RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Elevated aminotransferase levels indicating liver function, even in the normal range, have attracted great concern as potential novel markers of cardiovascular risk assessment. We hypothesized the possibility that liver function test variations in the normal range might be meaningfully associated to coronary artery disease (CAD). METHOD: Eighty-eight patients were randomly selected from those who underwent coronary angiography from June 2010 to June 2011 after applying to the outpatient cardiology clinic in Gulhane Military Medical Academy. According to the results of angiographies, patients were classified into three groups as normal, non-critical (< 50% involvement in coronaries), and critical (≥ 50% involvement in coronaries). In addition to angiographic intervention, measurements of serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) concentrations, albumin and the other serum parameters were performed in all patients. RESULTS: The patient groups of CAD were balanced (28 critical cases, 30 non-critical cases and 30 normal cases). Mean age was 51.93 ± 9.3 (range 32-65) years and 19.3 per cent (n = 17) were females. Multiple linear regression analysis of all three liver function tests explained a significant portion of the variance, but adjusted r-squares were small (AST = 0.174, ALT = 0.242, albumin = 0.124). Albumin was significantly higher for patients with critical CAD than for patients with no CAD (beta = 3.205, p = 0.002). Non-critical CAD was not significantly different from no CAD for any of the dependent variables. Mean AST was significantly higher for patients taking aspirin (beta = 0.218, p = 0.049), as was mean ALT (beta = 0.264, p = 0.015). CONCLUSION: Alanine aminotransferase and AST may not be associated with angiographically determined coronary atherosclerosis. Albumin may be more sensitive to demonstrate the burden of atherosclerosis. These results indicate that the association between the liver function tests and coronary atherosclerosis may be more complex than generally appreciated.
RESUMO
Ketanserin, a serotonin receptor antagonist (S2), lowered blood pressure in patients with essential hypertension; at three months 72% (13/18) had a successful reduction in pressure. No marked orthostatic changes were noted. Older patients responded better when standing. Compared with metoprolol, ketanserin provided no significant difference in response at three months. With ketanserin, the heart rate was reduced only in the supine position, whereas it was reduced in the supine and standing positions with metoprolol. Response to ketanserin could not be predicted from baseline renin, aldosterone, or cortisol levels in blood, nor were there any changes in these factors or in plasma hydroxyindole levels with therapy. Ketanserin was generally well tolerated. Cholesterol values were significantly reduced with ketanserin, and there were no adverse hematologic or biochemical changes. Ketanserin should have a significant role in managing hypertension.
Assuntos
Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Ketanserina/uso terapêutico , Metoprolol/uso terapêutico , Pressão Sanguínea/efeitos dos fármacos , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Feminino , Frequência Cardíaca/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Postura , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
The purpose of this study was to compare the psychotropic prescribing practices of family physicians and psychiatric physicians, and to assess their satisfaction with education about psychotropic prescribing. A survey was mailed to 461 active members of the Minnesota Psychiatric Society and to a randomized sample of 461 active members of the Minnesota Academy of Family Physicians. Major depression, panic disorder, and dementia with behavioral disturbance were selected for study. For each disorder, we asked for the estimated number of patients seen and treated as well as a list in order of preference of the three medications they most commonly use. Those surveyed were also asked about their level of satisfaction with the training they received in medical school, residency, and continuing medical education (CME) courses on the topic of psychotropic prescribing. The two physician groups reported similar prescribing practices for the single-drug treatment of depression. Family physicians more frequently prescribed minor tranquilizers and older generation psychotropics than did psychiatrists when treating panic disorder and dementia with behavioral disturbance. Patients with depression were the least likely to be referred to other health professionals. Neither physician group was satisfied with medical school education in this area; family physicians were less satisfied with residency training and in related CME courses than were psychiatric physicians. Additional study is needed to better understand interspecialty practice variation for commonly encountered psychiatric disorders. Medical education programs at all levels could better meet the reported needs of their graduates by providing more attention to prescribing psychotropic agents.
Assuntos
Medicina de Família e Comunidade/educação , Medicina de Família e Comunidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Psiquiatria/educação , Psiquiatria/estatística & dados numéricos , Psicotrópicos/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Criança , Demência/tratamento farmacológico , Transtorno Depressivo/tratamento farmacológico , Uso de Medicamentos , Educação Médica Continuada , Feminino , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Minnesota , Avaliação das Necessidades , Transtorno de Pânico/tratamento farmacológico , Satisfação Pessoal , Médicos/psicologia , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
Whether preparticipation sports examinations are necessary and what they should include are matters of debate, especially in the young because of the low yield of new medical diagnoses. The goal of the examining physician is to determine whether the athlete is mentally, developmentally, and physically capable of safely competing in recreational and competitive sports. We recommend that examinations precede the start of an activity by 4 to 6 weeks and be done every 3 years. History taking should include parental input and a private interview with the athlete when possible. The specific areas of the body to be used in a particular sport should be emphasized in the physical examination, and the amount of contact and energy required should be considered. Abnormal findings should be thoroughly evaluated to rule out risk of injury or sudden death before approval to participate is granted.
Assuntos
Anamnese , Exame Físico/métodos , Medicina Esportiva , Adolescente , Criança , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Medição de Risco , Maturidade SexualRESUMO
In the absence of a definitive diagnostic test for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, physicians should use the DSM-IV, various standardized assessment instruments, and data from parents, teachers, and others to guide them in making an accurate assessment of children suspected of having the disorder. Treatment frequently includes drugs and behavioral therapies, with positive results.
Assuntos
Transtorno do Deficit de Atenção com Hiperatividade/diagnóstico , Transtorno do Deficit de Atenção com Hiperatividade/tratamento farmacológico , Terapia Comportamental , Estimulantes do Sistema Nervoso Central/uso terapêutico , Criança , Terapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Determinação da Personalidade , Escalas de Graduação PsiquiátricaAssuntos
Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/tendências , Medicina de Família e Comunidade/educação , Internato e Residência/tendências , Psiquiatria/educação , Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente , Medicina de Família e Comunidade/tendências , Humanos , Internato e Residência/organização & administração , Relações Interprofissionais , Minnesota , Psiquiatria/tendências , Saúde da População Rural , Estados UnidosRESUMO
The American Urological Association (AUA) convened the Best Practice Policy Panel on Asymptomatic Microscopic Hematuria to formulate policy statements and recommendations for the evaluation of asymptomatic microhematuria in adults. The recommended definition of microscopic hematuria is three or more red blood cells per high-power microscopic field in urinary sediment from two of three properly collected urinalysis specimens. This definition accounts for some degree of hematuria in normal patients, as well as the intermittent nature of hematuria in patients with urologic malignancies. Asymptomatic microscopic hematuria has causes ranging from minor findings that do not require treatment to highly significant, life-threatening lesions. Therefore, the AUA recommends that an appropriate renal or urologic evaluation be performed in all patients with asymptomatic microscopic hematuria who are at risk for urologic disease or primary renal disease. At this time, there is no consensus on when to test for microscopic hematuria in the primary care setting, and screening is not addressed in this report. However, the AUA report suggests that the patient's history and physical examination should help the physician decide whether testing is appropriate.