Weekday Surgery Associated With Short-Term Outcomes in Patients With Colorectal Cancers.

INTRODUCTION: The "weekday effect" on elective surgery remains controversial. We aimed to examine the association between the day of surgery and short-term outcomes after elective surgery for stage I-III colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: We performed a multicenter retrospective analysis of 2574 patients who underwent primary colorectal resection for CRC between January 2017 and December 2019 at 15 institutions belonging to the Hiroshima Surgical Study Group of Clinical Oncology. Patients were divided into two groups according to the day of surgery: Friday and non-Friday (Monday to Thursday). After propensity score matching (PSM), we compared 30-day mortality and postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: Out of the total, 368 patients underwent surgery on Fridays, and the remaining 2206 underwent surgery on non-Fridays. The overall mortality rate was 0.04% (n = 1). In 1685 patients with colon cancer, the proportion of American Society of Anesthesiologists scores was significantly lower in the Friday group than in the non-Friday group before PSM. After PSM of patient, tumor, and operative characteristics, operative time was slightly more prolonged and blood loss was slightly greater in the Friday group; however, these differences were not clinically meaningful. In the 889 patients with rectal cancer, the proportion of patients with abnormal respiratory patterns was significantly lower in the Friday group than in the non-Friday group before PSM. After PSM, the Friday group had a higher incidence of morbidity (≥ Clavien-Dindo 3a), higher incidence of digestive complications, and prolonged postoperative hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: The results may be useful in determining the day of the week for CRC surgery, which requires more advanced techniques and higher skills.

Survival outcomes of patients with stage III colorectal cancer aged ≥ 80 years who underwent curative resection: the HiSCO-04 prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly patients aged ≥ 80 years with stage III colorectal cancer remains unclear. In parallel with a multicenter prospective phase II trial evaluating the efficacy of uracil-tegafur and leucovorin as adjuvant chemotherapy (HiSCO-03), we conducted a prospective observational study of these patients to assess survival outcomes, including those ineligible for chemotherapy. METHODS: This multi-institutional prospective cohort study included 17 institutions in Hiroshima, Japan. Patients aged ≥ 80 years with stage III colorectal cancer who underwent curative resection were enrolled. The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival, and the secondary endpoints were 3-year overall and relapse-free survival. Propensity score matching was used to assess the effects of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 214 patients were analyzed between 2013 and 2018, including 99 males and 115 females with a median age of 84 years (range 80-101 years). Recurrence occurred in 58 patients and secondary cancers were observed in 17. The 3-year disease-free, overall, and relapse-free survival rates were 63.3%, 76.9%, and 62.9%, respectively. Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 65 patients with a completion rate of 52%. In a study of 80 patients that adjusted for background factors using propensity score matching, patients who completed the planned treatment showed improved disease-free survival (3-year disease-free survival: completed, 80.0%; not received, 65.5%; and discontinued, 56.3%; p = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: Completion of adjuvant chemotherapy may improve the prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer aged ≥ 80 years, although the number of patients who would benefit from it is limited.

Association between social background and implementation of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for older patients undergoing curative resection of colorectal cancers, sub-analysis of the HiSCO-04 study.

PURPOSE: Adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended following colorectal cancer resection based on risk of recurrence. In older patients, treatment decisions should consider recurrence rates and tolerability, as well as functional prognosis, residual disease, and social factors. This study aims to investigate factors, including social background, influencing implementation of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in older patients undergoing curative resection for colorectal cancer. METHODS: This multi-institutional prospective cohort study included 15 institutions belonging to the Hiroshima Surgical study group for Clinical Oncology. We analyzed 159 older patients aged ≥ 80 years, who underwent curative resection for stage III colorectal cancer between December 2013 and June 2018, as sub-analysis of the HiSCO-04 study. RESULTS: In total, 62 (39.0%) patients underwent postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. Four factors were significantly associated with its implementation: performance status < 2, Charlson Comorbidity Index < 2, prognostic nutritional index ≥ 40, and presence of a spouse or siblings as lifestyle supporters. No significant difference was found in the backgrounds between complete and incomplete postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy patients. CONCLUSION: Performance status, Charlson Comorbidity Index, nutritional status, and presence of a spouse or siblings as lifestyle supporters are possible factors influencing the implementation of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in older patients. To select appropriate treatment options, including postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, it is essential to consider physical condition and comorbidities of older patients, thoroughly explain the situation to their families, and establish a support system to enhance understanding of the available treatment options.

Prostaglandin E-major urinary metabolites as a new biomarker for acute mesenteric ischemia.

BACKGROUND: Acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) is an emergent vascular disease caused by cessation of the blood supply to the small intestine. Despite advances in the diagnosis, intervention, and surgical procedures, AMI remains a life-threatening condition. Prostaglandin E2 major urinary metabolite (PGE-MUM), the urinary metabolite of prostaglandin E2, is known to be stable in urine and has been suggested to be a valuable biomarker for intestinal mucosal inflammation, such as ulcerative colitis. We therefore investigated whether or not PGE-MUM levels reflect the degree of ischemia in an intestinal ischemia-reperfusion model. METHODS: Male rats were used to establish a superior mesenteric artery occlusion (SMAO) group, in which the superior mesenteric artery was clamped, and a sham group. The clamping times in the SMAO group were either 30 minutes or 60 minutes, and reperfusion times were either 3 hours or 6 hours, after which PGE-MUM values were measured. RESULTS: The histological injury score of the SMAO (30-minute ischemia and 6-hour reperfusion group, 1.8 ± 0.4; 60-minute ischemia and 6-hour reperfusion group, 4.7 ± 0.5) and were significantly greater than that of the sham group (0.4 ± 0.7, p < 0.05). The PGE-MUM levels in the SMAO group (30-minutes ischemia and 6-hour reperfusion group, 483 ± 256; 60-minutes ischemia and 6-hour reperfusion group, 889 ± 402 ng/mL) were significantly higher than in the sham group (30-minute and 6-hour observation group, 51 ± 20; 60-minute and 6-hour observation group, 73 ± 32 ng/mL; p < 0.05). Furthermore, the PGE-MUM value was corrected by the concentration of urinary creatinine (Cr). The PGE-MUM/urinary Cr levels in the SMAO group were also significantly higher than in the sham group ( p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: We found that intestinal ischemia-reperfusion increased urinary PGE-MUM levels depending on the ischemic time. This suggests the potential utility of PGE-MUM as a noninvasive marker of intestinal ischemia.

Clinical Phase I Study of TAS102/Irinotecan/Bevacizumab Combination Therapy in Japanese Patients With Unresectable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC).

BACKGROUND: In this phase I study, we aimed to examine the safety of a triple combination (TAS-102/irinotecan/bevacizumab) therapy in patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). METHODS: In the TAS-102 dose-escalation phase, we determined dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), estimated the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and determined the recommended dose (RD); in the expansion phase, we evaluated safety. The RD was administered in advance for 10 patients. The TAS-102 dose was increased to 25-35 mg/m2 and administered orally twice on days 1-5 and 8-12. Irinotecan (100 mg/m2) and bevacizumab (5 mg/m2) were administered on days 1 and 15 of the treatment, respectively. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were enrolled in dose-escalation Levels 1-3, and ten in the expansion phase. A 30 mg/m2 TAS-102 dose at Level 2 was administered to three patients, with one presenting grade 4 neutropenia. A 35 mg/m2 TAS-102 dose at Level 3 was administered to five patients, with three patients presenting grade 4 neutropenia and grade 3 DLTs. We added three patients at Level 2 and set the MTD at 30 mg/m2, with no DLTs. The RD was fixed at 25 mg/m2, with no DLTs (N = 10) or treatment-related deaths. One patient showed complete response at Level 2, four presented partial response, and eleven individuals maintained stable disease for over four months. The median progression-free survival duration was 7.6 months, while the median overall survival period was 16.9 months. CONCLUSION: The TAS-102/irinotecan/bevacizumab combination therapy was safe, effective, and well-tolerated in patients previously treated with mCRC.