RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To examine differences in opioid use, length of stay, and adverse events after minimally invasive correction of pectus excavatum (MIRPE) with and without intercostal nerve cryoablation. BACKGROUND: Small studies show that intraoperative intercostal nerve cryoablation provides effective analgesia with no large-scale evaluations of this technique. METHODS: The pediatric health information system database was used to perform a retrospective cohort study comparing patients undergoing MIRPE at children's hospitals before and after the initiation of cryoablation. The association of cryoablation use with inpatient opioid use was determined using quantile regression with robust standard errors. Difference in risk-adjusted length of stay between the cohorts was estimated using negative binomial regression. Odds of adverse events between the two cohorts were compared using logistic regression with a generalized estimating equation. RESULTS: A total of 5442 patients underwent MIRPE at 44 children's hospitals between 2016 and 2022 with 1592 patients treated after cryoablation was introduced at their hospital. Cryoablation use was associated with a median decrease of 80.8 (95% CI: 68.6-93.0) total oral morphine equivalents as well as a decrease in estimated median length of stay from 3.5 [3.2-3.9] days to 2.5 [2.2-2.9] days ( P value: 0.016). Cryoablation use was not significantly associated with an increase in any studied adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Introduction of cryoablation for perioperative analgesia was associated with decreased inpatient opioid use and length of stay in a large sample with no change in adverse events. This novel modality for perioperative analgesia offers a promising alternative to traditional pain management in thoracic surgery.
Assuntos
Criocirurgia , Tórax em Funil , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides , Humanos , Criança , Criocirurgia/efeitos adversos , Criocirurgia/métodos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Tempo de Internação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Dor Pós-Operatória/terapia , Tórax em Funil/cirurgia , Nervos Intercostais/cirurgia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/etiologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodosRESUMO
The Syrian conflict has forced over a million refugees into Lebanon, which now faces the challenge of providing healthcare for this large, vulnerable population. Syrian refugees and Lebanese citizens suffer from an immense burden of cancer and encounter many barriers to obtaining healthcare. An increase in cancer awareness could prompt earlier diagnosis and treatment. This study aims to evaluate the level of cancer awareness and barriers to medical treatment among Syrian refugees and Lebanese citizens in Lebanon. A descriptive cross-sectional survey design was used. Four hundred seventeen Syrian refugees and 319 Lebanese citizens seeking healthcare in Lebanon completed the Cancer Awareness Measure. The mean age of Syrian refugees and Lebanese citizens was 33.8 years (SD 11.9) and 41.7 years (SD 16.3), respectively. Syrian refugees and Lebanese citizens were only able to recognize a low number of cancer symptoms (mean 4.2 (out of 9), SD 2.4 and 3.9, SD 2.3, respectively) and risk factors (mean 5.1 (out of 11), SD 2.6 and 5.2, SD 2.9, respectively). Barriers to seeking medical care were prevalent. The most commonly reported barrier among both samples was having no medical insurance or funds to cover the cost of treatment (78.9% and 67.7%, respectively). A comprehensive restructuring of the Lebanese healthcare system and a massive influx of resources are required for Syrian refugees and Lebanese citizens to obtain adequate access to cancer treatment. To encourage early diagnosis and treatment, much more work is needed to overcome barriers and enhance knowledge of cancer.
Assuntos
Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/terapia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Refugiados/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Líbano/epidemiologia , Masculino , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Inquéritos e Questionários , Síria/etnologiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: Intraoperative intercostal nerve cryoablation has emerged as a promising modality for postoperative analgesia following Surgical Correction of Pectus Excavatum (SCOPE). Most centers use two-minute cryoablation per level, although data from histologic and adult studies suggest the effectiveness of one-minute freezes. We aimed to describe our center's experience with one minute per level cryoablation. METHODS: A retrospective single institution review of patients undergoing SCOPE was performed to compare patients pre- and post-intercostal nerve cryoablation implementation. Cryoablation was performed as one minute for each of the thoracic intercostal nerves T3-T7. Multivariable regression analyses were conducted to compare the outcomes and cost between pre- and post-implementation groups. RESULTS: During the study period, 198 patients underwent SCOPE with one Nuss bar, receiving either intraoperative intercostal nerve cryoablation (Cryo, n = 100) or preoperative thoracic paravertebral catheters (NoCryo, n = 98). Surgical time was on average 9 min longer for the Cryo group (p<0.01). Median length of stay for the Cryo group was 3 days shorter compared to the NoCryo group (p<0.01). The Cryo group had a 19-fold and 5.6-fold reduction in average inpatient and total postoperative opioid usage, respectively (p<0.01). Total hospital costs were significantly lower in the Cryo group (p<0.01). Overall complication rate was not statistically significant different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative one minute per level cryoablation is a potent approach to postoperative analgesia for SCOPE patients that led to a shorter hospital length of stay, lower hospital costs, and decreased opioid use compared to conventional analgesia at our institution. Pediatric surgeons performing correction of chest wall deformities should consider offering this technique.
Assuntos
Analgesia , Criocirurgia , Tórax em Funil , Parede Torácica , Adulto , Criança , Humanos , Criocirurgia/métodos , Nervos Intercostais/cirurgia , Analgésicos Opioides , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tórax em Funil/cirurgia , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Analgesia/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Recent studies are discordant regarding postoperative use of piperacillin/tazobactam (PT) versus ceftriaxone/metronidazole (CM) for pediatric complicated appendicitis. Some argue that the broader spectrum PT decreases intraabdominal abscess formation; however, antibiotic stewardship, and once-a-day dosing favor CM. We aim to compare outcomes of postoperative antibiotic utilization using a large administrative database. METHODS: We queried the Pediatric Health Information System for patients 2-18 years old who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis between 2016 and 2021. Patients were grouped into PT, CM, or other using the first postoperative day antibiotics. Adverse events and antibiotic use trends were evaluated. RESULTS: We included 29,015 children from 45 hospitals. CM was used in 51.9% and 31.3% received PT. Wide variation was seen among hospitals with PT use decreasing over the years. Overall rate of abscess was 9.2%. On multivariable regression, PT was associated with higher risk for abscess formation (RR 1.35, 99% CI 1.04-1.75) and readmission (RR 1.38, 99% CI 1.13-1.68) compared to the CM group. However, following adjustment for hospitals with high CM prevalence, these associations were no longer significant. CONCLUSION: Postoperative use of PT for complicated appendicitis is associated with higher rates of readmissions and intraabdominal abscess when compared to CM. However, this effect is mitigated when adjusting for common practice patterns. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective Comparative Study.
Assuntos
Abscesso Abdominal , Apendicite , Humanos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Adolescente , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Ceftriaxona/uso terapêutico , Metronidazol/uso terapêutico , Abscesso/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Apendicite/complicações , Apendicite/tratamento farmacológico , Apendicite/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Combinação Piperacilina e Tazobactam/uso terapêutico , Abscesso Abdominal/epidemiologia , Abscesso Abdominal/etiologia , Apendicectomia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: During post-discharge telephone calls after pediatric surgery, clinicians must rely on parents/caregivers' assessment of symptoms, which can be inaccurate and often lead to unnecessary emergency department (ED) visits. Physiology (heart rate and physical activity) data from consumer-grade wearables, e.g., Fitbit™, may inform clinical decision making, yet there has been little study of clinician interpretation of this data. This study assessed whether wearable data availability, during simulated telephone calls about postoperative, post-discharge pediatric patients, affects clinician decision making. METHODS: Three simulated telephone call scenarios were presented to a diverse group of pediatric surgery clinicians. The scenarios were based on actual postoperative patients (scenarios 1 and 3 have worrisome symptoms and scenario 2 has non-worrisome symptoms) who had worn a Fitbit™ postoperatively. Each scenario was presented to clinicians (1) without any wearable data; (2) with "concerning" wearable data; and (3) with "reassuring" wearable data. Clinicians rated their likelihood, on a scale of 1-10, of recommending an emergency department (ED) visit for the three instances of each scenario, 10 being definitely ED. RESULTS: Twenty-four (24) clinicians participated in the study. When presented with "reassuring" wearable data, clinicians' likelihood of recommending an ED visit decreased from a median score of 6 to 1 (p < 0.001) for scenario 1 and from 9 to 3 (p < 0.001) for scenario 3. When presented with "concerning" wearable data, the median likelihood of recommending an ED visit increased from 1 to 6 (p = 0.003) for scenario 2. CONCLUSION: This study showed that wearable data affect clinicians' decision making and may be useful in triaging postoperative, post-discharge pediatric patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V.