Involving the community in cervical cancer prevention programs.

Underutilization of cervical cancer prevention services by women in the high-risk age group of 30-60 years can be attributed to health service factors (such as poor availability, poor accessibility, and poor quality of care provided), to women's lack of information, and to cultural and behavioral barriers. The Alliance for Cervical Cancer Prevention (ACCP) partners have been working to identify effective ways to increase women's voluntary participation in prevention programs by testing strategies of community involvement in developing countries. The ACCP experiences include developing community partnerships to listen to and learn from the community, thereby enhancing appropriateness of services; developing culturally appropriate messages and educational materials; making access to high-quality screening services easier; and identifying effective ways to encourage women and their partners to complete diagnosis and treatment regimens. Cervical cancer prevention programs that use these strategies are more likely to increase demand, ensure follow-through for treatment, and ultimately reduce disease burden.

Advocating for cervical cancer prevention.

Cervical cancer is a significant health problem among women in developing countries. Contributing to the cervical cancer health burden in many countries is a lack of understanding and political will to address the problem. Broad-based advocacy efforts that draw on research and program findings from developing-country settings are key to gaining program and policy support, as are cost-effectiveness analyses based on these findings. The Alliance for Cervical Cancer Prevention (ACCP) has undertaken advocacy efforts at the international, regional, national, and local levels to raise awareness and understanding of the problem (and workable solutions), galvanize funders and governments to take action, and engage local stakeholders in ensuring program success. ACCP experience demonstrates the role that evidence-based advocacy efforts play in the ultimate success of cervical cancer prevention programs, particularly when new screening and treatment approaches-and, ultimately, radically new approaches such as a human papillomavirus vaccine-are available.

Perceived barriers and benefits to cervical cancer screening in Latin America.

BACKGROUND: This article describes the results of studies on the barriers and benefits of cervical cancer screening from the perspective of women, men, and health providers in five Latin American countries and compares them to other findings from the literature. METHODS: Five separate qualitative studies (focus groups and interviews) were conducted among low-income women in Venezuela, Ecuador, Mexico, El Salvador, and Peru regarding barriers and benefits of cervical cancer screening. Views from health providers and men were also included. RESULTS: The main barriers identified by all participants are accessibility and availability of quality services, facilities that lack comfort and privacy, costs, and courtesy of providers, which interact with poor service delivery. Barriers that pertain to women's beliefs are anxiety borne by women awaiting test results, associated with negligence and fear of cancer (although not to a particular cancer or a particular procedure). Benefits of screening are peace of mind and being in control of their health, which then enable other life activities to continue unhindered. CONCLUSIONS: Except for the accessibility and availability of quality services, these results are consistent with findings from other studies in developed and developing countries. Barriers could be lifted if health service delivery was enhanced, for instance, through quality improvement techniques that are available at low cost. Women's anxiety over test results still needs to be further assessed to devise risk communication strategies that take into account broader cultural frameworks. It is to be noted that such strategies should permeate the way health services are provided for cervical cancer prevention regardless of the specific test used. Vulnerability perceived by low-income women with respect to their capacity to cope with diseases and trust the health services and how this affects their perceptions of risk and their behaviors have not been studied as yet.