RESUMO
Introduction: Telemedicine is rapidly expanding across various fields worldwide. While it finds application in respiratory diseases due to the imperative need for protection against the risk of transmission and the close monitoring of patients with chronic diseases, there is a scarcity of publications detailing telemedicine experiences in respiratory diseases. This study aims to retrospectively evaluate the prospective management of patients with respiratory diseases through videoconference-based telemedicine, intending to establish a foundation for its judicious application in pulmonology cases. Materials and Methods: In this descriptive study, anonymized medical records of all 478 patients assessed via videoconference-based telemedicine over an eight-month period from June 2020 to February 2021 were reviewed. The analysis included demographic characteristics, disease history, attendance methods, the necessity for in-person physical examination after the initial videoconference (VC) session, the inclusion of investigations, pre-diagnosis, diagnosis processes, follow-up period, and outcomes. Follow-up data for all patients included in the study were reviewed at the end of June 2021. Result: Median age of the patients was 55 (44-67), with a male predominance of 55%. Approximately 30% resided in a city other than the one in which the physician offering telemedicine was situated. Seventy-nine (16.7%) individuals received telemedicine via VC sessions without the requirement for any in-person examinations. The most prevalent disease among those who applied for telemedicine was asthma. Median duration of the initial VC session was 13 (8-18) minutes. At least half of the individuals seeking videoconference-based telemedicine for chronic respiratory disorders, such as asthma, COPD, and interstitial lung disease, had previously been followed by either the telemedicine provider or another physician in the same hospital. However, the vast majority of telemedicine applications in disease categories such as COVID, post-COVID, pulmonary nodules, and lung cancer were submitted by first-time applicants. Conclusions: This pioneering study suggests that videoconference-based telemedicine may be an alternative/complementary tool for patients, particularly those with chronic respiratory diseases.
Assuntos
Asma , Telemedicina , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos Prospectivos , Telemedicina/métodos , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial , Comunicação por VideoconferênciaRESUMO
Lung hyperinflation is an important therapeutic target in symptomatic emphysema patients. Endobronchial therapies that reduce end-expiratory lung volume are increasingly being used in advanced cases. However, there is paucity of data regarding the effects of these therapies on the heart functions. The aim of this study is to evaluate the right ventricular functions before and after the procedure in patients who underwent endobronchial coil therapy (EBCT).Patients who were between 18 and 80 years of age and scheduled for EBCT with GOLD 3-4 were enrolled in the study. Right heart functions were evaluated using MPI, TAS, TAPSE. Right atrium area and maximum velocity of tricuspid regurgitation were also noted.A total of 23 patients were enrolled in the study. 21 patients underwent bilateral intervention, while only 2 patients received unilateral treatment. There was an improvement in MPI (0.49 ± 0.15 vs 0.39 ± 0.11, p < 0.001) and TAS (11.6 (9 - 15) vs 13.2 (9.80 - 17.0), p = 0.001). Peak TRV (2.52 ± 0.6, 2.38 ± 0.6, p = 0.02) and PASP values were lower in the post-operative period (41.15 ± 5.94 vs 36.83 ± 8.01 p = 0.019).In this current study, we found improved echocardiographic RtV parameters in patients who received EBCT treatment.
Assuntos
Broncoscopia , Pneumonectomia , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/cirurgia , Função Ventricular Direita/fisiologia , Idoso , Ecocardiografia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos , Estudos Prospectivos , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/diagnóstico por imagem , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/fisiopatologia , Radiografia , Volume SistólicoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Bronchoscopic volume reduction treatments are among the important alternatives for selected emphysema patients with a dyspneic course despite optimal medical treatment. Our aim was to carry out a retrospective scan of the data for COPD patients subject to coil treatment at our center for assessing whether coil procedure has an impact on the respiratory symptom and pulmonary function tests in COPD patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The data of 41 patients with severe emphysema and treated with coils between 2017-2020 were evaluated retrospectively. Cardiopulmonary rehabilitation programs were completed for all patients prior to the procedure and they were assessed with pulmonary function test (PFT), diffusing capacity for carbonmonoxide test (DLCO), body plethysmography, 6-minute walk test, ventilation/perfusion scintigraphy, St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). Data acquired prior to the procedure and 3rd month control data after the procedure were recorded and SGRQ was applied via face-to-face interviews during the controls by doctors working on Pulmonary Diseases as was the case before the procedure. RESULT: SGRQ questionnaires of 32 patients were evaluated. Statistically significant changes were observed after the procedure in symptom, activity, impact score and total score which were calculated prior to the procedure. Pre and post procedure FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC, PEF, FEF25/75 parameters were used for the comparison made via SFT. Statistically significant changes were observed in FEV1, FVC, FEF25/75 when the pre and post-procedure SFT parameters of the 32 patients included in the study were compared. CONCLUSIONS: A statistically significant improvement was observed in the PFT parameters and quality of life questionnaires following the coil procedure which is a bronchoscopic volume reduction procedure.
Assuntos
Enfisema Pulmonar/terapia , Idoso , Broncoscopia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Enfisema Pulmonar/fisiopatologia , Enfisema Pulmonar/psicologia , Qualidade de Vida , Testes de Função Respiratória , Estudos Retrospectivos , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is an effective treatment method for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, individuals with chronic diseases that require lifelong treatment and experience exacerbations need motivational methods. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine the effects of virtual reality on symptoms, daily living activity, functional capacity, anxiety and depression levels in COPD exacerbation. METHODS: Fifty patients hospitalized for COPD exacerbation were included in the study. They were randomly assigned to two groups. Twenty-five patients participated in a traditional PR (once-daily until discharge), including pedaling exercises. The second/25 patients followed the same protocol but experienced cycling simulation in the forest via virtual reality (VR + PR). All patients were evaluated using 1-minute/Sit-to-Stand test (STST), modified-Medical Research Council (mMRC) scale, COPD Assessment test (CAT), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and London Chest Activities of Daily Living (LCADL) before and after the treatment. RESULTS: The STST showed an increase in both groups post-treatment, notably higher in the VR + PR (p = 0.037). Dyspnea levels and CAT scores decreased in all patients, but the decrease was greater in the PR + VR group for both parameters (p = 0.062, p = 0.003; respectively). Both groups experienced a reduction in the HADS scores compared to the pre-treatment, with a more significant decrease in depression and the total score in the VR + PR (p < 0.05). LCADL's sub-parameters and total score, excluding household, decreased in both groups after treatment (p < 0.05). The improvement was more substantial in the VR + PR. CONCLUSIONS: Virtual reality provides benefits in the management of COPD exacerbations and can be used safely. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTIRATION: Registered at clinicaltrials.gov, registration ID: NCT05687396, URL: www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov.
Assuntos
Atividades Cotidianas , Ansiedade , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica , Realidade Virtual , Humanos , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/reabilitação , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/fisiopatologia , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/psicologia , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ansiedade/psicologia , Progressão da Doença , Depressão/psicologia , Depressão/terapia , Resultado do Tratamento , Terapia por Exercício/métodos , Dispneia/reabilitação , Dispneia/psicologia , Dispneia/etiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Telemedicine has been defined as a valuable tool in delivering care for COVID-19 patients. However, clinicians and policymakers should be convinced that traditional and new technological methods of clinical management may be equally effective. The purpose of this study was to generate some initial recommendations based on the clinical utility of videoconference consultation in forward triage and follow-up for COVID-19 patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional study evaluated the medical records of 100 COVID-19 patients consulted using a videoconference program (Skype), from September 1, 2020, to February 3, 2021. The data were analyzed on demographic characteristics, disease history, the need for physical examination after videoconference consultation, pre-diagnostics and diagnostics, treatment decisions, number of videoconference consultation sessions in follow-up, duration of sessions, and final outcome. RESULTS: The male COVID-19 patients constituted 54% of the total sample. The median age was 51 (42-61) years. The median duration of the initial videoconference consultation session was 16 (12-21) minutes. Following the initial videoconference consultation session, 14 patients required follow-up with all face-to-face visits; the remaining patients were primarily followed with videoconference consultation sessions. For 25 patients, it was sufficient to provide only videoconference consultation sessions; they were not required to be in the hospital for physical examination or any subsequent investigation at all. A total of 14 patients were hospitalized. There was no statistically significant difference between the high-risk group and the other patients according to the components of the disease management process via videoconference consultation. CONCLUSION: Videoconference consultation enables a holistic assessment regardless of the patient's characteristics and allows for more time to be spent on each patient, particularly during the pandemic period without risk of contagion. It can be used as a forward triage and follow-up tool to identify patients in need of emergency hospitalization and continuous health care.
RESUMO
Computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography (PET) are the most commonly used methods for diagnosis and staging in both malignant and benign diseases of the lung parenchyma and mediastinum. Endobronchial ultrasonography (EBUS) guided transbronchial needle aspiration biopsy (TBNA) has become widespread in recent years because it allows minimally invasive tissue sampling. PET-CT has high sensitivity in the diagnosis of malignancy but has low specificity. The false positive rate is high with the SUVmax 2.5 cutoff value, which is widely used in studies about malignancy. In our study, we evaluated lymph nodes with high F18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake on PET/CT and sampled by EBUS-TBNA. We aimed to calculate the new SUVmax cutoff values in the differentiation of malignancy. Our study included 103 patients who were examined for any reason and who underwent biopsy with EBUS-TBNA due to mediastinal or hilar lymph node enlargement on PET-CT. The relationship between PET-CT findings and EBUS findings, EBUS-TBNA results was evaluated. Biopsies were taken from 140 lymph nodes in 103 patients included in our study, and 39 (27.8%) were diagnosed as malignant. In our study, when the SUVmax cutoff value in PET-CT is taken as 2.54, the sensitivity is 98%, but the specificity remains at the level of 12%. When the SUVmax cutoff value in PET-CT was taken as 4.58, the sensitivity was 92% and the specificity was 49%. When this value was accepted as 5.25, and 6.09 the sensitivity was respectively 90% and 85%, the specificity was respectively 52% and 60%. In evaluations, we conducted in order to determine different SUVmax cutoff values that can be used for higher sensitivity and specificity in malignancy studies, the cutoff values were 4.58, 5.25, and 6.09. It is thought that these cutoff values will be useful both for diagnosing malignancy and for distinguishing benign pathologies.
Assuntos
Neoplasias , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons combinada à Tomografia Computadorizada , Humanos , Mediastino , Biópsia por Agulha Fina , Linfonodos/diagnóstico por imagem , PulmãoRESUMO
Background: The coronavirus disease-2019 pandemic has contributed to work-related psychosocial risks in healthcare workers. Aims: To evaluate the perceived need for mental health services and related factors in Turkish healthcare workers practicing in pandemic hospitals. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: Data were collected from face-to-face interviews with healthcare workers at 19 pandemic hospitals in 13 provinces between September and November 2021. The study survey included the evaluation of the perceived need for and utilization of mental health services in the previous year, as well as sociodemographic, health-related, and work-related characteristics, the General Health Questionnaire-12, the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQoL-BREF) questionnaire, and the Fear of coronavirus disease-2019 scale (FCV-19S). Results: Of 1,556 participants, 522 (33.5%) reported a perceived need for mental health services, but only 133 (8.5%) reported receiving these services. Multiple logistic regression analysis of the perceived need for mental health services revealed significant relationships with lower age, female sex, being a current smoker, having a chronic disease, having a mental disorder, coronavirus disease-2019 contact within the last three months in settings other than the home or workplace, a positive coronavirus disease-2019 vaccination history, being a physician, being a non-physician healthcare professional, and coronavirus disease-2019 contact within the last three months at work. After adjustment for these characteristics, higher General Health Questionnaire-12 and FCV-19S scores and lower WHOQoL-BREF domain scores were related to the perceived need for mental health services in logistic regression analyses. Conclusion: The findings indicate a substantial need for mental health services amongst Turkish healthcare workers during the pandemic and outline participants' characteristics regarding high-priority groups for the intervention. Future research may focus on developing actions and evaluating their efficiency.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Serviços de Saúde Mental , Humanos , Feminino , Estudos Transversais , Pandemias , Turquia/epidemiologia , Qualidade de Vida , Pessoal de Saúde/psicologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Before beginning lung cancer treatment, it is necessary to complete procedures such as suspecting lung cancer, obtaining a pathologic diagnosis, and staging. This study aimed to investigate the processes from suspicion of lung cancer to diagnosis, staging, and treatment initiation. METHODS: The study was designed as a multicenter and cross-sectional study. Patients with lung cancer from various health institutions located in all geographic regions of Turkey were included in the study. The sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of the patients, the characteristics of the health institutions and geographic regions, and other variables of the lung cancer process were recorded. The time from suspicion of lung cancer to pathologic diagnosis, radiologic staging, and treatment initiation, as well as influencing factors, were investigated. RESULTS: The study included 1410 patients from 29 different medical centers. The mean time from the initial suspicion of lung cancer to the pathologic diagnosis was 48.0 ± 52.6 days, 39.0 ± 52.7 days for radiologic staging, and 74.9 ± 65.5 days for treatment initiation. The residential areas with the most suspected lung cancer cases were highly developed socioeconomic zones. Primary healthcare services accounted for only 0.4% of patients with suspected lung cancer. The time to pathologic diagnosis was longer in the Marmara region, and the wait time for staging and treatment initiation was longer in Eastern and Southeastern Anatolia. Patients who presented to chest disease referral hospitals with peripheral lesions, those with early-stage disease, and those who were diagnosed surgically had significantly longer wait times. CONCLUSION: The time between pathologic diagnosis, staging, and treatment initiation in lung cancer was longer than expected. Increasing the role of primary healthcare services and distributing socioeconomic resources more equally will contribute to shortening the time to diagnosis and improve treatment processes for lung cancer.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Pulmonares , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Turquia/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de SaúdeRESUMO
ABSTRACT: Sarcoidosis is a multisystem granulomatous disease which is observed worldwide. Sarcoidosis is one of the common causes of ocular inflammation. The choroidal vascularity index, defined as the ratio of the luminal area to the total choroidal area, is used as one of the biomarkers for assessing the choroid vascular state. We aimed to compare choroidal vascularity index and thickness measurements between sarcoidosis patients and healthy controls.Thirty-one patients with sarcoidosis and 31 age-gender matched healthy participants were recruited in this cross-sectional and comparative study. Choroidal vascularity index was defined as the ratio of luminal area to total choroidal area after binarization on optical coherence tomography images. Anterior segment examinations included central corneal thickness, corneal volume, anterior chamber depth, anterior chamber volume, and iridocorneal angle. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography was used to measure peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, choroidal thickness, and retinal vessel caliber.The mean choroidal vascularity index value was 61.6% in sarcoidosis patients and 62.4% in healthy controls (Pâ=â.69). The choroidal vascularity index and thickness were significantly correlated in both sarcoidosis (râ=â0.41, Pâ=â.026) and control groups (râ=â0.51, Pâ=â.006). Both the sarcoidosis and control groups had similar measured values for central corneal thickness, corneal volume, anterior chamber depth, anterior chamber volume, and iridocorneal angle (Pâ>â.05). Mean retinal nerve fiber layer, retinal arteriole and venule caliber, and choroidal thickness measurements did not differ significantly between the groups (Pâ>â.05).Sarcoidosis patients in quiescent period have similar choroidal vascularity index and thickness with healthy controls.
Assuntos
Corioide , Sarcoidose , Corioide/diagnóstico por imagem , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Vasos Retinianos , Sarcoidose/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia de Coerência ÓpticaRESUMO
This review aimed to highlight some important points derived from the presentations of the European Respiratory Society 2021 Virtual International Congress by a committee formed by the Early Career Task Group of the Turkish Thoracic Society. We summarized a wide range of topics including current developments of respiratory diseases and provided an overview of important and striking topics of the congress. Our primary motivation was to give some up-to-date information and new developments discussed during congress especially for the pulmonologists who did not have a chance to follow the congress. This review also committed an opportunity to get an overview of the newest data in the diverse fields of respiratory medicine such as post-coronavirus disease 2019, some new interventional and technologic developments related to respiratory health, and new treatment strategies.
RESUMO
Background: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been used in acute pulmonary thromboembolism as an alternative to warfarin due to drug interactions, narrow therapeutic range, and necessary close International Normalized Ratio (INR) monitoring. Phase 3 study results have reported that these drugs are at least as effective as warfarin and beneficial in terms of bleeding; however, studies that present up-to-date life data are necessary. Aims: To evaluate the frequency of using DOACs, which are prescribed with a limited number of indications in our country, and real-life data results. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: This cross-sectional survey collected the clinical data (history, current treatment, treatment duration, etc.) of patients with pulmonary thromboembolism and who applied to the physician for follow-up between October 15, 2019, and March 15, 2020. The researchers kept the patient records sequentially. Results: Data from 836 patients with acute pulmonary thromboembolism from 25 centers were collected, and DOAC was used in 320 (38.5%) of them. The most preferred DOAC was rivaroxaban (n = 294, 91.9%). DOAC was mostly preferred because it could not provide an effective INR level with warfarin (n=133, 41.6%). Bleeding was observed in 13 (4%) patients. Conclusion: The use of direct oral anticoagulants is becoming almost as widespread as conventional therapy. Real-life data results are important for their contribution to clinical practice.
Assuntos
Anticoagulantes , Embolia Pulmonar , Doença Aguda , Administração Oral , Anticoagulantes/administração & dosagem , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Estudos Transversais , Hemorragia/induzido quimicamente , Hemorragia/epidemiologia , Humanos , Embolia Pulmonar/tratamento farmacológico , Pirazóis/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Turquia , Varfarina/administração & dosagem , Varfarina/efeitos adversosRESUMO
In this article, Early Career Task Force Group members of the Turkish Thoracic Society summarize the European Respiratory Society 2020 virtual congress. Current developments in the field of respiratory diseases were compiled with the addition of sessions specific to coronavirus disease 2019 this year. Almost all of the congress sessions were examined, and the important and striking results of the congress were highlighted. Congress sessions were attended by expert researchers, and the prominent messages of each session were highlighted in short summaries. They were then grouped under relevant titles and ranked in order of meaning and relation. It was finalized by a team of researchers.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: We aimed to assess the severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia on computed tomography (CT) using quantitative (QCT) and semiquantitative (SCT) assessments and compare with the clinical findings. METHODS: Two observers independently examined the CT images of COVID-19 patients, and the SCT severity score was calculated. The SCT score was calculated as the sum of values ranging from 0 to 4, according to the volumetric rate of involvement for each lung lobe. In quantitative assessment, total lung volume (TLV) was automatically calculated from CT density values between -200 and -950 HU. Besides, healthy lung volume (HLV) was calculated from voxels between -800 and -950 HU. The QCT score was calculated with the following formula: (TLV - HLV / TLV) ×100. All patients were clinically divided into four groups: mild, common, severe, and critical. Interobserver agreement for SCT assessment was investigated using the Cohen's Kappa statistics (κ). Pearson's correlation coefficient was used for the relationship between continuous data. The diagnostic accuracy of SCT and QCT in the differentiation of clinically limited (mild, common) and extensive (severe, critical) disease was investigated using ROC analysis. RESULTS: Seventy-six patients with a diagnosis of COVID-19 were included. There was good agreement between the two observers in the SCT evaluation of pulmonary disease severity (κ = 0.796; 95% CI, 0.751-0.841). A significant correlation was found between QCT and SCT scores (p < 0.001, r = 0.661). Both QCT and SCT scores showed a significant correlation with clinical severity score (p < 0.001, r = 0.620 and p = 0.004, r = 0.529, respectively). The ROC analysis revealed the AUC of QCT and SCT for differentiation of limited and extensive disease as 0.873 (95% CI, 0.774-0.972) and 0.816 (95% CI, 0.673-0.959), respectively. CONCLUSION: The QCT assessment is an objective method in the evaluation of COVID-19 severity and is more successful than semiquantitative CT assessment to discriminate extensive from limited disease.
Assuntos
COVID-19/diagnóstico por imagem , Pulmão/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Tórax/diagnóstico por imagem , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Although the sensitivity of reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is low in the diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), it is the gold standard. Clinical improvement is prioritized in the follow-up of patients with COVID-19 who are followed as possible or definitive cases. Although the priority in the discharge decision is the resolution of complaints, it is also important to see radiological improvement and RT-PCR negativity. A total of 2 of our patients who were hospitalized and treated in our clinic with a diagnosis of COVID-19 were discharged after their complaints were resolved and their treatment was completed. The patients had 2 negative RT-PCR results at discharge. Both of them presented to the hospital with symptoms such as fever, cough, and shortness of breath after the discharge, and both showed positive RT-PCR results. Considering recurrent COVID-19 infection, we aimed to present treatment and the 2 cases we followed.
RESUMO
As coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) spreads across the world, the ongoing clinical trials are leading to a big race worldwide to develop a treatment that will help control the pandemic. Unfortunately, COVID-19 does not have any known effective treatment with reliable study results yet. In this pandemic, there is not a lot of time to develop a new specific agent because of the rapid spread of the disease. The process of developing a vaccine is long and requires hard work. Although the pathophysiology of the disease is not fully understood, some of the proposed treatment alternatives are based on old evidence and some have been used with the idea that they might work owing to their mechanism of action. The efficacy, reliability, and safety of the currently available treatment alternatives are therefore a matter of debate. Currently, the main therapies used in the treatment of COVID-19 are antiviral drugs and chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine. Other proposed options include tocilizumab, convalescent plasma, and steroids, but the mainstay of the treatment in intensive care units remains supportive therapies.