Vulvar reconstruction using the "lotus petal" fascio-cutaneous flap.

INTRODUCTION: Vulvar reconstruction using the "lotus petal" fascio-cutaneous flap offers a relatively novel means to restore symmetry and functionality after extirpative gynecologic or oncologic procedures. We sought to assess the success rates and morbidity in a large series of consecutively treated patients. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 59 consecutive cases of lotus petal flaps performed at a single institution to more accurately assess success and complication rates. RESULTS: We identified 80 flaps performed among the 59 patients between September 1, 2008 and March 30, 2013. The median (range) age was 59 years (24-89) and the median (range) BMI was 27 kg/m(2) (19-34). The indications for vulvar/perineal excision were as follows: 39 (66.1%) vulvar carcinoma or melanoma, 12 (20.3%) vulvar dysplasia, 5 (8.5%) colorectal disease and 3 (5.1%) cases of hidradenitis suppurativa. The mean defect area, determined by post-fixation pathology specimen was 29 cm(2). Medical or surgical complications occurred in 36% of patients of which superficial wound separation was the most common (15%). There were no cases of complete flap loss, but partial loss occurred in 7 (8.8%) cases. 3 (5.1%) patients required re-operation prior to discharge with one case requiring skin grafting. Delayed surgical revision was required in 4 patients for partial flap loss (2) or stricture/stenosis (2). CONCLUSION: The lotus petal flap is safe for use in gynecologic reconstruction, with acceptable short- and long-term complication rates. Previous reports of smaller series likely underestimate the risk of complications through case selection.

The importance of a full clinical examination: assessment of index lesions referred to a skin cancer clinic without a total body skin examination would miss one in three melanomas.

Traditional clinical teaching emphasises the importance of a full clinical examination. In the clinical assessment of lesions that may be skin cancer, full examination allows detection of incidental lesions, as well as helping in the characterisation of the index lesion. Despite this, a total body skin examination is not always performed. Based on two prospective studies of over 1,800 sequential patients in two UK centres we show that over one third of melanomas detected in secondary care are found as incidental lesions, in patients referred for assessment of other potential skin cancers. The majority of these melanomas occurred in patients whose index lesion turned out to be benign. Alternative models of care--for instance some models of teledermatology in which a total body skin examination is not performed by a competent practitioner--cannot be considered equivalent to a traditional consultation and, if adopted uncritically, without system change, will likely lead to melanomas being missed.

Dermatology undergraduate skin cancer training: a disconnect between recommendations, clinical exposure and competence.

BACKGROUND: Skin cancers are the most common malignancies in Caucasian populations. Non-specialists are responsible for the initial assessment of skin lesions and are required to act as the gatekeepers to dermatological cancer services in many healthcare systems. The majority of such physicians receive very limited formal undergraduate or postgraduate dermatology training. The British Association of Dermatologists (BAD) has produced guidelines that list the lesions that students should be able to diagnose on graduation and the majority of UK medical schools' operate curricula in keeping with these. There is, however, virtually no evidence as to whether these competencies are being achieved. We set out to determine students' competence at skin lesion diagnosis and to quantify their clinical exposure to examples of such lesions during their dermatology attachment. METHODS: Three linked studies were undertaken. In the first, students' competence was tested by randomized slideshows of images containing the 16 lesions recommended in the UK guidelines. Students' accuracy was tested at the beginning (Day 1) and end (Day 10) of their clinical placement, with a random sample of students retested 12 months later. Secondly, students' exposure to these lesions was recorded during their attachments. Finally a survey of the additional dermatological resources used by the students was undertaken. RESULTS: Study 1: Students' diagnostic accuracy increased from 11% on Day 1 to 33% on Day 10 (effect size +2.72). After 12 months half of this effect had disappeared and the students accuracy had dropped to 24%. Study 2: Students' exposure to the recommended lesions was poor with 82% not even witnessing a single example of each of the 3 major skin cancers. Despite these measurements, only a minority of students reported that they were not confident at diagnosing skin tumours. Study 3: The majority of students use additional resources to supplement their learning. CONCLUSIONS: In the light of what we know about learning in dermatology, our data would suggest, that the current (traditional) undergraduate attachment is inadequate to meet the UK recommendations for graduate competence. As well as critically examining the basis for these recommendations, we need more empirical data on student performance and exposure, in order to improve teaching and learning.

Novice identification of melanoma: not quite as straightforward as the ABCDs.

The "ABCD" mnemonic to assist non-experts' diagnosis of melanoma is widely promoted; however, there are good reasons to be sceptical about public education strategies based on analytical, rule-based approaches--such as ABCD (i.e. Asymmetry, Border Irregularity, Colour Uniformity and Diameter). Evidence suggests that accurate diagnosis of skin lesions is achieved predominately through non-analytical pattern recognition (via training examples) and not by rule-based algorithms. If the ABCD are to function as a useful public education tool they must be used reliably by untrained novices, with low inter-observer and intra-diagnosis variation, but with maximal inter-diagnosis differences. The three subjective properties (the ABCs of the ABCD) were investigated experimentally: 33 laypersons scored 40 randomly selected lesions (10 lesions × 4 diagnoses: benign naevi, dysplastic naevi, melanomas, seborrhoeic keratoses) for the three properties on visual analogue scales. The results (n = 3,960) suggest that novices cannot use the ABCs reliably to discern benign from malignant lesions.

Utility of non-rule-based visual matching as a strategy to allow novices to achieve skin lesion diagnosis.

Non-analytical reasoning is thought to play a key role in dermatology diagnosis. Considering its potential importance, surprisingly little work has been done to research whether similar identification processes can be supported in non-experts. We describe here a prototype diagnostic support software, which we have used to examine the ability of medical students (at the beginning and end of a dermatology attachment) and lay volunteers, to diagnose 12 images of common skin lesions. Overall, the non-experts using the software had a diagnostic accuracy of 98% (923/936) compared with 33% for the control group (215/648) (Wilcoxon p < 0.0001). We have demonstrated, within the constraints of a simplified clinical model, that novices' diagnostic scores are significantly increased by the use of a structured image database coupled with matching of index and referent images. The novices achieve this high degree of accuracy without any use of explicit definitions of likeness or rule-based strategies.

Choice of incision: the experience and evolution of surgical management of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the impact of laparoscopic pyloromyotomy since it came into use at our institution in March 1999. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The recovery profiles and intraoperative and postoperative complications of 170 infants who underwent laparoscopic, semicircumumbilical incision, or right upper quadrant incision pyloromyotomies between March 1999 and April 2005 were analyzed. RESULTS: Eighty-one (48%) of operations were undertaken laparoscopically, 51 (30%) by traditional right upper quadrant incision, and 38 (22%) by semicircumumbilical incision. Patient group demographics were similar across all groups. There was no significant difference in overall complication rate between procedures: laparoscopic group, 12.3% (10/81); semicircumumbilical incision group, 18.4% (7/38); and right upper quadrant incision group, 9.8% (5/51). Early in the laparoscopic series there were 2 inadequate pyloromyotomies and 2 conversions to open procedures due to perforation (n = 1) and poor visibility (n = 1). Infections were more common with open surgery: laparoscopic, 1.2% (n = 1), right upper quadrant incision, 7.8% (n = 4), and semicircumumbilical incision, 13.2% (n = 5). Operative correction was required for herniation at 3 laparoscopic incision sites (3.6%), 2 semicircumumbilical incision sites (5.3%), and 2 right upper quadrant incision sites (3.9%). Patients who underwent laparoscopy returned to full feeds faster (laparoscopic, 18.1 hours; right upper quadrant incision, 28.1 hours; and semicircumumbilical incision, 28.9 hours) (P < 0.05), required less analgesia (laparoscopic, 2.1 doses; right upper quadrant incision, 4.0 doses; and semicircumumbilical incision, 4.3 doses) (P < 0.05), and had less emesis (laparoscopic, 1.6 episodes; right upper quadrant incision, 2.9 episodes; and semicircumumbilical incision, 3.5 episodes) (P < 0.05), resulting in faster discharge (laparoscopic, 2.0 days; right upper quadrant incision, 3.1 days; and semicircumumbilical incision, 3.2 days) (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic pyloromytomy is as effective and safe as open procedures and is associated with an improved recovery profile. We conclude that, where laparoscopic skills exist, laparoscopy should be the management of choice for hypertrophic pyloric stenosis.