfaxalona associado à meperidina e midazolam para o procedimento de desobstrução uretral em um gato com doença do trato urinário inferior felino (DTUIF), analisando as qualidades de indução e recuperação, assim como as alterações fisiológicas. Um felino macho, quatro anos de idade, 3.1 Kg, castrado, foi atendido no setor de emergência do Hospital Veterinário da Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-árido com histórico de estrangúria, abdome distendido e vesícula urinária repleta, sendo diagnosticado com DTUIF obstrutiva. Para o procedimento de desobstrução uretral a MPA foi instituída com meperidina 3mg/Kg por via intramuscular (IM), dez minutos após, procedeu-se a indução anestésica: 0,4mg/Kg de midazolam seguido de 2mg/Kg de alfaxalona, ambos diluídos em água de injeção, dispostos separadamente em seringas individuais, e administrados pela via intravenosa (IV). A alfaxalona foi administrado lentamente, contabilizando 1 minuto para total fornecimento. Foram avaliadas a frequência cardíaca (FC), frequência respiratória (f), temperatura retal (TR), pressão arterial sistólica (PAS), média (PAM), diastólica (PAD) e hemogasometria venosa, antes, durante e após o procedimento anestésico. A alfaxalona em associação com o midazolam produziu perda rápida da consciência, do reflexo de deglutição e intenso relaxamento muscular, bem como boa qualidade de indução e recuperação. O protocolo utilizado produziu mínimas anormalidades clinico patológicas, sem alterações importantes nos parâmetros cardíacos e respiratórios durante todo o procedimento, com manutenção da pressão arterial. Portanto, o anestésico alfaxalona foi considerado seguro para o procedimento de desobstrução uretral emgato macho com DTUIF.(AU)

The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of the anesthetic alfaxalone in combination with meperidine and midazolam as an anesthetic protocol for managing urethral obstruction in a male cat with feline lower urinary tract disease (FLUTD), and verify the quality of the induction and recovery as well as the physiological changes. A male four-year-old cat, weighing 3.1 kg, was admitted to the emergency service of the Veterinary Hospital at the Federal Rural Semi-Arid University, with a clinical history of stranguria, haematuria, distended abdomen and an enlarged urinary bladder. To prepare to unblock the urethral obstruction, intravenous (IV) Lactated Ringers solution (RL) administration was initially performed. The anesthetic protocol used was 3mg.kg-1 meperidine IM, followed by 0.4 mg.kg-1 midazolam IV given immediately before 2 mg.kg-1 alfaxalone IV. Heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), rectal temperature (RT), systolic arterial pressure (SAP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), diastolic arterial pressure (DAP) and venous blood gases were evaluated before, during and after the anesthesia. There was no significant variation in the analyzed parameters after administration of meperidine. Alfaxalone, in combination with midazolam, produced rapid loss of consciousness, swallowing reflex and intense muscle relaxation, as well as a good quality of induction and recovery. The presented protocol induced minimal clinical pathological abnormalities, no significant changes in cardiac and respiratory parameters throughout the procedure, with maintenance of the blood pressure. Therefore, the anesthetic alfaxalone was considered safe for managing urethral obstruction in male cat with FLUTD.(AU)