Investigating risk factors and treatment options for severe, partially steroid responsive, and steroid-refractory checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer care with incredible reductions in mortality. One of the most devastating complications of treatment is ICI-related pneumonitis (ICI-p). Despite this, little is known regarding risk factors for severe pneumonitis and treatment effectiveness of various therapeutic options for steroid-refractory disease. To address this, we conducted a retrospective study on patients with cancer who developed ICI-p. METHODS: We examined consecutive patients who received ICIs and developed ICI-p. Risk factors of interest for severe disease and steroid-refractory ICI-p, including pre-treatment pulmonary function tests (PFTs) and chest imaging, were compared between patients with severe (grades 3-5) and mild (grades 1-2) pneumonitis. The clinical and treatment courses for patients with steroid-refractory ICI-p were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 132 patients developed ICI-p, with 60 patients having mild and 72 with severe disease. We found that lower forced vital capacity percent predicted (66.24 vs 85.05, P = .05), lower total lung capacity percent predicted (85.23 vs 99.71, P = .13), and specific radiographic patterns on pre-treatment chest imaging were predictors of severe disease. Initial corticosteroid dose of less than 1 milligram per kilogram prednisone equivalent (P = .14) was correlated with partially steroid-responsive or steroid-refractory ICI-p. Ten patients had steroid refractory ICI-p, and those who received IVIG alone as the immune suppressant beyond corticosteroids had improved survival (P = 05). CONCLUSIONS: We are the first to identify pre-treatment PFTs and chest imaging abnormalities as risk factors for severe ICI-p. We also found that lower corticosteroid doses were associated with partially steroid-responsive and steroid-refractory ICI-p. Larger, prospective studies are needed to validate our results.

Novel endoscopic scoring system for immune mediated colitis: a multicenter retrospective study of 674 patients.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: No endoscopic scoring system has been established for immune-mediated colitis (IMC). This study aimed to establish such a system for IMC and explore its utility in guiding future selective immunosuppressive therapy (SIT) use compared to clinical symptoms. METHODS: This retrospective, international, 14-center study included 674 patients who developed IMC after immunotherapy and underwent endoscopic evaluation. Ten endoscopic features were selected by group consensus and assigned 1 point each to calculate an IMC endoscopic score (IMCES). IMCES cutoffs were chosen to maximize specificity for SIT use. This specificity was compared between IMCESs, and clinical symptoms were graded according to a standardized instrument. RESULTS: A total of 309 (45.8%) patients received SIT. IMCES specificity for SIT use was 82.8% with a cutoff of 4. The inclusion of ulceration as a mandatory criterion resulted in higher specificity (85.0% for a cutoff of 4). In comparison, the specificity of a Mayo endoscopic subscore of 3 was 74.6%, and the specificity of clinical symptom grading was much lower at 27.4% and 12.3%, respectively. Early endoscopy was associated with timely SIT use (P < .001; r = 0.4084). CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest multicenter study to devise an endoscopic scoring system to guide IMC management. An IMCES cutoff of 4 has a higher specificity for SIT use than clinical symptoms, supporting early endoscopic evaluation for IMC.

Endoscopy for the diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal bleeding caused by malignancy.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding secondary to malignancy can be challenging. Endoscopy is the gold standard to diagnose and treat gastrointestinal bleeding but clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with malignancy-related bleeding are not well understood. This study aims to look at clinical characteristics, endoscopic findings, safety and clinical outcomes of endoscopic interventions for GI malignancy-related bleeding. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed outcomes of patients with confirmed GI malignancies who underwent endoscopy for GI bleeding at MD Anderson Cancer Center between 2010 and 2019. Cox hazard analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with survival. RESULTS: A total of 313 patients were included, with median age of 59 years; 74.8% were male. The stomach (30.0%) was the most common tumor location. Active bleeding was evident endoscopically in 47.3% of patients. Most patients (77.3%) did not receive endoscopic treatment. Of the patients who received endoscopic treatment, 57.7% had hemostasis. No endoscopy-related adverse events were recorded. Endoscopic treatment was associated with hemostasis (P < 0.001), but not decreased recurrent bleeding or mortality. Absence of active bleeding on endoscopy, stable hemodynamic status at presentation, lower cancer stage, and surgical intervention were associated with improved survival. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that endoscopy is a safe diagnostic tool in this patient population; while endoscopic treatments may help achieve hemostasis, it may not decrease the risk of recurrent bleeding or improve survival.

Clinical Characteristics and Adverse Impact of Hepatotoxicity due to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

INTRODUCTION: We conducted this study to characterize the incidence, clinical features, treatment, and outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) hepatotoxicity. METHODS: Patients who received ICIs (with either single-agent or combination regimens) from January 1, 2010, to March 31, 2018, were identified. Hepatotoxicity was defined as alanine aminotransferase (ALT) >5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN), in the absence of an alternate cause, and categorized as grade 3 (ALT 5-20× ULN) or grade 4 (ALT >20× ULN), according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 4.03. RESULTS: Among 5,762 patients, 100 (2%) developed hepatotoxicity, occurring in a higher proportion of recipients of combination therapy (9.2%) compared with monotherapy (up to 1.7%, P < 0.001). ICIs were discontinued permanently in 69 and temporarily in 31 patients. Sixty-seven patients received steroids, 10 of whom (14%) had recurrent hepatotoxicity after the steroid taper. Thirty-one patients resumed ICIs after ALT improvement, 8 of whom (26%) developed recurrent hepatotoxicity. Characteristics of liver injury, response to steroids, and outcomes were similar between 38 individuals with and 62 without possible pre-existing liver disease. The severity and outcome of hepatotoxicity due to combination therapy were not significantly different from monotherapy. There were 36 deaths. Two had liver failure at the time of death, both with progression of liver metastases and grade 3 hepatotoxicity. DISCUSSION: Clinically significant ICI-related hepatotoxicity was uncommon but led to permanent ICI discontinuation in the majority. ICIs were restarted in a sizable proportion of patients, most of whom did not experience recurrent hepatotoxicity.

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors induced diarrhea and colitis: a review of incidence, pathogenesis and management.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Diarrhea and colitis are among the most commonly encountered immune-mediated adverse events among patients receiving antiprogrammed cell death protein/ligand-1 (PD-1/L1) as well as anticytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) antibodies. With growing indications and widespread use of immune checkpoint inhibitors, it is imperative to summarize the current body of evidence concerning the incidence, pathogenesis, risk factors, diagnostic challenges, and treatment options currently available for the management of immune-mediated diarrhea and colitis. Additionally, with emerging evidence analyzing the resumption of immune checkpoint inhibitors, it is pivotal to summarize our current understanding and future challenges. RECENT FINDINGS: Immune-mediated diarrhea and colitis can potentially be a viable surrogate marker for improved survival as it is validated further in large-scale studies. Early endoscopic evaluation can aid in the identification of patients at risk of developing steroid refractory immune-mediated colitis, and hence can be chosen to receive early add-on therapy with infliximab, vedolizumab or fecal microbiota transplantation, an emerging treatment option for immune-mediated diarrhea and colitis. Resuming immune checkpoint inhibitors carries a manageable risk of recurrent diarrhea and colitis, with most cases being mild and effectively managed with immunosuppressive therapy. SUMMARY: As our understanding of immune-mediated diarrhea and colitis grows, it is likely that this clinicopathologic entity will represent more than just an adverse event. With a growing number of treatment options, the management algorithms for immune-mediated diarrhea/colitis are likely to evolve in the future.

Association of Chronic Immune-Mediated Diarrhea and Colitis With Favorable Cancer Response.

BACKGROUND: Immune-mediated diarrhea and colitis (IMDC) is a common immune-related adverse effect related to immune checkpoint inhibitors. We aimed to identify risk factors for chronic IMDC and its prognostic value in cancer outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data on patients with a diagnosis of IMDC between January 2018 and October 2019 and grouped them based on disease duration into acute (≤3 months) and chronic (>3 months) categories. A logistic regression model and the Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank tests were used for biostatistical analysis. RESULTS: In our sample of 88 patients, 43 were in the chronic group and 45 were in the acute group. Genitourinary cancer and melanoma accounted for 70% of malignancies. PD-1/L1 monotherapy (52%) was the more frequently used regimen. We showed that chronic IMDC was associated with proton pump inhibitor use (odds ratio [OR], 3.96; P=.026), long duration of IMDC symptoms (OR, 1.05; P<.001) and hospitalization (OR, 1.07; P=.043), a histologic feature of chronic active colitis (OR, 4.8; P=.025) or microscopic colitis (OR, 5.0; P=.045), and delayed introduction of selective immunosuppressive therapy (infliximab/vedolizumab; OR, 1.06; P=.047). Chronic IMDC also reflected a better cancer response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (30% vs 51%; P=.002) and was accompanied by improved overall survival (P=.035). Similarly, higher doses of selective immunosuppressive therapy were associated with better overall survival (P=.018). CONCLUSIONS: Chronic IMDC can develop among patients with a more aggressive disease course and chronic features on colon histology. It likely reflects a prolonged immune checkpoint inhibitor effect and is associated with better cancer outcome and overall survival.

Neutropenic Enterocolitis: Clinical Features and Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing chemotherapy are at risk for mucosal injury and neutropenia, which facilitate colonic mucosal invasion by the bowel flora and subsequent neutropenic enterocolitis, which has a poor prognosis. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the clinical features and outcomes of neutropenic enterocolitis in patients at a comprehensive cancer center. DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study. SETTING: The study was conducted at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. PATIENTS: Neutropenic enterocolitis was defined by the presence of an absolute neutrophil count <1000/mm, compatible abdominal symptoms, and either mucosal thickening on abdominal imaging or mucosal injury on colon biopsy. Patients who had been diagnosed between 2010 and 2018 were included. MAIN OUTCOMES: Complication and survival rates were analyzed using logistic regression and Cox regression analyses, respectively. RESULTS: Of the 49,244 patients who had neutropenia during the study period, 134 (2.7%) were included. The median time from neutropenia onset to neutropenic enterocolitis was 2 days (interquartile range, 1-10 days). Neutropenic enterocolitis symptoms lasted for a median of 11 days (interquartile range, 6-22 days). Most patients received antibiotics (88%) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (68%). Complications included sepsis (11%), colonic perforation (2%), pneumatosis intestinalis (2%), and abscess formation (2%). The risks associated with complications included immunosuppressive therapy use within 1 month before neutropenic enterocolitis onset (OR, 3.92; 95% CI, 1.04-14.76) and delayed imaging (OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.03-1.17). Older age, severe neutropenia, prolonged neutropenia before and after neutropenic enterocolitis diagnosis, and other concomitant systemic infections were associated with lower survival rates. LIMITATIONS: The performance of this study at a single center and its retrospective nature are limitations of the study. CONCLUSION: The prompt diagnosis and management of neutropenic enterocolitis are critical to prevent complications. The use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor can be beneficial to shorten the duration of neutropenia. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B116. ENTEROCOLITIS NEUTROPÉNICA: CARACTERÍSTICAS CLÍNICAS Y RESULTADOS: Los pacientes sometidos a quimioterapia, están en riesgo de lesión de la mucosa y neutropenia, lo que facilita la invasión de la mucosa colónica por la flora intestinal y la subsecuente enterocolitis neutropénica, con un mal pronóstico.Evaluar las características clínicas y los resultados de la enterocolitis neutropénica de pacientes en un centro integral de cáncer.Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo.El estudio se realizó en el MD Anderson Cancer Center de la Universidad de Texas.Se definió la enterocolitis neutropénica, como la presencia de un recuento absoluto de neutrófilos <1000 / mm3, con síntomas compatibles abdominales y engrosamiento de la mucosa en imagen abdominal o lesión de la mucosa en biopsia de colon. Se incluyeron pacientes diagnosticados entre 2010 y 2018.Se analizaron las tasas de complicaciones y supervivencia mediante análisis de regresión logística y regresión de Cox.De 49,244 pacientes que tuvieron neutropenia durante el período de estudio, 134 (2.7%) fueron incluidos. La media del tiempo desde el inicio de la neutropenia hasta la enterocolitis neutropénica, fue de 2 días (RIC, 1-10 días). Los síntomas de enterocolitis neutropénica duraron una media de 11 días (RIC, 6-22 días). La mayoría de los pacientes recibieron antibióticos (88%) y factor estimulante de colonias de granulocitos (68%). Las complicaciones incluyeron sepsis (11%), perforación colónica (2%), neumatosis intestinal (2%) y formación de abscesos (2%). Los riesgos asociados con las complicaciones incluyeron, uso de terapia inmunosupresora dentro de 1 mes antes del inicio de la enterocolitis neutropénica (razón de probabilidades 3.92; intervalo de confianza del 95% 1.04-14.76) y demora en la obtención de imágenes (razón de probabilidades 1.10; intervalo de confianza del 95% 1.03-1.17), edad avanzada, neutropenia grave, neutropenia prolongada antes y después del diagnóstico de enterocolitis neutropénica y de otras infecciones sistémicas concomitantes, se asociaron con bajas tasas de supervivencia.Centro único y estudio retrospectivo.El rápidodiagnóstico y manejo de la enterocolitis neutropénica, es crítico para prevenir complicaciones. El uso del factor estimulante de colonias de granulocitos puede ser beneficioso para acortar la duración de la neutropenia. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B116.

Gut Microbiome and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Enterocolitis.

The gut microbiome is increasingly being described as one of the underlying mechanisms for development of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-induced colitis. Similarities in gut microbiome profiles have been found among various diseases associated with intestinal inflammation, including inflammatory bowel disease. Certain bacterial species have been reported to be preventive for colitis, as well as beneficial for cancer outcome, in patients receiving ICI therapy. Alternatively, other bacterial classes have been shown to be associated with immunologic alterations causing intestinal inflammation with subsequent increase in the risk of ICI-related colitis. Gut microbiome manipulation by fecal transplantation has been proposed as one of the modalities to ameliorate inflammation in patients with ICI-related colitis refractory to immunosuppressive therapy. Additional investigations are needed to clarify the role of gut microbiome in the pathogenesis of ICI-related colitis.

Gastrointestinal Tract Adverse Events.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown significant benefit in cancer patients. Their success, however, is associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which commonly affect the gastrointestinal tract, resulting in diarrhea and colitis. IrAEs range from mild self-limiting to severe life-threatening diseases and potentially limit the use of these medications. Diagnosis of ICI-induced enterocolitis is based on clinical symptoms, physical examination, stool tests, endoscopic and histologic evaluation, and/or imaging. Current management strategy is mainly anti-diarrheal agents for mild symptoms and immunosuppressants (e.g., corticosteroids, and infliximab or vedolizumab) for more severe diseases.

Hepatobiliary Adverse Events.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are increasingly used for multiple cancer types. Hepatotoxicity is a reported adverse event of ICI treatment. It can present as asymptomatic elevation of aspartate transaminase and alanine transaminase or symptomatic hepatitis with fever, malaise, and even death in rare cases. The diagnosis of ICI-induced hepatitis is made after exclusion of other etiologies based on medical history, laboratory evaluation, and imaging and histological findings. Treatment of ICI-induced hepatitis consists of ICI discontinuation and immunosuppression in severe cases. Pancreatic injury as asymptomatic lipase elevation or acute pancreatitis-like disease with abdominal pain and evidence on imaging has been documented as a toxicity of ICI therapy. Appropriate treatment of pancreatitis still needs further investigation. Few cases, reports, and series documented cholecystitis and cholangitis as possible adverse events related to ICI therapy as well.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced colitis as a predictor of survival in metastatic melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal (GI) immune-related adverse events (irAEs) commonly limit immune checkpoint inhibitors' (ICIs) treatment, which is very effective for metastatic melanoma. The independent impact of GI-irAEs on patients' survival is not well studied. We aimed to assess the impact of GI-irAEs on survival rates of patients with metastatic melanoma using multivariate model. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of patients with metastatic melanoma who developed GI-irAEs from 1/2010 through 4/2018. A number of randomized patients who did not have GI-irAEs were included as controls. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank test were used to estimate unadjusted survival durations. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate survival predictors; irAEs were included as time-dependent variables. RESULTS: A total of 346 patients were included, 173 patients had GI-irAEs; 124 (72%) received immunosuppression. In multivariate Cox regression, ECOG 2-3 (HR 2.57, 95%CI 1.44-4.57; P < 0.01), LDH ≥ 618 IU/L (HR 2.20, 95% CI 1.47-3.29; P < 0.01), stage M1c (HR 2.21, 95% CI 1.35-3.60; P < 0.01) were associated with worse OS rates. Any grade GI-irAEs (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.36-0.78; P < 0.01) was associated with improved OS rates. Immunosuppressive treatment did not affect OS (P = 0.15). High-grade diarrhea was associated with improved OS (P = 0.04). Patients who developed GI-irAEs had longer PFS durations on Cox model (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.41-0.76; P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: GI-irAEs are associated with improved OS and PFS in patients with metastatic melanoma. Furthermore, higher grades of diarrhea are associated with even better patients' OS rates.

Safety of endoscopy in cancer patients with thrombocytopenia and neutropenia.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Cancer patients are prone to thrombocytopenia and neutropenia, which increase the risk of bleeding and infection. We assessed the safety of endoscopic procedures in cancer patients with thrombocytopenia and/or neutropenia. METHODS: We studied consecutive cancer patients with thrombocytopenia and/or neutropenia who underwent endoscopic procedures from 2010 through 2015. Neutropenia was defined as an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) <1000 cells/µL, and thrombocytopenia as a platelet count <100 × 103/µL. Univariate and multivariate generalized estimating equation models were used to assess factors associated with risk of adverse events (AEs) or death. RESULTS: We identified 588 patients who underwent 783 procedures; 608 procedures were performed in the setting of thrombocytopenia and 675 procedures in the setting of neutropenia. Concurrent neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were recorded in 500 endoscopies. Twenty-four patients (4.1%) experienced infectious AEs, whereas 29 (4.9%) experienced bleeding AEs within 1 week of the procedure. On multivariate analysis, platelet count ≤50 × 103/µL was associated with risk of bleeding AEs. In contrast, poor performance status was associated with increased risk of infection AEs (P < .01). No association was observed between low ANC and infectious AEs. Poor performance status (P < .01) and platelet count ≤100 × 103/µL (P < .05) were associated with increased risk of 30-day mortality. A persistent platelet count <20 × 103/µL after the procedure, with a baseline platelet count of ≤20 × 103/µL before the procedure, was associated with significant risk of bleeding AEs compared with a platelet count >20 × 103/µL after the procedure (P < .01); furthermore, if the platelet count increased to >50 × 103/µL after the procedure, the bleeding risk after the procedure was greatly reduced (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic procedures are relatively safe in cancer patients with platelet count >50 × 103/µL. Nevertheless, a platelet count of ≥20 × 103/µL could be an appropriate threshold for platelet transfusion if 50 × 103/µL is difficult to achieve. The functional status of the patient, in the absence of the need for urgent or necessary endoscopic interventions, should be considered when deciding whether to perform endoscopy. The risk of procedure and the ANC did not seem to affect the outcomes.

Upper gastrointestinal symptoms and associated endoscopic and histological features in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated effectiveness in treating many malignancies. Gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events are commonly reported; however, few reports describe upper GI tract toxic effects. We aimed to describe clinical features of upper GI injury related to ICI. Methods: We studied consecutive patients who received ICIs between April 2011 and March 2018 and developed upper GI symptoms requiring esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). Results: Sixty patients developed upper GI symptoms between ICI initiation and 6 months after the last infusion. Among patients who had both EGD and colonoscopy (n = 38), 21 had endoscopic evidence of inflammation involving both the upper and lower GI tract. Overall, histological signs of inflammation of the stomach were evident in 83% of patients, but inflammation of the duodenum in 38%. Total of 42 patients had other risk factors of gastritis, i.e., chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Only isolated gastric inflammation was seen on endoscopy in patients without these risk factors. The rates of ulceration were similar in the cohorts with and without other risk factors for gastritis. Isolated upper GI inflammation was related to anti-PD-1/L1 in 47% of patients. Immunosuppressive therapy in our cohort with upper GI toxicity consisted of steroids (42%) and infliximab or vedolizumab (23%). Most isolated upper GI symptoms were treated with proton pump inhibitors (65%) or H2 blockers (35%). Conclusion: We observed a correlation between ICI use and onset of upper GI inflammation even when other risk factors were excluded. Gastric involvement was evident more often than duodenal involvement on endoscopic and histological level.

Clinical Review on the Utility of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Immunocompromised Patients.

Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) represents a promising management modality for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). In immunocompromised patients, FMT is utilized for CDI as well as emerging non-CDI indications such as inflammatory bowel disease and graft versus host disease. PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review aims to shed light on the safety and efficacy of FMT in immunocompromised patients, including patients suffering for human immunodeficiency virus infection, solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients, cancer patients, and patients on immunosuppressive therapies. RECENT FINDINGS: Though the body of evidence concerning the use of FMT in immunocompromised is growing, no clinical trials exist to date. Present literature weighs in favor of FMT in immunocompromised patients, with an acceptable adverse effect profile and minimal risk of infectious adverse events. Further large scale studies and randomized controlled trials to validate the utility of FMT in immunocompromised individuals will be a welcomed endeavor.

Patients with Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Are at Risk of Adenomatous Colon Polyps.

BACKGROUND: Patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) are frequently referred for colonoscopy to evaluate gastrointestinal symptoms during their treatment course. Here, we described the rate of colonic adenomas in patients with NHL. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients with NHL who underwent colonoscopy after being diagnosed with NHL between January 2000 and December 2017. RESULTS: Of the 17,938 patients who had been diagnosed with NHL in the study period, 2176 met the inclusion criteria. The mean age at the time of colonoscopy was 61 years. Most patients were male (61%). Overall, 1273 polyps were detected in 811 patients (37%). Sessile serrated adenomas were detected in 102 (5%) patients. The overall ADR was 12% in patients younger than 40 years of age (n = 103), 26% in patients aged 40-50 (n = 251), 34% in patients aged 51-60 (n = 630), and 43% in patients older than 60 (n = 1212). Most polyps were located in the right colon (63%), and 101 (8%) were larger than 1 cm. Villous adenomatous features were present in 1% of polyps, while high-grade dysplasia was detected in 22%. Invasive adenocarcinoma was identified in 4%. The median interval from lymphoma diagnosis to adenoma detection was 1.4 years (interquartile range 0.5-3.8 years). A repeat colonoscopy was performed in 343 patients. The overall ADR on repeat colonoscopy was 30%. Cox regression analysis revealed that age (hazards ratio 1.04; 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.05; P < 0.001) and male sex (hazards ratio 1.35; 95% confidence interval 1.13-1.60; P = 0.001) were independent factors associated with worse overall survival. By contrast, screening colonoscopy was associated with longer survival duration (hazards ratio 0.48; 95% confidence interval 0.36-0.63; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The ADR in NHL patients aged 40-50 years was equivalent to that reported in the literature in non-cancer patients aged 50-70 years. Early screening colonoscopy may be warranted in NHL patients younger than 50 years. Screening colonoscopy significantly improved the overall survival of patients with NHL.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors-Induced Colitis.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown significant benefit in cancer patients, but are associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs), that can affect the gastrointestinal tract resulting in diarrhea and colitis. IrAEs range from mild self-limiting to severe life-threatening disease, which potentially limit the use of these medications. Diagnosis of ICI-induced colitis is based on clinical symptoms, physical examination, stool tests, endoscopic evaluation, and/or imaging. Current management strategy is mainly anti-diarrheal agents for mild symptoms, and immunosuppressants (e.g., corticosteroids, and infliximab or vedolizumab) for more severe cases.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors-Induced Hepatitis.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been increasingly used for multiple cancer types in the past decade. ICIs include CTLA-4 inhibitors (e.g., ipilimumab) and the PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors (e.g., nivolumab and pembrolizumab). Hepatotoxicity is not uncommon secondary to ICI treatment. It can occur 8-12 weeks after the initiation of ICI and presents with elevation of aspartate transaminase and alanine transaminase. ICI-induced hepatitis is usually asymptomatic but may present with fever, malaise, and even death in rare cases. It is a diagnosis of exclusion after other etiologies are excluded based on medical history, laboratory evaluation, and imaging and histological findings. ICI-induced hepatitis might require discontinuation of ICI and/or treatment with immunosuppressants.

Clinical Features and Management of Acute and Chronic Radiation-Induced Colitis and Proctopathy.

BACKGROUND: RICAP is a recognized adverse effect of radiation therapy (RT) that can adversely affect cancer patients' quality of life. Data on the clinical characteristics and outcomes of RICAP are scarce. We aimed to analyze the clinical and endoscopic characteristics of acute or chronic radiation-induced colitis and proctopathy (ARICAP and CRICAP) based on symptom onset after RT (≤ or >45 days, respectively). METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study of a single tertiary cancer center, from January 2010 and December 2018, of cancer patients with endoscopically confirmed ARICAP and CRICAP. We conducted univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to associate clinical variables with endoscopic and medical outcomes. RESULTS: One hundred and twelve patients were included (84% Caucasian; 55% female; median age of 59 years); 46% had ARICAP with non-bloody diarrhea as the predominant symptom, whereas 55% had CRICAP with mostly bloody diarrhea. Neovascularization was the most frequent finding on endoscopy, followed by bleeding. ARICAP patients more often received medical management (p < 0.001), whereas CRICAP patients with bleeding more often received argon plasma coagulation (APC) (p = 0.002). Female sex and undergoing less-intense RT treatments were more associated with medical treatment; bleeding clinically and during the endoscopy was more associated with APC treatment. However, APC treatment did not significantly reduce bleeding recurrence or RICAP symptoms. CONCLUSION: Patients with ARICAP and CRICAP experience different symptoms. Medical management should be considered before endoscopic therapy. APC may be useful in patients with endoscopically apparent bleeding.

Concurrent immune checkpoint inhibition and selective immunosuppressive therapy in patients with immune-related enterocolitis.

PURPOSE: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy is often suspended because of immune-related enterocolitis (irEC). We examined the effect of resumption of ICIs with or without concurrent selective immunosuppressive therapy (SIT) on rates of symptom recurrence and survival outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective, multicenter study examined patients who were treated with ICI and developed irEC requiring SIT (infliximab or vedolizumab) for initial symptom control or to facilitate steroid tapering between May 2015 and June 2020. After symptom resolution, patients were restarted either on ICI alone or on concurrent ICI and SIT at the discretion of the treating physicians. The associations between irEC recurrence and treatment group were assessed via univariate analyses and multivariate logistic regression. Cox proportional hazards model was used for survival analysis. RESULTS: Of the 138 included patients who required SIT for initial irEC symptom control, 61 (44.2%) patients resumed ICI without concurrent SIT (control group) and 77 (55.8%) patients resumed ICI therapy with concurrent SIT: 33 with infliximab and 44 with vedolizumab. After symptom resolution, patients in the control group were more commonly restarted on a different ICI regimen (65.6%) compared with those receiving SIT (31.2%) (p<0.001). The total number of ICI doses administered after irEC resolution and ICI resumption was similar in both groups (four to five doses). Recurrence of severe colitis or diarrhea after ICI resumption was seen in 34.4% of controls compared with 20.8% of patients receiving concurrent SIT. Concurrent SIT was associated with reduced risk of severe irEC recurrence after ICI resumption in a multivariate logistic regression model (OR 0.34; 95% CI 0.13 to 0.92; p=0.034). There was no difference in survival outcomes between patients in the control group and patients concurrently treated with SIT. CONCLUSION: After resolution of irEC symptoms, reinitiation of ICI with concurrent SIT is safe, reduces severe irEC recurrence, and has no negative impact on survival outcomes.

Microbiome alteration via fecal microbiota transplantation is effective for refractory immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced colitis.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) target advanced malignancies with high efficacy but also predispose patients to immune-related adverse events like immune-mediated colitis (IMC). Given the association between gut bacteria with response to ICI therapy and subsequent IMC, fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) represents a feasible way to manipulate microbial composition in patients, with a potential benefit for IMC. Here, we present a large case series of 12 patients with refractory IMC who underwent FMT from healthy donors as salvage therapy. All 12 patients had grade 3 or 4 ICI-related diarrhea or colitis that failed to respond to standard first-line (corticosteroids) and second-line immunosuppression (infliximab or vedolizumab). Ten patients (83%) achieved symptom improvement after FMT, and three patients (25%) required repeat FMT, two of whom had no subsequent response. At the end of the study, 92% achieved IMC clinical remission. 16S rRNA sequencing of patient stool samples revealed that compositional differences between FMT donors and patients with IMC before FMT were associated with a complete response after FMT. Comparison of pre- and post-FMT stool samples in patients with complete responses showed significant increases in alpha diversity and increases in the abundances of Collinsella and Bifidobacterium, which were depleted in FMT responders before FMT. Histologically evaluable complete response patients also had decreases in select immune cells , including CD8+ T cells, in the colon after FMT when compared with non-complete response patients (n = 4). This study validates FMT as an effective treatment strategy for IMC and gives insights into the microbial signatures that may play a critical role in FMT response.