Comparative clinical evaluation of breast augmentation using silicone foam coated implants and textured implants
Calaes, Ivana Leme de; Motta, Marcos Matias; Basso, Rafael de Campos; Calderoni, Davi Reis; Kharmandayan, Paulo.
Acta cir. bras.;
35(4): e202000407, June 5, 2020. ilus, tab, graf
Artigo
em Inglês
| VETINDEX
| ID: vti-28653
Resumo
Purpose To evaluate whether silicone foam implants have a different evolution pattern compared to conventional texture implants. Methods Fifty-eight female patients underwent surgery. They were divided into two groups (silicone foam Lifesil® and microtexturized silicone Lifesil®). The evolution was analyzed in postoperative consultations, with physical examination, photographic documentation and filling in a satisfaction questionnaire, in the postoperative period of one month, four months, one year and then annually, up to a maximum of 3 years of follow-up. Results There were no statistically significant differences in presence of rippling, stretch marks, breast ptosis, capsular contracture and quality of scars. There was a higher rate of patients who were very satisfied with the outcome 360 days after surgery in the group receiving silicone foam implants (p = 0.036). Conclusion In short time, silicone foam envelope implants proved to be as reliable as textured silicone envelope implants, making them an option for augmentation mammoplasty.(AU)
Biblioteca responsável:
BR68.1
Localização: BR68.1
Texto completo