Cryopreservation of jaguar (Panthera onca) sperm cells using different cryoprotectants and different thawing temperatures
Jorge-Neto, Pedro Nacib; Luczinski, Thiago Cavalheri; Araújo, Gediendson Ribeiro de; Requena, Letícia Alecho; Jesus, Rogério Silva de; Souza, Larissa Schneider Brandão; Zanella, Ricardo; Costa e Silva, Eliane Vianna da; Deco-Souza, Thyara de; Pizzutto, Cristiane Schilbach.
Anim. Reprod. (Online);
20(1): e20230009, 2023. tab, ilus
Artigo
em Inglês
| VETINDEX
| ID: biblio-1425267
Resumo
The cryopreservation of jaguar semen must be improved to produce high-quality biobanking doses. Until now, the rare studies of semen freezing in the species have only evaluated glycerol, always with a significant reduction in sperm quality in thawed semen. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of three cryoprotectants, dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), glycerol (GLY), and methanol (MET), in the cryopreservation of jaguar semen in an LDL-based extender, as well as the effect of thawing temperature on dosage quality. Five mature males with a history of reproduction were used. On the males, an infrared thermal image (IRT) was captured, the spicules and testes were analyzed, and the CASA system was used to evaluate the quality of fresh and thawed sperm. The superficial IRT was 4.6 ± 1.2 °C cooler than the anal sphincter, and the semen measured between 27.3 and 28.7 °C shortly after exiting the urethra. The total motility of fresh sperm was 55.3 ± 22.6%, and progressive motility was 36.3 ± 18%. The total motility of thawed sperm was 5.28 ± 2.51%, 4.49 ± %2.49, and 0.51 ± 0.62% for DMSO, GLY, and MET, respectively. DMSO and GLY performed better than MET, and there was no difference in thawing temperature (37°C 30 s vs. 50°C 12 s). All animals exhibit a considerable level of morphological changes in sperm. Low amounts of total and progressive motility were found in the thawed sperm. Males with a high level of sperm morphological changes were found to be fertile, but the lone male with normospermia was infertile. Thus, we contest the applicability of the commonly used morphological classification for bovines to felid species.(AU)
Biblioteca responsável:
BR68.1
Texto completo