Living with the Elekta Compact: Limitations and ways around them.

Elekta AB, Sweden has recently propagated the Elekta Compact--a low-cost, small-footprint, single energy (6MV), linear accelerator, in India. The absence of electron beams and the inability to seamlessly deliver inverse planned intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) segments, mean that some out-of-the-box thinking is mandatory for the full range of required treatments in different clinical settings, but is ultimately very rewarding. Our department started off in July 2011, with the Elekta Compact, equipped with MLCi2 and a camera-based electron portal imaging device. For head-neck cancers, we have successfully utilized a 3D conformal class-solution of eight-to-nine oblique beams, with multiple segments, to deliver an adequate dose to the posterior neck, respecting spinal cord tolerance. Parotid gland sparing is possible in selected node-negative hypopharyngeal/laryngeal cancers. For prostate cancers, we have developed a forward-planned IMRT protocol to routinely deliver 76-80 Gy to the prostate, with margins, while conforming to the same rectal dose-volume constraints as in inverse IMRT. Response and tolerance have been excellent so far. In head-neck cancers, the majority (71%) of patients was locally advanced; however, complete response was achieved in 75% of the cases. Grade 3 acute toxicities were seen in only 7% of the cases and compliance overall was excellent, with no patients requiring a gap in treatment. We achieved biochemical control in 100% of the prostate cancer patients; no patients had grade 3 acute toxicities, and with a median follow-up of 12 months, have yet to see any late rectal bleeding. Although engineered for simplicity and versatility, the Compact requires some innovative thinking by clinicians/physicists to optimize the full range of its possibilities. However, upgrades like inverse IMRT delivery, which are in the pipeline, are urgently needed for it to be viable, especially in a single-accelerator department.

Awareness of palliative care among doctors of various departments in all four teaching medical colleges in a metropolitan city in Eastern India: A survey.

OBJECTIVE: To enquire about the level of awareness regarding various important aspects of palliative medicine among doctors of various departments in four Medical Colleges in Kolkata through a questionnaire. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A questionnaire was developed by few members of Indian Association of Palliative Care. It was distributed, to a convenience sample of doctors who worked at various departments in all four teaching hospitals in Kolkata. The distribution and collection of questionnaires was carried out within four months. RESULTS: The results suggested that 85% of the doctors felt that cancer was the commonest reason for the palliative care teams to be involved. Seventy four percent of the doctors mentioned that pain control was their prime job; 53% said that they are enjoying their encounter with palliative care, so far; 77% of the doctors thought breaking bad news is necessary in further decision making process; only 22% of the doctors reported the WHO ladder of pain control sequentially, 35% of the doctors believed other forms of therapies are useful in relieving pain, 35% of the doctors thought that they gave enough importance and time for pain control; 77% said that they had heard about a hospice, among them still 61% of the doctors thought that the patients should spend last days of their life at home. Thinking of the future, 92% of the doctors think that more and more people will need palliative care in the coming days. CONCLUSION: Amongst the doctors of various departments, there is a lack of training and awareness in palliative care. Almost all the doctors are interested and they are willing to have more training in pain control, breaking bad news, communication skills and terminal care.