Your browser doesn't support javascript.

Portal de Pesquisa da BVS Veterinária

Informação e Conhecimento para a Saúde

Home > Pesquisa > ()
Imprimir Exportar

Formato de exportação:

Exportar

Exportar:

Email
Adicionar mais destinatários

Enviar resultado
| |

CLASSIFICAÇÃO DE ESCHERICHIA COLI PATOGÊNICA AVIÁRIA (APEC) E DE ESCHERICHIA COLI UROPATOGÊNICA (UPEC) EM GRUPOS FILOGENÉTICOS ASSOCIADOS COM A PATOGENICIDADE

SILVIO LUIS DA SILVEIRA ROCHA.
Tese em Português | VETTESES | ID: vtt-206426

Resumo

Escherichia coli is responsible for significant economic losses, including those occurring in poultry production. The control and prevention of avian colibacillosis are complex because it involves the distinction of pathogenic strains and those that are commonly found in the gastrointestinal tract flora of health birds. Although it has been assumed that most strains do not have zoonotic potential, recent studies have suggested that strains isolated from humans and poultry could share the genetic machinery needed to cause the disease in the host. Therefore, production animals could act as reservoirs of strains potentially pathogenic to humans. The aim of this study was to carry out the molecular characterization in phylogenetic groups of strains of E. coli isolated from poultry (APEC) and humans (UPEC), and to propose a future monitoring of the pathogenicity of APEC strains in poultry farms. A total of 450 UPEC and 460 APEC strains were selected for classification into four phylogenetic groups (A, B1, B2 and D) using a multiplex-PCR protocol. These results were compared with the presence or absence of 38 virulence-associated genes and the in vivo pathogenicity index established for each strain in a previous study. Regarding the APEC strains, 31.1% were classified in group D, 25.2% in group B2, 24.1% in group B1 and 19.6% in group A. Among the UPEC strains, 53.6% were classified in group B2, 25.3% in group D, 15.1% in group A and only 6.0% in group B1. Virulent strains are generally classified in group B2, but some may be classified in group D. While commensal isolates generally belong to groups A or B1. It was observed an association between certain genes and phylogenetic groups, both for APEC and UPEC strains. A significant difference was observed among pathogenicity indices according to the source of isolation, and the strains isolated from lesions presented the highest indices. A direct association between pathogenicity indices obtained in vivo and phylogenetic groups was also observed. Strains of groups B2 and D showed higher indices compared to strains from B1 and A. Since the distribution of APEC strains in phylogenetic groups showed a significant association with pathogenicity, multiplex-PCR becomes an important tool available for screening pathogenicity of the isolated samples in the poultry chain.
Escherichia coli is responsible for significant economic losses, including those occurring in poultry production. The control and prevention of avian colibacillosis are complex because it involves the distinction of pathogenic strains and those that are commonly found in the gastrointestinal tract flora of health birds. Although it has been assumed that most strains do not have zoonotic potential, recent studies have suggested that strains isolated from humans and poultry could share the genetic machinery needed to cause the disease in the host. Therefore, production animals could act as reservoirs of strains potentially pathogenic to humans. The aim of this study was to carry out the molecular characterization in phylogenetic groups of strains of E. coli isolated from poultry (APEC) and humans (UPEC), and to propose a future monitoring of the pathogenicity of APEC strains in poultry farms. A total of 450 UPEC and 460 APEC strains were selected for classification into four phylogenetic groups (A, B1, B2 and D) using a multiplex-PCR protocol. These results were compared with the presence or absence of 38 virulence-associated genes and the in vivo pathogenicity index established for each strain in a previous study. Regarding the APEC strains, 31.1% were classified in group D, 25.2% in group B2, 24.1% in group B1 and 19.6% in group A. Among the UPEC strains, 53.6% were classified in group B2, 25.3% in group D, 15.1% in group A and only 6.0% in group B1. Virulent strains are generally classified in group B2, but some may be classified in group D. While commensal isolates generally belong to groups A or B1. It was observed an association between certain genes and phylogenetic groups, both for APEC and UPEC strains. A significant difference was observed among pathogenicity indices according to the source of isolation, and the strains isolated from lesions presented the highest indices. A direct association between pathogenicity indices obtained in vivo and phylogenetic groups was also observed. Strains of groups B2 and D showed higher indices compared to strains from B1 and A. Since the distribution of APEC strains in phylogenetic groups showed a significant association with pathogenicity, multiplex-PCR becomes an important tool available for screening pathogenicity of the isolated samples in the poultry chain.
Biblioteca responsável: BR68.1