Group B Streptococcus Infection and Obstetric Hemorrhage Risk.

OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the association between GBS infection and maternal risk for obstetric hemorrhage (OBH) and OBH-related morbidities (OBH-M). METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of all deliveries with a documented GBS status at a single large academic medical center from 2018 to 2019. GBS status was determined by either urine culture or rectovaginal culture collected during the antepartum period. The primary outcomes were quantitative blood loss (QBL), OBH, and a composite of OBH-M. Secondary outcomes were individual components of the OBH-M composite and frequency of hemorrhage-related interventions utilized intrapartum and postpartum. A stratified analysis was conducted examining only patients who were diagnosed intrapartum with an intrapartum intraamniotic infection (III). RESULTS: Of 4679 pregnant individuals who delivered a live infant between January 1, 2018 and January 1,2019 with a documented GBS status, 1,487 were identified as GBS positive (+) and 3192 were identified as GBS negative (-). The GBS + group did not have significantly higher QBL (p = 0.29) or rate of OBH (p = 0.35). There were no significant differences by GBS status in OBH morbidity (p = 0.79) or its individual components or frequency of individual pharmacologic or non-pharmacologic OBHrelated interventions. There were also no significant differences by GBS status among patients with an III. CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE: GBS infection at the time of delivery was not associated with increased risk for OBH or OBH-M. Further research is needed to further explore the relationship between peripartum infections and OBH risk.

Association between duration of intrapartum oxytocin exposure and obstetric hemorrhage.

PURPOSE: Prolonged duration of intrapartum oxytocin exposure is included as a risk factor within widely adopted obstetric hemorrhage risk stratification tools. However, the duration of exposure that confers increased risk is poorly understood. This study aimed to assess the association between duration of intrapartum oxytocin exposure and obstetric blood loss, as measured by quantitative blood loss, and hemorrhage-related maternal morbidity. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of all deliveries from 2018 to 2019 at a single medical center. We included patients who had received any intrapartum oxytocin, and we categorized them into 1 of 5 groups: > 0-2, ≥ 2-4, ≥ 4-6, ≥ 6-12, and ≥ 12 h of intrapartum oxytocin exposure. The primary outcomes were mean quantitative blood loss, proportion with obstetric hemorrhage (defined as quantitative blood loss ≥ 1000 mL), and proportion with obstetric hemorrhage-related morbidity, a composite of hemorrhage-related morbidity outcomes. Secondary outcomes were hemorrhage-related pharmacologic and procedural interventions. A stratified analysis was also conducted to examine primary and secondary outcomes by delivery mode. RESULTS: Of 5332 deliveries between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2019 at our institution, 2232 (41.9%) utilized oxytocin for induction or augmentation. 326 (14.6%) had exposure of > 0-2 h, 295 (13.2%) ≥ 2-4 h, 298 (13.4%) ≥ 4-6 h, 562 (25.2%) ≥ 6-12 h, and 751 (33.6%) ≥ 12 h. Across all deliveries, there was higher mean quantitative blood loss (p < 0.01) as well as increased odds of obstetric hemorrhage (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.21-1.91) for those with ≥ 12 h of oxytocin compared to all groups between > 0-12 h of exposure. In our stratified analysis, ≥ 12 h of oxytocin exposure was associated with higher mean quantitative blood loss (p = 0.04) and odds of obstetric hemorrhage in vaginal deliveries (aOR 1.47, 95% CI: 1.03-2.11), though not in cesarean deliveries (aOR 1.16, 95% CI 0.82-1.62). There were no differences in proportion with obstetric hemorrhage-related morbidity across all deliveries (p = 0.40) or in the stratified analysis. CONCLUSION: Intrapartum oxytocin exposure of ≥ 12 h was associated with increased quantitative blood loss and odds of obstetric hemorrhage in vaginal, but not cesarean, deliveries.

Intrapartum Risk Factors and Prediction of Obstetric Hemorrhage-Related Morbidity.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess whether inclusion of intrapartum risk factors improves our obstetric hemorrhage risk stratification tool in predicting obstetric hemorrhage, transfusion, and related severe morbidity. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study using all live deliveries at a single institution over a 2-year period (n = 5,332). Obstetric hemorrhage risk factors, hemorrhage burden, and severe maternal morbidity index outcomes were assessed through chart abstraction. Hemorrhage risk was assessed at (1) "time of admission" through chart abstraction and (2) "predelivery" by calculation after inclusion of all abstracted intrapartum risk factors. Admission high risk was compared with predelivery high risk for sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio in predicting obstetric hemorrhage, obstetric hemorrhage requiring transfusion, and obstetric hemorrhage-related severe morbidity. Significance levels were calculated using descriptive statistical methods including chi-squared tests and McNemar's tests. RESULTS: The sensitivities of the risk assessment tool using admission risk classification for high-risk patients is 25% for obstetric hemorrhage, 37% for obstetric hemorrhage requiring transfusion, and 22% for obstetric hemorrhage-related severe morbidity. After intrapartum factor inclusion, the sensitivities increase to 55% for obstetric hemorrhage, 59% for obstetric hemorrhage requiring transfusion, and 47% for obstetric hemorrhage-related severe morbidity. This "predelivery" risk assessment is significantly more sensitive across all three end points (p < 0.001 for all three outcomes). While the positive likelihood ratios for obstetric hemorrhage are equal on admission and predelivery (2.10 on admission and predelivery), they increase after intrapartum factor inclusion for obstetric hemorrhage requiring transfusion and obstetric hemorrhage-related severe morbidity (on admission, 2.74 and 1.6, respectively, and predelivery: 4.57 and 3.58, respectively). CONCLUSION: Inclusion of intrapartum risk factors increases the accuracy of this obstetric hemorrhage risk stratification tool in predicting patients requiring hemorrhage management with transfusion and obstetric hemorrhage-related severe morbidity. KEY POINTS: · There are little data to validate intrapartum hemorrhage risk reassessment.. · Including intrapartum factors improves risk stratification for transfusion and related morbidity.. · Future research should clinically validate risk reassessment in the intrapartum period..

Defining 'obstetric haemorrhage': Blood loss volume and severe morbidity.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Our goal is to describe the association between total quantitative blood loss (QBL) and risk of obstetric haemorrhage-related morbidity (OBH-M) to assess the utility of the current definition of obstetric haemorrhage (OBH). METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study completed of all patients who had a live delivery at the only urban safety-net hospital over a 2-year period from 2018 to 2019. We categorized deliveries into 10 equally sized deciles based on QBL and compared the proportion with OBH-M in each. Among the two deciles with the highest proportions of OBH-M, we stratified deliveries into seven groups of ascending intervals of 250cc QBL. Finally, we compared the positive predictive value (PPV) of the standard definition of OBH (QBL ≥ 1000cc) to a definition extrapolated from our stratified analysis. The primary outcome was proportion of deliveries within each QBL decile affected by OBH-M. The secondary outcome was PPV. RESULTS: We found a significant increase in OBH-M from decile 9 (895-1201cc QBL) to decile 10 (1205-8325cc QBL) (p < 0.001). In our stratified analysis, we found QBL of 1500cc to be an inflection point for an increased proportion of OBH-M. Our secondary analysis showed an increased PPV for OBH-M using QBL of 1500cc (20.5%) compared with that of QBL 1000cc (9.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that a higher QBL threshold than the currently accepted definition of OBH is more predictive of OBH-M.

Evaluating an Interprofessional Trauma-Based Education Course to Advance the Care and Health of Refugees.

Refugee patients benefit from interdisciplinary approaches that address trauma-related migration in culturally responsive ways. This qualitative evaluation assessed the interdisciplinary trauma-based course for refugee populations. The qualitative data comes from focus groups and surveys to evaluate medical, social work, and public health students' perceptions of the interprofessional education course of refugee patient care. The evaluators analyzed qualitative data through a thematic content analysis method. Following key themes emerged from students' reflections: (1) collaboration in interdisciplinary learning, (2) role of clinical learning, (3) skills and knowledge related to refugee population care, (4) improvements for interprofessional education, and (5) strengths of the interprofessional education course. The Interprofessional Refugee Health Elective course enhanced their knowledge and competence in refugee health care. Educators, students, and the patient population will benefit from investing in interprofessional education courses that focus on specific needs and complex care management for refugee patients.

Intrapartum magnesium sulfate exposure and obstetric hemorrhage risk.

BACKGROUND: The gold standard intrapartum treatment for preeclampsia with severe features is magnesium sulfate in order to provide prophylaxis against eclampsia. However, though magnesium sulfate is known to have a relaxant effect on uterine muscle, there have been variable reports in the literature in regard to the association between magnesium and obstetric hemorrhage (OBH). OBJECTIVE: We aim to compare OBH incidence in patients with hypertensive disease of pregnancy (HDP) with or without exposure to intrapartum magnesium sulfate. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of all deliveries at our institution associated with a diagnosis of hypertensive disease of pregnancy (HDP) (e.g. chronic and gestational hypertension, preeclampsia with or without severe features, eclampsia, or HELLP) from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2019. The category of HDP diagnosis was determined by a detailed chart review by trained chart abstractors. The primary outcome was total quantitative blood loss (QBL) and the rate of obstetric hemorrhage. Secondary outcomes included a composite of obstetric hemorrhage-related maternal morbidity outcomes (OBH-M), the individual composite components and the incidence of additional hemorrhage-related interventions (e.g. uterotonics and surgical interventions). We also examined the same primary and secondary outcomes in a stratified analysis based on delivery mode (i.e. vaginal deliveries only and cesarean deliveries only). RESULTS: Of 791 patients with a diagnosis of HDP, 411 patients received magnesium sulfate for eclampsia prophylaxis and 380 patients did not receive magnesium sulfate. For all delivery modes, there was a significantly higher QBL (p < .01), increased rate of OBH (p = .04) and increased OBH-M (p < .01) in deliveries associated with intrapartum exposure to magnesium compared to those without. However, our stratified analysis by delivery mode demonstrated that magnesium-related hemorrhage risk only persisted for vaginal deliveries (QBL p < .01; OBH aOR 1.47, 95% CI: 0.75-2.85; OBH-M aOR 1.47, 95% CI 1.00-7.55) with no significant hemorrhage-related differences among cesareans with or without magnesium exposure (QBL p = .51; OBH aOR 1.45, 95% CI: 0.85-2.47; OBH-M 1.50 95% CI: 0.70-3.23). CONCLUSION: Intrapartum exposure to magnesium sulfate use was associated with an increase in QBL and risk of OBH-M in vaginal deliveries, but not associated with any hemorrhage-related outcome differences in cesarean deliveries. More research is needed to explore the effects of hypertensive disease, magnesium exposure, and delivery mode on obstetric hemorrhage risk.

Prevalence of STIs, sexual practices and substance use among 2083 sexually active unmarried women in Lebanon.

Access to sexual and reproductive health in conservative communities and in the MENA region are particularly limited and, as such, increase women's vulnerability to unwanted pregnancies, unsafe abortions, and sexually transmitted infections (STIs). The aim was to assess the prevalence of STIs, sexual practices, recreational drug-use and their possible associations among cisgender unmarried women residing in Lebanon. Data on demographics, sexual practices and substance-use were collected from 2083 unmarried cisgender women who voluntarily attended a sexual health clinic in Lebanon between 2015 and 2019. They tested for HIV, Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C and Syphilis through rapid testing. Other infections (genital warts, Neisseria gonorrhea/Chlamydia trachomatis) were screened for. Regression models were computed between variables. There were two cases of HIV, one of Hepatitis B and syphilis, and no cases of Hepatitis C. Genital warts were present in 15% and symptoms indicative of Neisseria gonorrhea/Chlamydia trachomatis in 14%. Inconsistent condom-use (81%) was significantly associated with number of partners (adj. OR: 0.4). Inconsistent condom-use discussion with partners (33%) was significantly associated with unemployment (adj OR: 1.7), recreational drug-use (adj. OR: 1.4), and number of partners (adj. ORs 3.7-4.4). Unwanted pregnancies (11%) were significantly associated with age (adj. ORs 0.1-0.37), recreational drug-use (adj. OR: 2), using intrauterine device (adj. OR:2.9) and natural birth control methods (adj. OR: 2.4). Recreational drug-use (33%) was significantly associated with age (adj ORs 1.9-2.2), and smoking status (adj. OR: 0.6). The results indicate an urgent need for: (1) Accessible, non-stigmatizing, and inclusive sexual health services dedicated to women's sexual health; (2) Comprehensive and non-stigmatizing sexual health education for all, but especially women, in order to promote safer sexual practices and effective decision making with regards to contraception and condom-use.

Prevalence of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections and their association with sexual practices and substance use among 2238 MSM in Lebanon.

UNAIDS report documents 95% increase in new HIV infections among key populations in Eastern Europe and Middle East and North Africa region. Data on HIV and STIs among MSM in Lebanon is still scarce. Therefore, the aim was to assess prevalence of HIV and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) among men who have sex with men (MSM) in Lebanon and associations with sexual practices and substance-use. 2238 MSM attended a sexual health clinic in Lebanon between 2015-2018. Demographics, substance-use and sexual practices were collected. Attendees tested for HIV and other STIs. HIV infection was diagnosed in 5.6% of the sample. Only 19% received sexual health education from reliable sources (school/university/healthcare workers), 78% reported having multiple partners in the past three months (2-5 partners: 58%, 6+: 20%) and 67% reported inconsistent condom-use. Moreover, 40% of HIV + cases were returning attendees who already received information about condom-use. Additionally, having only a school level education (11%) increases the odds of having inconsistent condom-use with casual partners (adj.OR:1.9, p < 0.001). The results reflect the urgent need for: (1) accurate and comprehensive sexual health and harm reduction education and promotion in Lebanon; (2) making pre-exposure prophylaxis available for free to key populations to contain the epidemics at an early stage.