Age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off levels to rule out venous thromboembolism in patients with non-high pre-test probability: Clinical performance and cost-effectiveness analysis.

BACKGROUND: As aging was found to be associated with increased D-dimer levels, the question arose whether D-dimer measurement was useful in the diagnostic strategy of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in elderly patients. AIM OF THE STUDY: To compare retrospectively the performance of six diagnostic strategies based on the three-level Wells scores and various cut-off levels for D-dimer, evaluated using the HemosIL D-Dimer HS 500 assay, in a derivation cohort of 644 outpatients with non-high pretest probability (PTP) of VTE. The clinical usefulness of the best-performing strategy was then confirmed in a multicenter validation study involving 1255 consecutive outpatients with non-high PTP. RESULTS: The diagnostic strategy based on the age-adjusted cut-off level calculated by multiplying the patient's age by 10 above 50 years was found to perform the best in the derivation study with a better sensitivity-to-specificity ratio than the conventional strategy based on the fixed cut-off level (500 ng/ml), a higher specificity and a negative predictive value (NPV) above 99%. Such an increase in test specificity was confirmed in the validation cohort, with the NPV remaining above 99%. Taking into account the local reimbursement rates of diagnostic tests, using this strategy led to a 6.9% reduction of diagnostic costs for pulmonary embolism and a 5.1% reduction for deep vein thrombosis, as imaging tests would be avoided in a higher percentage of patients. CONCLUSION: The diagnostic strategy of VTE based on the age-adjusted cut-off level for D-dimer in patients over 50 years was found to be safe, with NPV above 99%, and cost-effective.

Monitoring treatments with unfractionated heparin: CTAD must be used instead of citrate as the anticoagulant solution when using partial-draw collection tubes. Results of a multicenter evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Sampling small volumes of blood may be necessary, particularly in pediatric patients, or in case of difficult or recurrent venipunctures. METHODS: Routine hemostasis test results evaluated in partial- and full-draw evacuated polymer tubes obtained in 4 centers were compared. RESULTS: No relevant discrepancy (Bland-Altman) was found between test results measured in partial- and full-draw tubes obtained from untreated patients and from patients on vitamin K-antagonist or low molecular weight heparin. In patients on unfractionated heparin (UFH), significantly lower anti-FXa activity [median=0.29IU/mL (range:0.04-1.15) vs. 0.39 (0.05-1.25), n=89, p<0.0001] and shorter aPTT were measured in partial-draw tubes. This discrepancy was likely to be related to the release of higher amounts of PF4 after increased platelet activation in partial-draw tubes. As CTAD is known to counteract platelet activation, we then collected blood into partial-draw CTAD tube and full-draw citrate tube. Both in patients on UFH and in untreated patients, no relevant difference could be demonstrated for all studied parameters (Bland-Altman), including aPTT and anti-FXa activity, even if analytical comparison showed significantly higher anti-FXa activity in partial-draw CTAD than in full-draw citrated tubes with a mean bias of 0.02 IU/mL, identical throughout the measuring range. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that samples collected into partial-draw citrate tubes allow accurate routine coagulation testingin all patients but those requiring UFH assessment,in which their use led to a significant underestimation ofanticoagulation. In such cases, partial-draw tubes containing CTAD could be validly used to monitor heparin therapy as well as to perform routine coagulation testing.