Novel Therapeutics and Upcoming Clinical Trials Targeting Inflammation in Cardiovascular Diseases.

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains a major health burden despite significant therapeutic advances accomplished over the last decades. It is widely and increasingly recognized that systemic inflammation not only represents a major cardiovascular risk and prognostic factor but also plays pivotal roles in CVD development and progression. Despite compelling preclinical evidence suggesting large potential of anti-inflammatory pharmacological interventions across numerous CVDs, clinical translation remains incomplete, mainly due to (1) yet undefined molecular signaling; (2) challenges of safety and efficacy profile of anti-inflammatory drugs; and (3) difficulties in identifying optimal patient candidates and responders to anti-inflammatory therapeutics, as well as optimal therapeutic windows. Randomized controlled trials demonstrated the safety/efficacy of canakinumab and colchicine in secondary cardiovascular prevention, providing confirmation for the involvement of a specific inflammatory pathway (NLRP3 [NACHT, LRR, and PYD domain-containing protein 3] inflammasome/IL [interleukin]-1ß) in atherosclerotic CVD. Colchicine was recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for this indication. Diverse anti-inflammatory drugs targeting distinct inflammatory pathways are widely used for the management of other CVDs including myocarditis and pericarditis. Ongoing research efforts are directed to implementing anti-inflammatory therapeutics across a growing number of CVDs, through repurposing of available anti-inflammatory drugs and development of novel anti-inflammatory compounds, which are herein concisely discussed. This review also summarizes the main characteristics and findings of completed and upcoming randomized controlled trials directly targeting inflammation in CVDs and discusses the major challenges and future perspectives in the exciting and constantly expanding landscape of cardioimmunology.

Clonal Hematopoiesis in Clinical and Experimental Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.

BACKGROUND: Clonal hematopoiesis (CH), which results from an array of nonmalignant driver gene mutations, can lead to altered immune cell function and chronic disease, and has been associated with worse outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction. However, the role of CH in the prognosis of HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) has been understudied. This study aimed to characterize CH in patients with HFpEF and elucidate its causal role in a murine model. METHODS: Using a panel of 20 candidate CH driver genes and a variant allele fraction cutoff of 0.5%, ultradeep error-corrected sequencing identified CH in a cohort of 81 patients with HFpEF (mean age, 71±6 years; ejection fraction, 63±5%) and 36 controls without a diagnosis of HFpEF (mean age, 74±7 years; ejection fraction, 61.5±8%). CH was also evaluated in a replication cohort of 59 individuals with HFpEF. RESULTS: Compared with controls, there was an enrichment of TET2-mediated CH in the HFpEF patient cohort (12% versus 0%, respectively; P=0.02). In the HFpEF cohort, patients with CH exhibited exacerbated diastolic dysfunction in terms of E/e' (14.9 versus 11.7, respectively; P=0.0096) and E/A (1.69 versus 0.89, respectively; P=0.0206) compared with those without CH. The association of CH with exacerbated diastolic dysfunction was corroborated in a validation cohort of individuals with HFpEF. In accordance, patients with HFpEF, an age ≥70 years, and CH exhibited worse prognosis in terms of 5-year cardiovascular-related hospitalization rate (hazard ratio, 5.06; P=0.042) compared with patients with HFpEF and an age ≥70 years without CH. To investigate the causal role of CH in HFpEF, nonconditioned mice underwent adoptive transfer with Tet2-wild-type or Tet2-deficient bone marrow and were subsequently subjected to a high-fat diet/L-NAME (Nω-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester) combination treatment to induce features of HFpEF. This model of Tet2-CH exacerbated cardiac hypertrophy by heart weight/tibia length and cardiomyocyte size, diastolic dysfunction by E/e' and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, and cardiac fibrosis compared with the Tet2-wild-type condition. CONCLUSIONS: CH is associated with worse heart function and prognosis in patients with HFpEF, and a murine experimental model of Tet2-mediated CH displays greater features of HFpEF.

Relationship between central autonomic effective connectivity and heart rate variability: A Resting-state fMRI dynamic causal modeling study.

The central autonomic network (CAN) serves as a regulatory hub with top-down regulatory control and integration of bottom-up physiological feedback via the autonomic nervous system. Heart rate variability (HRV)-the time variance of the heart's beat-to-beat intervals-is an index of the CAN's affective and behavioral regulatory capacity. Although neural functional connectivities that are associated with HRV and CAN have been well studied, no published report to date has studied effective (directional) connectivities (EC) that are associated with HRV and CAN. Better understanding of neural EC in the brain has the potential to improve our understanding of how the CAN sub-regions regulate HRV. To begin to address this knowledge gap, we employed resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging and dynamic causal modeling (DCM) with parametric empirical Bayes analyses in 34 healthy adults (19 females; mean age= 32.68 years [SD= 14.09], age range 18-68 years) to examine the bottom-up and top-down neural circuits associated with HRV. Throughout the whole brain, we identified 12 regions associated with HRV. DCM analyses revealed that the ECs from the right amygdala to the anterior cingulate cortex and to the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex had a negative linear relationship with HRV and a positive linear relationship with heart rate. These findings suggest that ECs from the amygdala to the prefrontal cortex may represent a neural circuit associated with regulation of cardiodynamics.

Phase 3 Trial of Interleukin-1 Trap Rilonacept in Recurrent Pericarditis.

BACKGROUND: Interleukin-1 has been implicated as a mediator of recurrent pericarditis. The efficacy and safety of rilonacept, an interleukin-1α and interleukin-1ß cytokine trap, were studied previously in a phase 2 trial involving patients with recurrent pericarditis. METHODS: We conducted a phase 3 multicenter, double-blind, event-driven, randomized-withdrawal trial of rilonacept in patients with acute symptoms of recurrent pericarditis (as assessed on a patient-reported scale) and systemic inflammation (as shown by an elevated C-reactive protein [CRP] level). Patients presenting with pericarditis recurrence while receiving standard therapy were enrolled in a 12-week run-in period, during which rilonacept was initiated and background medications were discontinued. Patients who had a clinical response (i.e., met prespecified response criteria) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive continued rilonacept monotherapy or placebo, administered subcutaneously once weekly. The primary efficacy end point, assessed with a Cox proportional-hazards model, was the time to the first pericarditis recurrence. Safety was also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 86 patients with pericarditis pain and an elevated CRP level were enrolled in the run-in period. During the run-in period, the median time to resolution or near-resolution of pain was 5 days, and the median time to normalization of the CRP level was 7 days. A total of 61 patients underwent randomization. During the randomized-withdrawal period, there were too few recurrence events in the rilonacept group to allow for the median time to the first adjudicated recurrence to be calculated; the median time to the first adjudicated recurrence in the placebo group was 8.6 weeks (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.0 to 11.7; hazard ratio in a Cox proportional-hazards model, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.18; P<0.001 by the log-rank test). During this period, 2 of 30 patients (7%) in the rilonacept group had a pericarditis recurrence, as compared with 23 of 31 patients (74%) in the placebo group. In the run-in period, 4 patients had adverse events leading to the discontinuation of rilonacept therapy. The most common adverse events with rilonacept were injection-site reactions and upper respiratory tract infections. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with recurrent pericarditis, rilonacept led to rapid resolution of recurrent pericarditis episodes and to a significantly lower risk of pericarditis recurrence than placebo. (Funded by Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals; RHAPSODY ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03737110.).

Fatty acid composition MRI of epicardial adipose tissue: Methods and detection of proinflammatory biomarkers in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients.

PURPOSE: To develop a method for quantifying the fatty acid composition (FAC) of human epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) using accelerated MRI and identify its potential for detecting proinflammatory biomarkers in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS: A multi-echo radial gradient-echo sequence was developed for accelerated imaging during a breath hold using a locally low-rank denoising technique to reconstruct undersampled images. FAC mapping was achieved by fitting the multi-echo images to a multi-resonance complex signal model based on triglyceride characterization. Validation of the method was assessed using a phantom comprised of multiple oils. In vivo imaging was performed in STEMI patients (n = 21; 14 males/seven females). FAC was quantified in EAT, subcutaneous AT, and abdominal visceral AT. RESULTS: Phantom validation demonstrated strong correlations (r > 0.97) and statistical significance (p < 0.0001) between measured and reference proton density fat fraction and FAC values. In vivo imaging of STEMI patients revealed a distinct EAT FAC profile compared to subcutaneous AT and abdominal visceral AT. EAT FAC parameters had significant correlations with left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic volume index (p < 0.05), LV end-systolic volume index (p < 0.05), and LV mass index (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Accelerated MRI enabled accurate quantification of human EAT FAC. The relationships between the EAT FAC profile and LV structure and function in STEMI patients suggest the potential of EAT FAC MRI as a biomarker for adipose tissue quality and inflammatory status in cardiovascular disease.

The role and application of current pharmacological management in patients with advanced heart failure.

In the last decades, several classifications and definitions have been proposed for advanced heart failure (ADVHF) patients, including clinical, functional, hemodynamic, imaging, and electrocardiographic features. Despite different inclusion criteria, ADVHF is characterized by some common items, such as drug intolerance, low arterial pressure, multiple organ dysfunction, chronic kidney disease, and diuretic use dependency. Additional features include fatigue, hypotension, hyponatremia, and unintentional weight loss associated with a specific laboratory profile reflecting systemic multiorgan dysfunction. Notably, studies evaluating guideline-directed medical therapy recently endorsed by guidelines in stable HF, including the 4 drug classes all together (i.e., betablocker, mineral corticoid antagonist, renin angiotensin inhibitors/neprilysin inhibitors, and sodium glucose transporter inhibitors), remain scarcely analyzed in ADVHF and New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class IV. Additionally, due to the common conditions associated with advanced stages, the balance between drug tolerance and potential benefits of the contemporary use of all agents is questioned. Therefore, less hard endpoints, such as exercise tolerance, quality of life (QoL) and self-competency, are not clearly demonstrated. Specific analyses evaluating outcome and rehospitalization of each drug provided conflicting results and are often limited to subjects with stable conditions and less advanced NYHA class. Current European Society of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ESC/AHA) Guidelines do not indicate the type of treatment, dosage, and administration modalities, and they do not suggest specific indications for ADVHF patients. Due to these concerns, there is an impelling need to understand what drugs may be used as the first line, what management leads to the better outcome, and what is the best treatment algorithm in this setting. In this paper, we summarize the most common pitfalls and limitations for the use of the traditional agents, and we propose a personalized approach aiming at preserve drug tolerance and maintaining adverse event protection and satisfactory QoL.

Pathogenic pathways and therapeutic targets of inflammation in heart diseases: A focus on Interleukin-1.

BACKGROUND: An exuberant and dysregulated inflammatory response contributes to the development and progression of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). METHODS: This narrative review includes original articles and reviews published over the past 20 years and found through PubMed. The following search terms (or combination of terms) were considered: "acute pericarditis," "recurrent pericarditis," "myocarditis," "cardiac sarcoidosis," "atherosclerosis," "acute myocardial infarction," "inflammation," "NLRP3 inflammasome," "Interleukin-1" and "treatment." RESULTS: Recent evidence supports the role of inflammation across a wide spectrum of CVDs including myocarditis, pericarditis, inflammatory cardiomyopathies (i.e. cardiac sarcoidosis) as well as atherosclerotic CVD and heart failure. Interleukins (ILs) are the signalling mediators of the inflammatory response. The NACHT, leucine-rich repeat and pyrin-domain containing protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome play a key role in producing IL-1ß, the prototypical pro-inflammatory cytokine involved in CVDs. Other pro-inflammatory cytokines (e.g. tumour necrosis factor) have been implicated in cardiac sarcoidosis. As a proof of this, IL-1 blockade has been proven efficacious in pericarditis and chronic coronary syndrome. CONCLUSION: Tailored strategies aiming at quenching the inflammatory response have emerged as promising to treat CVDs. In this review article, we summarize recent evidence regarding the role of inflammation across a broad spectrum of CVDs. We also review novel evidence regarding targeted therapeutic strategies.

Novel Therapeutic Insights Into the Treatment of Pericarditis: Targeting the Innate Immune System.

ABSTRACT: Acute pericarditis is characterized by pericardial inflammation that can be treated with anti-inflammatory drugs. A considerable percentage of patients develops recurrent pericarditis with several relapses. In developed countries, the idiopathic form is the most frequent and has a high risk of recurrences. Two pathophysiological mechanisms have been described for idiopathic recurrent pericarditis: autoimmune and autoinflammatory. The autoimmune mechanism is more frequently encountered in patients with rheumatologic disorders, especially systemic lupus erythematosus. The innate immune system plays a central role in the pathophysiology of pericarditis, especially in the autoinflammatory phenotype. Current evidence highlights the central role played by interleukin 1 and NLRP3 (NACHT, leucine-rich repeat, and pyrin domain-containing protein 3) in idiopathic recurrent pericarditis. Accordingly, interleukin 1 blockers have been approved for the treatment of this condition. Neutrophils are likely to be important in such setting; however, their role has only been partially investigated. In the present review, we have collected the current knowledge on the role of innate immune system in pericarditis pathophysiology and how this can be used to provide targeted treatments for patients with recurrent pericarditis.

Interleukin-1 blockade with RPH-104 (goflikicept) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI): secondary endpoints from an international, double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase IIa study.

In a randomized double-blinded clinical trial of patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), goflikicept, an Interleukin-1 (IL-1) blocker, significantly reduced systemic inflammation, measured as the area-under-the-curve (AUC) for high-sensitivity C reactive protein (hsCRP) at 14 days. We report secondary analyses of biomarkers at 28 days, and cardiac function and clinical endpoints at 1 year. Patients received a single administration of goflikicept 80 mg (n=34), goflikicept 160 mg (n=34), or placebo (n=34). Both doses of goflikicept significantly reduced the AUC for hsCRP at 28 days compared with placebo, without statistically significant differences between the doses. There we no statistically significant differences between groups in the AUC for natriuretic peptides at 28 days. There were no significant differences between placebo, goflikicept 80 mg and 160 mg groups in deaths (2.9%, 2.9% and 0%), hospitalization for cardiovascular reasons (9.1%, 5.9%, and 0%), new-onset or progression of heart failure (9.1%, 5.9%, and 5.9%), and new or increased use of loop diuretics (24.2%, 14.7%, and 17.6%), nor in the number of patients with treatment emergent adverse events, with no treatment-related serious adverse events in any group. In conclusion, in patients with STEMI, IL-1 blockade with goflikicept 80 mg or 160 mg was well tolerated and associated with significant reduction of systemic inflammation. Further adequately powered studies are warranted to determine whether the reduction in systemic inflammation with goflikicept translates into a clinical benefit in patients with STEMI.

Diagnostic Strategies for the Assessment of Suspected Stable Coronary Artery Disease : A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: There is uncertainty about which diagnostic strategy for detecting coronary artery disease (CAD) provides better outcomes. PURPOSE: To compare the effect on clinical management and subsequent health effects of alternative diagnostic strategies for the initial assessment of suspected stable CAD. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized clinical trials comparing diagnostic strategies for CAD detection among patients with symptoms suggestive of stable CAD. DATA EXTRACTION: Three investigators independently extracted study data. DATA SYNTHESIS: The strongest available evidence was for 3 of the 6 comparisons: coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) versus invasive coronary angiography (ICA) (4 trials), CCTA versus exercise electrocardiography (ECG) (2 trials), and CCTA versus stress single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT-MPI) (5 trials). Compared with direct ICA referral, CCTA was associated with no difference in cardiovascular death and myocardial infarction (relative risk [RR], 0.84 [95% CI, 0.52 to 1.35]; low certainty) but less index ICA (RR, 0.23 [CI, 0.22 to 0.25]; high certainty) and index revascularization (RR, 0.71 [CI, 0.63 to 0.80]; moderate certainty). Moreover, CCTA was associated with a reduction in cardiovascular death and myocardial infarction compared with exercise ECG (RR, 0.66 [CI, 0.44 to 0.99]; moderate certainty) and SPECT-MPI (RR, 0.64 [CI, 0.45 to 0.90]; high certainty). However, CCTA was associated with more index revascularization (RR, 1.78 [CI, 1.33 to 2.38]; moderate certainty) but less downstream testing (RR, 0.56 [CI, 0.45 to 0.71]; very low certainty) than exercise ECG. Low-certainty evidence compared SPECT-MPI versus exercise ECG (2 trials), SPECT-MPI versus stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (1 trial), and stress echocardiography versus exercise ECG (1 trial). LIMITATION: Most comparisons primarily rely on a single study, many studies were underpowered to detect potential differences in direct health outcomes, and individual patient data were lacking. CONCLUSION: For the initial assessment of patients with suspected stable CAD, CCTA was associated with similar health effects to direct ICA referral, and with a health benefit compared with exercise ECG and SPECT-MPI. Further research is needed to better assess the relative performance of each diagnostic strategy. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: None. (PROSPERO: CRD42022329635).

An Overview of Cannabidiol as a Multifunctional Drug: Pharmacokinetics and Cellular Effects.

Cannabidiol (CBD), a non-psychoactive compound derived from Cannabis Sativa, has garnered increasing attention for its diverse therapeutic potential. This comprehensive review delves into the complex pharmacokinetics of CBD, including factors such as bioavailability, distribution, safety profile, and dosage recommendations, which contribute to the compound's pharmacological profile. CBD's role as a pharmacological inhibitor is explored, encompassing interactions with the endocannabinoid system and ion channels. The compound's anti-inflammatory effects, influencing the Interferon-beta and NF-κB, position it as a versatile candidate for immune system regulation and interventions in inflammatory processes. The historical context of Cannabis Sativa's use for recreational and medicinal purposes adds depth to the discussion, emphasizing CBD's emergence as a pivotal phytocannabinoid. As research continues, CBD's integration into clinical practice holds promise for revolutionizing treatment approaches and enhancing patient outcomes. The evolution in CBD research encourages ongoing exploration, offering the prospect of unlocking new therapeutic utility.

Comparison of Safety and Biological Efficacy of Anakinra (Kineret) Dispensed in Polycarbonate Plastic versus Borosilicate Glass Syringes: A Patient-Level Analysis of VCUART2 and VCUART3 Clinical Trials.

Anakinra is a recombinant human interleukin-1 receptor antagonist approved for the treatment of inflammatory diseases. Kineret is available as a solution prepared in a borosilicate glass syringe. For implementing a placebo-controlled double-blind randomized clinical trial, anakinra is commonly transferred into plastic syringes. However, there is limited data on anakinra's stability in polycarbonate syringes. We described the results of our previous studies on the use of anakinra in glass (VCUART3) versus plastic syringes (VCUART2) compared with placebo. These studies were conducted in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and we assessed the anti-inflammatory effects of anakinra versus placebo by comparing the area under the curve for high-sensitivity cardiac reactive protein (AUC-CRP) levels during the first 14 days of STEMI, its clinical effects on heart failure (HF) hospitalization, cardiovascular death, or new diagnosis of HF as well as adverse events profile between groups. The levels of AUC-CRP were 75 (50-255 mg·day/l) for anakinra in plastic syringes versus 255 (116-592 mg·day/l) in placebo and 60 (24-139 mg·day/l) and 86 (43-123 mg·day/l) for anakinra once and twice daily in glass syringes, respectively, compared with placebo 214 (131-394 mg·day/l). The rate of adverse events was also comparable between groups. There were no differences in the rate of HF hospitalization or cardiovascular death in patients who received anakinra in plastic or glass syringes. Fewer cases of new-onset heart failure occurred in patients receiving anakinra in plastic or glass syringes compared with placebo. Anakinra stored in plastic (polycarbonate) syringes provides comparable biologic and clinical effect to glass (borosilicate) syringes. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Anakinra (Kineret) 100 mg administered subcutaneously in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) for a duration of up to 14 days appears to have comparable safety and biological efficacy signals when delivered in prefilled glass or transferred into plastic polycarbonate syringes. This may have important implications for the feasibility of designing clinical trials in STEMI and other clinical conditions.

Clinical and Pharmacological Implications of Time to Treatment with Interleukin-1 Blockade in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Interleukin-1 (IL-1) blockade with anakinra given within 12 hours from reperfusion has been shown to reduce the inflammatory response as well as prevent heart failure (HF) events in patients with STEMI. We sought to determine whether time-to-treatment influences the efficacy of anakinra on systemic inflammation and incidence of HF events in patients with STEMI. We divided the cohort in two groups base6d on the median time from percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to investigational drug, and analyzed the effects of anakinra on the area-under-the-curve for C reactive protein (AUC-CRP) and on incidence of the composite endpoint of death or new onset HF. We analyzed data from 139 patients: 84 (60%) treated with anakinra and 55 (40%) with placebo. The median time from PCI to investigational treatment was 271 (182-391) minutes. The AUC-CRP was significantly higher in patients receiving placebo versus anakinra both in those with time from PCI to treatment <271 minutes (222.6 [103.9-325.2] vs. 78.4 [44.3-131.2], P < 0.001) and those with time from PCI to treatment ≥271 minute (235.2 [131.4-603.4] vs. 75.5 [38.9-171.9], P < 0.001) (P > 0.05 for interaction). Anakinra significantly reduced the combined endpoint of death or new onset HF in patients with time from PCI to treatment <271 minutes (5 [11%] vs. 9n[36%], log-rank χ 2 5.985, P = 0.014) as well as in patients with time from PCI to drug ≥271 minutes (2n[5%] vs. 7 [23%], log-rank χ 2 3.995, P = 0.046) (P > 0.05 for interaction). IL-1 blockade with anakinra blunts the acute systemic inflammatory response and prevents HF events independent of time-to-treatment. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: In patients with ST segment elevation presenting within 12 hours of pain onset and treated within 12 hours of reperfusion, interleukin-1 blockade with anakinra blunts the acute systemic inflammatory response, a surrogate of interleukin-1 activity, and prevents heart failure events independent of time-to-treatment.

Novel Pathophysiological, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Concepts in Acute and Recurrent Pericarditis.

Acute pericarditis is the most frequent pericardial disease characterized by inflammation of the pericardial layers resulting in pain, dyspnea and fatigue. Often limited to an isolated event, up to 30% of patients experience one or more recurrences. There is limited knowledge about the pathophysiology of this disease, possibly due to the limited availability of animal models. More recently, following seminal clinical trials with colchicine and interleukin-1 (IL-1) blockers and a novel murine model of acute pericarditis using zymosan A, it has become clear that the NLRP3 (NACHT, leucine-rich repeat, and pyrin domain-containing protein 3) inflammasome/IL-1 ß axis plays a central role in driving acute pericardial inflammation and in sustaining this process during recurrences. Diagnostic management of pericarditis has been implemented with multimodality imaging including echocardiography, cardiac computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance. These imaging modalities provide essential diagnostic and pathogenetic information, and are able to characterize pericardial inflammation, allowing to refine risk stratification and personalize treatment. Recent acquisitions yield relevant implications with regard to the therapeutic management of acute and recurrent pericarditis. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and colchicine are cornerstone therapies either for acute and recurrent pericarditis. However, the benefits of targeted agents, such as anakinra - a recombinant human IL-1 receptor antagonist - and rilonacept - an IL-1 α /IL-1 ß trap, are being increasingly recognized. To this end, phenotyping patients with pericarditis and addressing such therapies to those presenting with auto-inflammatory features (elevated C-reactive protein, sustained pericardial and systemic inflammation, multiple recurrences) is of utmost importance to identify patients who might be more likely to benefit from NLRP3 inflammasome/IL-1 ß pathway blockade.

Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome After COVID-19: A Systematic Review of Therapeutic Interventions.

ABSTRACT: Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) is a clinical syndrome of inappropriate increase in heart rate on standing that has been recently also associated with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) as part of the postacute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) or long-COVID. We herein aimed to systematically review reported cases of POTS after COVID-19 and determine the characteristics of the subjects, the diagnostic approach used, and the treatment strategies. We searched the literature according to the following criteria: (1) diagnosis of POTS according to standard definition; (2) timely association with a probable or definite diagnosis of COVID-19; and (3) a description of the individual subject(s). We identified 21 reports meeting criteria between March 2020 and September 2022, including 68 subjects (51 females and 17 males, 3:1 ratio) with a mean age of 34 ± 12 years, with reports deriving from the United States, Norway, Sweden, Israel, Ireland, United Kingdom, Singapore, and Japan. Most cases had mild COVID-19 symptoms. The most common POTS symptoms were palpitations, chest pain, lightheadedness, and debilitating fatigue. The diagnosis was established by means of head-up tilt table or active stand test. Nonpharmacologic treatments (fluids, sodium intake, and compression stockings) were virtually always used, but largely ineffective. Subjects received different treatments, the most common being beta-adrenergic blockers (ie, propranolol), mineral corticosteroids (ie, fludrocortisone), midodrine, and ivabradine. Symptoms tended to improve over time, but most patients remained symptomatic for several months. In conclusion, POTS after COVID-19 is a clinical condition affecting young individuals, and disproportionately young women, occurring as part of PASC-long-COVID, often debilitating, which can be easily diagnosed with a thorough clinical assessment and measuring changes in orthostatic heart rate and blood pressure. POTS after COVID-19 seems to be poorly responsive to nonpharmacological treatments but with symptoms improving with pharmacological interventions. Given the limited data available, additional research is urgently needed with respect to its epidemiology, pathophysiology, and treatments.

Interleukin-1 Inhibition for the Prevention and Treatment of Heart Failure.

ABSTRACT: Heart failure (HF) is a complex syndrome that remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Abundant evidence suggests inflammation plays a key role in the development and perpetuation of HF, but there are currently no anti-inflammatory treatments approved for use in HF. Interleukin-1 (IL-1), the prototypical pro-inflammatory cytokine, has been implicated in adverse cardiac remodeling and left ventricular dysfunction. Multiple early phase clinical trials using IL-1 blockade in patients at risk for or diagnosed with HF have suggested favorable safety and efficacy in reducing inflammatory biomarkers, as well as positive signals in surrogate and clinical endpoints. Additional large scale clinical trials are urgently needed to confirm the safety and efficacy of this therapeutic approach specifically in HF. In this narrative review, we discuss current evidence regarding IL-1 blockade in the prevention and treatment of HF.

Interleukin-1 blockers for the treatment of recurrent pericarditis: pathophysiology, patient reported outcomes and perspectives.

ABSTRACT: Recurrent pericarditis (RP) is the most troublesome complication of acute pericarditis reflecting an unresolving inflammation of the pericardial sac around the heart and associated with significant morbidity. Recent studies have shown interleukin-1 (IL-1) signaling to be central to the pathophysiology of cases of RP with evidence of activation of systemic inflammation. We herein review the literature and clinical trials discussing the utility of IL-1 blockade for RP. The early experience of IL-1 blockade with anakinra (Kineret) and its favorable safety profile paved the way for the clinical development of rilonacept (Arcalyst) and subsequent approval by the US FDA for RP. In patients with RP who have become colchicine-resistant and glucocorticoid-dependent, IL-1 blockade with rilonacept or anakinra effectively treats recurrences and prevents future flares, and significantly improves quality of life.

Anti-interleukin-1 agents for pericarditis: a primer for cardiologists.

Anti-interleukin (IL)-1 agents have been developed for the treatment of autoinflammatory and rheumatic conditions, where overproduction of IL-1 is an important pathophysiologic process. IL-1α and IL-1ß are the most studied members of the IL-1 family of cytokines and have the strongest proinflammatory effects. A naturally occurring antagonist (IL-1Ra) mitigates their proinflammatory effects. Overproduction of both IL-1α (released by inflamed/damaged pericardial cells) and IL-1ß (released by inflammatory cells) is now a well-recognized therapeutic target in patients with recurrent idiopathic pericarditis. Currently, there are three available anti-IL-1 agents: anakinra (recombinant human IL-1Ra), rilonacept (a soluble decoy receptor 'trap', binding both IL-1α and IL-1ß), and canakinumab (human monoclonal anti-IL-1ß antibody). For patients with corticosteroid-dependent and colchicine-resistant recurrent pericarditis with evidence of systemic inflammation, as evidenced by elevated C-reactive protein, the efficacy and safety of anakinra (2 mg/kg/day up to 100 mg/day subcutaneously usually for at least 6 months, then tapered) and rilonacept (320 mg subcutaneously for the first day followed by 160 mg subcutaneously weekly) have been clearly demonstrated in observational studies and randomized controlled clinical trials. Severe side effects are rare and discontinuation rates are very low (<4%). The most common reported side effect is injection site reactions (>50% of patients). In this article, we describe the historical and pathophysiological background and provide a comprehensive review of these agents, which appear to be the most significant advance in medical therapy of recurrent pericarditis in the last 5 years.

Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms of Action of Cannabidiol.

Cannabidiol (CBD) is the primary non-psychoactive chemical from Cannabis Sativa, a plant used for centuries for both recreational and medicinal purposes. CBD lacks the psychotropic effects of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC) and has shown great therapeutic potential. CBD exerts a wide spectrum of effects at a molecular, cellular, and organ level, affecting inflammation, oxidative damage, cell survival, pain, vasodilation, and excitability, among others, modifying many physiological and pathophysiological processes. There is evidence that CBD may be effective in treating several human disorders, like anxiety, chronic pain, psychiatric pathologies, cardiovascular diseases, and even cancer. Multiple cellular and pre-clinical studies using animal models of disease and several human trials have shown that CBD has an overall safe profile. In this review article, we summarize the pharmacokinetics data, the putative mechanisms of action of CBD, and the physiological effects reported in pre-clinical studies to give a comprehensive list of the findings and major effects attributed to this compound.

Select drug-drug interactions with colchicine and cardiovascular medications: A review.

Several randomized clinical trials have demonstrated the clinical utility of colchicine in the prevention and management of various cardiovascular conditions, including secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, acute and chronic pericarditis, and atrial fibrillation. As a result, it is reasonable to anticipate increased use of colchicine within the cardiovascular specialty. However, colchicine is metabolized by cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) and a substrate of the efflux transporter, P-glycoprotein (P-gp), creating the potential for clinically significant drug-drug interactions (DDIs). Therefore, when colchicine is administered concomitantly with other cardiovascular agents that inhibit CYP3A4 or P-gp, there is an increased risk of significant DDIs, potentially leading to negative sequelae. This article summarizes the evidence supporting the use of colchicine for cardiovascular disease, describes the mechanisms behind DDIs with select cardiovascular medications, and provides suggestions regarding colchicine dosing and management of DDIs to minimize the risk of poor tolerability and colchicine toxicity.